Advertisement

Metacognitive Capability: The Superordinate Competence for the Twenty-First Century

  • Dennis SaleEmail author
Chapter
  • 21 Downloads
Part of the Cognitive Science and Technology book series (CSAT)

Abstract

This chapter argues that Metacognitive Capability is the Superordinate twenty-first century competency. While there is much reference to the 4 C’s of critical thinking, creativity/creative thinking, communication and collaboration, these are essentially no more than extended versions of first century skills. However, in a world of exponential knowledge, but with a brain perfectly equipped for the world of primitive life in centuries past, we are increasingly suffering from cognitive overload and strain. No matter what we do pedagogically, we cannot solve the knowledge explosion with a stone-age brain. We must develop the capability to think, learn and self-regulate better. Metacognitive Capability—as framed here—is the unique human quality that can best help us deal with the challenges of modern life, as well as maintain positive well-being. The chapter extensively unpacks the components of metacognition, how they work in terms of psychological functioning and, most importantly, how to  use pedagogic strategies that can develop this capability to optimal levels.

References

  1. Adler H (1996) NLP for managers. Judy Piatkus, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Akturk AO, Sahin I (2011) Literature review on metacognition and its measurement. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 15:3731–3736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alderman MK (2008) Motivation for achievement: possibilities for teaching and learning. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Ambrose SA et al (2010) How Learning works: 7 research-based principles for smart teaching. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandura A (1997) Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. Worth Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Bandura A (2004) Swimming against the mainstream: the early years from chilly tributary to transformative mainstream. Behav Res Ther 42:613–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baumeister RF, Tierney J (2012) Willpower. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Biggs J (1988) The role of metacognition in enhancing learning. Aust J Educ 32(2):127–138MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borkowski JG, Chan LK, Muthukrishna N (2000) A process-oriented model of metacognition: links between motivation and executive functioning. Issues in the measurement of metacognition. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NB, pp 1–41Google Scholar
  10. Bransford JD, Brown AL, Cocking RR (1999) How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. National research CouncilGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown AL (1987) Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In: Weinert FE, Kluwe RH (eds) Metacognition, motivation, and understanding. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp 65–116Google Scholar
  12. Brown PC, Roediger HL IIII, McDaniel MA (2014) Make it stick: the science of successful learning. Harvard University Press, MAGoogle Scholar
  13. Chickering AW, Gamson ZF (1987) Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. Am Assoc High Educ Bull 3–7Google Scholar
  14. Claxton G (1998) Hare brain tortoise mind: why intelligence increases when you think less. Fourth Estate Limited, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Coles MJ, Robinson WD (1989) Teaching thinking: a survey of programmes in education. The Bristol Press, BristolGoogle Scholar
  16. Collins A (2017) What’s worth teaching: rethinking curriculum in the age of technology teachers. College Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Costa A (2019) https://artcostacentre.com/html/habits.htm. Last accessed 20th Oct 2019
  18. Davidson RJ (2000) Affective style, psychopathology, and resilience: brain mechanisms and plasticity. Am Psychol 55:1196–1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dignath C, Buettner G, Langfeldt H (2008) How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively? A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programs. Educ Res Rev 3:101–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Duckworth AL et al (2007) Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals. J Pers 92(6):1087Google Scholar
  21. Dweck CS (2006) Mindset: the new psychology of success. Ballantine, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Dweck CS, Legget EL (1989) A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Am Psychol Assoc 95(2):256–273Google Scholar
  23. Dweck CS, Master A (2012) Self-theories motivate self-regulated learning. In: Schunk DH, Zimmerman BJ (eds) Motivation and self-regulated learning: theory, research and applications. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Eccles JS, Wigfield A (2002) Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annu Rev Psychol 53:109–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Epstein D (2014) The sports gene: inside the science of extraordinary athletic performance. Penguin, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  26. Ericsson KA, Krampe RT, Tesch-Romer C (1993) The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychol Rev 100:363–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fadel C, Trilling B (2015) Meta-learning for the 21st century: what should students learn? Center for Curriculum Redesign, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  28. Farrington CA et al (2012) Teaching adolescents to become learners: the role of noncognitive factors in shaping school performance: a critical literature review. The University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research (CCSR), ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  29. Fazey MA, Fazey JA (2001) The potential for autonomy in learning: perceptions of competence, motivation and locus of control in first-year undergraduate students. Taylor & Francis, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  30. Fennimore TF, Tinzmann MB (1990) What is a thinking curriculum? Web Page: https://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/rpl_esys/thinking. Last accessed 22nd Nov 2019
  31. Flavell JH (1976) Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In: Resnick LB (ed) The nature of intelligence. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  32. Flavell JH (1979) Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new era of cognitive developmental inquiry. Am Psychol 34(10):906–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Flavell JH (1981) Cognitive monitoring. In: Dickson WP (ed) Children’s oral communication. Academic Press, New York, pp 35–60Google Scholar
  34. Flavell JH (1987) Speculation about the nature and development of metacognition. In: Wernert FE, Kluwe RH (eds) Metacognition, motivation and understanding. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  35. Fogarty R (2009) How to integrate the curricula. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. Fromm E (1987) The anatomy of human destructiveness [1973]. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, UKGoogle Scholar
  37. Gladwell M (2008) Outliers: the story of success. Little Brown and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Goleman D (2013) Focus: the hidden driver of excellence. HarperCollins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Guglielmino LM (1978) Development of the self-directed learning readiness scale. Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, 1977. Dissertation, Abstracts International, 38, 6467AGoogle Scholar
  40. Haidar AH, Al Naqabi AK (2008) Emiratii high school students’ understanding of stoichiometry and the influence of metacognition on their understanding. Res Sci Technol Educ 26(2):215–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hattie J (2009) Visible learning. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Hattie J, Yates GCR (2014) Visible learning and the science of how we learn. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Hidi S (2006) Interest: a unique motivational variable. Educ Res Rev 1(2)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hidi S, Renninger KA (2006) The four-phase model of interest development. Educ Psychol 41:111–127.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jones MG, Farq JD, Surry D (1995) Using metacognitive theories to design user interfaces for computer-based learning. Educ Technol 35:12–22Google Scholar
  46. Kahneman D (2012) Thinking fast and slow. Penguin Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  47. Kistner S et al (2010) Promotion of self-regulated learning in classrooms: investigating frequency, quality, and consequences for student performance. Metacogn Learn 5(2):157–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kluwe RH (1987) Executive decisions and regulation of problem solving behavior. In: Weinert FE, Kluwe RH (eds) Metacognition, motivation, and understanding. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  49. Knowles MS (1975) Self-directed learning: a guide to learners and teachers. Association Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Ku KYL, Ho IT (2010) Metacognitive strategies that enhance critical thinking. Metacogn Learn 2010(5):251–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lai ER (2012) Metacognition: a literature review. https://images.pearsonassessments.com/images/tmrs/Metacognition_Literature_Review_Final.pdf. Last accessed, 15 Nov 2019
  52. Lang JM (2016) Everyday lessons from the science of learning. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  53. Mango C (2010) The role of metacognitive skills in developing critical thinking. Metacogn Learn 2010(5):137–156.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-010-9054-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Marcus G (2008) Kluge: the haphazard evolution of the human mind. Mariner Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  55. Martinez ME (2006) What is metacognition? Phi Delta Kappan 87(9): 696–699. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170608700916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Marzano RJ et al (1988) Dimensions of thinking: a framework for curriculum and instruction. ASCD, Alexandria, VAGoogle Scholar
  57. Marzano RJ et al (2007) Designing and teaching learning goals and objectives: classroom strategies that work. Marzano Research Laboratory, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  58. Maudsley DB (1979) A theory of meta-learning and principles of facilitation: an organismic perspective. Thesis (E.D.), University of TorontoGoogle Scholar
  59. Mazur E (1996) Peer instruction: a user’s manual. Prentice Hall, NJ, USAGoogle Scholar
  60. Mlodinow L (2012) Subliminal: how your unconscious mind rules your behaviour. Vintage Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  61. Moustakas C (1990) Heuristic research. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  62. Neubauer S et al (2018) The evolution of modern human brain shape. Sci Adv 4(1)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Noushad PP (2008) Cognitions about cognitions: the theory of metacognitionGoogle Scholar
  64. Ormrod JE (2011) Our minds, our memories: enhancing thinking and learning at all ages. Pearson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  65. Pajares F (2012) Motivational role of self-efficacy beliefs in self-regulated learning. In: Schunk DH, Zimmerman BJ (eds) Motivation and self-regulated learning: theories, research, and application. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, NJGoogle Scholar
  66. Panksepp J (2004) Affective neuroscience: the foundations of human and animal emotions. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  67. Paris SG, Winograd P (1990) Promoting metacognition and motivation of exceptional children. Remedial Spec Educ 11(6):7–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Paul RW (1993) Critical thinking: foundation for critical thinking. Santa Rosa, CAGoogle Scholar
  69. Perkins DN (1995) Outsmarting IQ: the emerging science of learnable intelligence. The Free Press, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  70. Pinker S (2003) The blank slate: the modern denial of human nature. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  71. Pintrich PR, De Groot EV (1990) Motivational and self-regulated components of classroom academic performance. J Educ Psychol 82:33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Reeve J, Tseng C (2001) Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemp Educ Psychol 36(2011):257–267Google Scholar
  73. Resnick LB, Resnick DP (1989) Assessing the thinking curriculum: new tools for educational reform. In: Gifford BR, O’Connor MC (eds) Future assessments: changing views of aptitude, achievement, and instruction. Kluwer Academic Publishers, BostonGoogle Scholar
  74. Ritchhart R, Church M, Morrison K (2011) Making thinking visible. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  75. Robbins A (2001) Unlimited power. Pocket Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  76. Rohn J (2019) Quote available at: https://www.quoteswise.com/jim-rohn-quotes-5.html. Last accessed on 3rd Dec 2019
  77. Ryan RM, Deci EL (2017) Self determination theory: basic needs in motivation, development, and wellness. The Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  78. Saks K, Leijen A (2013) Distinguishing self-directed and self-regulated learning and measuring them in the e-learning context. In: International conference on education & educational psychologyGoogle Scholar
  79. Sale D (2013) The challenge of reframing engineering education. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  80. Schank R (2011) Teaching minds: how cognitive science can save our schools. Teacher College Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  81. Schraw G (1998) Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instr Sci 26:113–125 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands)Google Scholar
  82. Schraw G, Dennison RP (2004) Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemp Educ Psychol 19:460–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Schraw G et al (2006) Promoting self-regulation in science education: metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Res Sci Educ 36:111–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Schulman LS (2005) Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus 134(3):52–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Schunk D, Zimmerman BJ (2012) Motivation and self-regulated learning: theory, research, and applications. Routledge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Schwarz N (2010) Meaning in context: metacognitive experiences. In: Mesquita B, Barrett LF, Smith ER (eds) The mind in context. Guilford, New York, pp 105–125Google Scholar
  87. Sheppard SD et al (2009) Educating engineers: designing for the future of the field. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  88. Stenhouse L (1989) An introduction to curriculum research and development. Heinemann Educational Books, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  89. Stockard J et al (2018) The effectiveness of direct instruction curricula: a meta-analysis of a half century of research. Rev Educ Res 88(4):479–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Swartz RJ (1987) Teaching for thinking: a developmental model for the infusion of thinking skills into mainstream instruction. In: Baron JB, Sternberg RJ (eds) Teaching thinking skills: theory and practice. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  91. Swartz RJ, Perkins DN (1990) Teaching thinking: issues approaches. Critical Thinking Press & Software, CAGoogle Scholar
  92. Tombari M, Borich G (1999) Authentic assessment in the classroom. Prentice-Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  93. Tomlinson CA (2005) The differentiated classroom: responding to the needs of all learners, 2nd edn. ASCD, Alexandria, VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  94. Tough P (2013) How children succeed: grit, curiosity, and the hidden power of character. Random House Books, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  95. Treadwell M (2017) The future of learning. The Global Curriculum Project, Mount Maunganui, NZGoogle Scholar
  96. Veenman VJ et al (2006) Metacognition and learning: conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacogn Learn 2006(1):3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Weiner B (1992) Human motivation: metaphors, theories and research. Sage, Newbury Park, CAGoogle Scholar
  98. Whitehead AN (1967) The aims of education. Free Press, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  99. Willingham DT (2009) Why don’t students like school: a cognitive scientist answers questions about how the mind works and what it means for the classroom. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  100. Winne PH (1995) Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educ Psychol 30(4):173–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Wlodkowski RJ (1999) Enhancing adult motivation to learn: a comprehensive guide for teaching all adults. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  102. Zimmerman BJ, Kitsantas A (1999) Acquiring writing revision skill: shifting from process to outcome self-regulatory goals. J Educ Psychol 91(2):241–250. psycnet.apa.orgCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Zimmerman BJ, Martinez-Pons M (2012) Student differences in self-regulated learning: relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. J Educ Psychol 82(1):51–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Zimmerman BJ et al (1992) Self-motivation for academic attainment: the role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. Am Educ Res J 29(3):663–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Singapore PolytechnicSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations