Skip to main content

Improve Statistical Reporting Forms in Research Institutions of the Health Ministry of Russia

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Decision Technologies (IDT 2020)

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 193))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 428 Accesses

Abstract

The effectiveness of the research results implementation is one of the main indicators that must be taken into account in the allocation of budget funds for research. The requirement of efficiency of spending budget funds allocated for research works leads to the necessity for continuous improvement of the methodological apparatus of decision support on the allocation of funds, including considering the efficiency of the implementation of previously obtained research results of each certain Research Institution. With the development of information technology, it is important to improve the quality of information support for decision-making on the organization of scientific research in the Ministry of Health, including by improving the system of indicators and criteria for assessing the potential of scientific research institutions, reflecting their ability to achieve the desired results in the implementation of government contracts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Selby, J.V., Lipstein, S.H.: PCORI at 3 years—progress, lessons, and plans. N. Engl. J. Med. 370(7), 592–595 (2014) (13 Feb 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sully, B.G., Julious, S.A., Nicholl, J.: A reinvestigation of recruitment to randomized, controlled, multicenter trials: a review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials. 14, 166 (2013) (9 Jun 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arnold, E., Brown, N., Eriksson, A., Jansson, T., Muscio, A., Nählinder, J., et al.: The Role of Industrial Research Institutes in the National Innovation System. VINNOVA, Stockholm (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sveiby, K-E.: What is Knowledge Management? (2001). https://www.sveiby.com/Articles?page_articles=2. Accessed 31 Jan 2019

  5. Anderson, M.L., Califf, R.M., Sugarman, J.: Participants in the NIH Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory Cluster Randomized Trial Workshop. Ethical and regulatory issues of pragmatic cluster randomized trials in contemporary health systems. Clin. Trials. 12(3), 276–286 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774515571140

  6. Frewer, L.J., Coles, D., van der Lans, I.A., Schroeder, D., Champion, K., Apperley, J.F.: Impact of the European clinical trials directive on prospective academic clinical trials associated with BMT. Bone Marrow Transplant. 46(3), 443–447 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Warlow C. A new NHS research strategy. Lancet. 2006 Jan 7; 367 (9504): 12–13 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lebedev, G., Krylov, O., Lelyakov, A., Mironov, Y., Tkachenko, V., Zykov, S.: Scientific Research in Scientific Institutions of Russian Ministry of Health. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies (June 2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. VanLare, J.M., Conway, P.H., Sox, H.C.: Five next steps for a new national program for comparative-effectiveness research. N. Engl. J. Med. 362(11), 970–973 (2010) (18 Mar 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Higher Education Funding Council for England 2017 Research Excellence Framework [updated 2017 March 17]. Assessment criteria and level definitions [updated 2014 Dec 12]. https://www.ref.ac.uk/2014/panels/assessmentcriteriaandleveldefinitions/. Accessed 31 Jan 2019

  11. Califf, R.M.: The patient-centered outcomes research network: a national infrastructure for comparative effectiveness research. N. C. Med. J. 75(3), 204–210 (2014) (May–Jun 2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georgy Lebedev .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lebedev, G. et al. (2020). Improve Statistical Reporting Forms in Research Institutions of the Health Ministry of Russia. In: Czarnowski, I., Howlett, R., Jain, L. (eds) Intelligent Decision Technologies. IDT 2020. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 193. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5925-9_36

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics