Advertisement

Implications of International Harmonization of IPR on Growth and Competitiveness Among the Developing Nations

  • Sunil Kumar AmbrammalEmail author
Chapter
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

Enhancement of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and its implication on developing countries are discussed enormously during the last few decades. The main argument is that even after the mandate of Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), it is not clear whether the developing countries are benefiting from the higher levels of IPR. On the assumption that international harmonization of IPR could make all nations better off, especially lower-income countries, we considered 99 countries from various income groups to test the hypothesis. The present study considers appreciation in the competitiveness of a country as an outcome of enhanced IPR, which encourages innovation in the first stage and competitiveness in the later stage. The study employs new indices, Global Competitiveness Index and IPR Index, respectively, for competition and IPR. We find that the role of IPR is different in different countries for promoting innovation and enhancing competitiveness and growth.

Keywords

International harmonization Intellectual property rights Competitiveness Developing nations TRIPS Growth 

References

  1. Ambrammal, S. K., & Sharma, R. (2014). R&D and patenting by firms in India in high- and medium-high-technology industries. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 12(2), 181–207.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14765284.2014.900957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Basant, R., & Sebastian, M. (2000). Competition policy in India: Issues for a globalizing economy. Economic and Political Weekly, 35(31).  https://doi.org/10.2307/4409560.
  3. Branstetter, L., Fisman, R., Foley, C. F., & Saggi, K. (2007). Intellectual property rights, imitation, and foreign direct investment: Theory and evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(1), 321–349.  https://doi.org/10.3386/w13033.
  4. Cantwell, J. (2006). Innovation and competitiveness. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, & R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 543–567). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Chang, H. (2002). Kicking away the ladder: Development strategy in historical perspective. Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chen,Y., & Puttitanun, T. (2005). Intellectual property rights and innovation in developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 78(2), 474–493.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.11.005.
  7. Chin, J. C., & G. M. Grossman. (1990). Intellectual property rights and North-South trade. In R. W. Jones, & A. O. Krueger (Eds.), The political economy of international trade: Essays in honor of Robert E. Baldwin (pp. 90–107). Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. Deardorff, A. V. (1992). Welfare effects of global patent protection. Economica, 59(233), 35.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2555064.
  9. Diwan, I., & Rodrik, D. (1991). Patents, appropriate technology, and North-South trade. Journal of International Economics, 30(1–2), 27–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(91)90003-o.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dunning, J. H. (1980). Toward an eclectic theory of international production: Some empirical tests. Journal of International Business Studies, 11(1), 9–31.  https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Falvey, R., Greenaway, D., & Foster, N. (2006). Intellectual property rights and economic growth. Review of Development Economics, 10(4), 700–719.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9361.2006.00343.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Glass, A. J., & Saggi, K. (2002). Intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment. Journal of International Economics, 56(2) (n.d.), 387–410.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(01)00117-9.
  13. Glass, A. J., & Wu, X. (2007). Intellectual property rights and quality improvement. Journal of Development Economics, 82(2), 393–415.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2005.08.002.
  14. Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1991a). Quality ladders and product cycles. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 557.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2937947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1991b). Quality ladders in the theory of growth. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(1), 43.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2298044.
  16. Hassan, E., Yaqub, O., & Diepeveen, S. (2010). Intellectual property and Developing countries a review of the literature. The Rand Corporation. Available at http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/technical_reports/2010/RAND_TR804.pdf.
  17. Helpman, E. (1993). Innovation, imitation, and intellectual property rights. Econometrica, 61(6), 1247–1280.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2951642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Horii, R., & Iwaisako, T. (2006). Economic growth with imperfect protection of intellectual property rights. Journal of Economics, 90(1), 45–85.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-006-0222-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hu, A. G. Z., & Jaffe, A. B. (2007). IPR, innovation, economic growth and development. Available at http://www0.gsb.columbia.edu/ipd/pub/Hu_Jaffe.pdf.
  20. Jovane, F., Koren, Y., & Boër, C. R. (2003). Present and future of flexible automation: Towards new paradigms. CIRP Annals, 52(2), 543–560.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60203-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kanwar, S. (2003). Does intellectual property protection spur technological change? Oxford Economic Papers, 55(2), 235–264.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/55.2.235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kanwar, S. (2006). Innovation and intellectual property rights. Working Papers 142, Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics. Available at https://ideas.repec.org/p/cde/cdewps/142.html.
  23. Kim, Y. K. (2016). Intellectual property rights and technological catch-up in Korea. In Economic catch-up and technological leapfrogging (Chap. 4, pp. 56–85). Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. Krugman, P. (1979). A model of innovation, technology transfer, and the world distribution of income. Journal of Political Economy, 87(2), 253–266.  https://doi.org/10.1086/260755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krugman, P. (1994). Competitiveness: A dangerous obsession. Foreign Affairs, 73(2), 28.  https://doi.org/10.2307/20045917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kumar, N., & Pradhan, J. P. (2002). Foreign direct investment, externalities and economic growth in developing countries: Some empirical explorations and implications for WTO negotiations on investment. RIS Discussion Paper No. 27/2002, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
  27. Lai, E. L. (1998). International intellectual property rights protection and the rate of product innovation. Journal of Development Economics, 55(1), 133–153.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3878(97)00059-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mansfield, E. (1994). Intellectual property protection, foreign direct investment, and technology transfer. Washington, D.C.: World Bank and International Finance Corporation.Google Scholar
  29. Maskus, K. E. (2000). Intellectual property rights in the global economy. Washington D.C.: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  30. Maskus, K. E., & Fink, C. (2005). Intellectual property and development: Lessons from recent economic research. World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
  31. Maskus, K. E., & Penubarti, M. (1995). How trade-related are intellectual property rights? Journal of International Economics, 39(3–4), 227–248.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(95)01377-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Muzaka, V. (2013). Intellectual property protection and European ‘competitiveness’. Review of International Political Economy, 20(4), 819–847.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2012.724436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Porter, M. (1990). The competitive advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Primo Braga, C., Fink, C., & Paz Sepulveda, C. (2000). Intellectual property rights and economic development. World Bank Discussion Paper No. 412.Google Scholar
  35. Qian, Y. (2007). Do National patent laws stimulate domestic innovation in a global patenting environment? A cross-country analysis of pharmaceutical patent protection, 1978–2002. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(3), 436–453.  https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.89.3.436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Richards, D. G. (2004). Intellectual property rights and global capitalism. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  37. Saggi, K. (1999). Foreign direct investment, licensing, and incentives for innovation. Review of International Economics, 7(4), 699–714.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9396.00194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sakakibara, M., & Branstetter, L. (2001). Do stronger patents induce more innovation? Evidence from the 1988 Japanese patent law reforms. The Rand Journal of Economics, 32(1), 77.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2696399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Taylor, M. S. (1994). Trips, trade, and growth. International Economic Review, 35(2), 361.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2527058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. World Bank. (2017). World Bank blogs, new Country classifications by income level. Available at https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/new-country-classifications-2016.
  41. Yang, G., & Maskus, K. E. (2001). Intellectual property rights, licensing, and innovation in an endogenous product-cycle model. Journal of International Economics, 53(1), 169–187.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1996(00)00062-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Humanities and Social SciencesNational Institute of Technology GoaPondaIndia

Personalised recommendations