Research on the Influence of BBL and EBL on Students’ Learning Factors in Digital Sculpture Course

  • Hung SunEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 551)


In recent years, the development of 3D animation and game industry has promoted the demand for digital sculpture, making digital sculpture technology an indispensable application for 3D learning. Because digital sculpting software is complex and difficult to learn, the course combines blend-based learning and example-based learning to enhance students’ motivation and learning outcomes. At the end of the course, 96 students were questionnaired and a total of 71 valid questionnaires were collected. 66.2% of students believe that digital sculpture is easier to create character models than 3D animation software, 60.6% of students rely on course videos to improve learning, and 58.9% of students think course videos are very useful. 69% of students think the sample design is interesting and shows the impact of the EBL design. The questionnaire was analyzed by factor analysis and summarized into three constructs. The results show that blend-based learning and example-based learning have a clear contribution to curriculum design, learning response and motivation.


Digital sculpt Zbrush Blend-based learning Example-based learning 


Conflict of Interest

The author states that there is no conflict of interest. The questionnaire was conducted anonymously and the participants were all adult students.


  1. 1.
    Garrison, D.R., Kanuka, H.: Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet High. Educ. 7(2), 95–105 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atkinson, R.K., Derry, S.J., Renkl, A., Wortham, D.: Learning from examples: instructional principles from the worked examples research. Rev. Educ. Res. 70(2), 181–214 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Autodesk Mudbox Homepage. Accessed 26 Feb 2019
  4. 4.
    Pixologic ZBrush Homepage. Accessed 26 Feb 2019
  5. 5.
    Ptex Homepage. Accessed 28 Feb 2019
  6. 6.
    Steyer, J.S., Boulay, M., Lorrain, S.: 3D external restorations of stegocephalian skulls using Zbrush: the renaissance of fossil amphibians. C.R. Palevol 9(6–7), 463–470 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ngan, O.M.Y., Tang, T.L.H., Chan, A.K.Y., Chen, D.M., Tang, M.K.: Blended learning in anatomy teaching for non-medical students: an innovative approach to the health professions education. Health Prof. Educ. 4(2), 149–158 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kanuka, H., Brooks, C., Saranchuck, N.: Flexible learning and cost effective mass offerings. In Improving University Teaching (IUT) conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Renkl, A.: Toward an instructionally oriented theory of example-based learning. Cogn. Sci. 38(1), 1–37 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gulwani, S.: Example-based learning in computer-aided STEM education. Commun. ACM 57(8), 70–80 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bliuc, A.M., Goodyear, P., Ellis, R.A.: Research focus and methodological choices in studies into students’ experiences of blended learning in higher education. Internet High. Educ. 10(4), 231–244 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jeffrey, L.M., Milne, J., Suddaby, G., Higgins, A.: Blended learning: how teachers balance the blend of online and classroom components. J. Inf. Technol. Educ. 13, 121–140 (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lamb, R., Antonenko, P., Etopio, E., Seccia, A.: Comparison of virtual reality and hands on activities in science education via functional near infrared spectroscopy. Comput. Educ. 124, 14–26 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Digital Multimedia DesignChina University of TechnologyTaipei CityTaiwan (R.O.C.)

Personalised recommendations