Implications of International Harmonization of IPR on Growth and Competitiveness Among the Developing Nations
- 11 Downloads
Enhancement of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and its implication on developing countries are discussed enormously during the last few decades. The main argument is that even after the mandate of Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), it is not clear whether the developing countries are benefiting from the higher levels of IPR. On the assumption that international harmonization of IPR could make all nations better off, especially lower-income countries, we considered 99 countries from various income groups to test the hypothesis. The present study considers appreciation in the competitiveness of a country as an outcome of enhanced IPR, which encourages innovation in the first stage and competitiveness in the later stage. The study employs new indices, Global Competitiveness Index and IPR Index, respectively, for competition and IPR. We find that the role of IPR is different in different countries for promoting innovation and enhancing competitiveness and growth.
KeywordsInternational harmonization Intellectual property rights Competitiveness Developing nations TRIPS Growth
- Basant, R., & Sebastian, M. (2000). Competition policy in India: Issues for a globalizing economy. Economic and Political Weekly, 35(31). https://doi.org/10.2307/4409560.
- Branstetter, L., Fisman, R., Foley, C. F., & Saggi, K. (2007). Intellectual property rights, imitation, and foreign direct investment: Theory and evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(1), 321–349. https://doi.org/10.3386/w13033.
- Cantwell, J. (2006). Innovation and competitiveness. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, & R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 543–567). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Chang, H. (2002). Kicking away the ladder: Development strategy in historical perspective. Anthem Press.Google Scholar
- Chen,Y., & Puttitanun, T. (2005). Intellectual property rights and innovation in developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 78(2), 474–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.11.005.
- Chin, J. C., & G. M. Grossman. (1990). Intellectual property rights and North-South trade. In R. W. Jones, & A. O. Krueger (Eds.), The political economy of international trade: Essays in honor of Robert E. Baldwin (pp. 90–107). Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Deardorff, A. V. (1992). Welfare effects of global patent protection. Economica, 59(233), 35. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555064.
- Glass, A. J., & Saggi, K. (2002). Intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment. Journal of International Economics, 56(2) (n.d.), 387–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(01)00117-9.
- Glass, A. J., & Wu, X. (2007). Intellectual property rights and quality improvement. Journal of Development Economics, 82(2), 393–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2005.08.002.
- Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1991b). Quality ladders in the theory of growth. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.2307/2298044.
- Hassan, E., Yaqub, O., & Diepeveen, S. (2010). Intellectual property and Developing countries a review of the literature. The Rand Corporation. Available at http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/technical_reports/2010/RAND_TR804.pdf.
- Hu, A. G. Z., & Jaffe, A. B. (2007). IPR, innovation, economic growth and development. Available at http://www0.gsb.columbia.edu/ipd/pub/Hu_Jaffe.pdf.
- Kanwar, S. (2006). Innovation and intellectual property rights. Working Papers 142, Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics. Available at https://ideas.repec.org/p/cde/cdewps/142.html.
- Kim, Y. K. (2016). Intellectual property rights and technological catch-up in Korea. In Economic catch-up and technological leapfrogging (Chap. 4, pp. 56–85). Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
- Kumar, N., & Pradhan, J. P. (2002). Foreign direct investment, externalities and economic growth in developing countries: Some empirical explorations and implications for WTO negotiations on investment. RIS Discussion Paper No. 27/2002, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
- Mansfield, E. (1994). Intellectual property protection, foreign direct investment, and technology transfer. Washington, D.C.: World Bank and International Finance Corporation.Google Scholar
- Maskus, K. E. (2000). Intellectual property rights in the global economy. Washington D.C.: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
- Maskus, K. E., & Fink, C. (2005). Intellectual property and development: Lessons from recent economic research. World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
- Primo Braga, C., Fink, C., & Paz Sepulveda, C. (2000). Intellectual property rights and economic development. World Bank Discussion Paper No. 412.Google Scholar
- Richards, D. G. (2004). Intellectual property rights and global capitalism. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
- World Bank. (2017). World Bank blogs, new Country classifications by income level. Available at https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/new-country-classifications-2016.