Agriculture and Nanoparticles

  • Nüket Altindal
  • Demet Altindal


Herbal, animal and agricultural activities that have been applied to meet human needs in harmony with nature throughout human history have not harmed the ecosystem and have not caused environmental problems. However, the current ecosystem balance continues to deteriorate as a result of classical agricultural practices to get more products from the unit area to meet the food needs of the rapidly growing population. Therefore, new approaches to agricultural production and techniques such as nanotechnology are needed. In this context, nanoparticles that form the basis of nanotechnology have emerged as a versatile platform for solving the problems encountered. Nanoparticles have the potential in agricultural applications to be used in plant nutrition, plant and animal breeding and in the fight against herbicides and harmful insects.


Agriculture Nanoparticle Field Plant Nanotechnology 


  1. Aldao DC, Šárka E, Ulbrich P, Menšíková E (2018) Starch nanoparticles-two ways of their preparation. Czech J Food Sci 36:133–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Samarrai AM (2012) Nanoparticles as alternative to pesticides in management plant diseases-a review. Int J Sci Res Publ 2(4):1–4Google Scholar
  3. Aras S, Soydam-Aydın S, Fazlıoğlu A, Cansaran-Duman D, Büyük İ, Derici K (2015) RNA interference in plants. Turk Hij Deney Biyol Derg 72(3):255–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhattacharyya A, Bhaumik A, Rani PU, Mandal S, Epidi TT (2010) Nano-particles – a recent approach to insect pest control. Afr J Biotechnol 9(24):3489–3493Google Scholar
  5. Dias MC, Santos C, Pinto G, Silva AMS, Silva S (2018) Titanium dioxide nanoparticles impaired both photochemical and non-photochemical phases of photosynthesis in wheat. Protoplasma 256(1):69–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. El-Ghamry AM, Mosa AA, Alshaal TA, ElRamady HR (2018) Nanofertilizers vs. biofertilizers: new insights. Environ Biodivers Soil Secur 2:51–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elmer W, White JC (2018) The future of nanotechnology in plant pathology. Annu Rev Phytopathol 56:111–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Faraji J, Sepehri A (2018) Titanium dioxide nanoparticles and sodium nitroprusside alleviate the adverse effects of cadmium stress on germination and seedling growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Univ Sci 23(1):61–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hao Y, Fang P, Ma C, White JC, Xiang Z, Wang H, Zhang Z, Rui Y, Xing B (2019) Engineered nanomaterials inhibit Podosphaera pannosa infection on rose leaves by regulating phytohormones. Environ Res 170:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hussain A, Ali S, Rizwan R, Rehman MZ, Javed MR, Imran M, Chatha SAS, Nazir R (2018) Zinc oxide nanoparticles alter the wheat physiological response and reduce the cadmium uptake by plants. Environ Pollut 242(Part B):1518–1526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hussein HS, Shaarawy HH, Hussien NH, Hawash SI (2019) Preparation of nano-fertilizer blend from banana peels. Bull Natl Res Cent 43:26. Scholar
  12. Jhanzab HM, Razzaq A, Bibi Y, Yasmeen F, Yamaguchi H, Hitachi K, Tsuchida K, Komatsu S (2019) Proteomic analysis of the effect of inorganic and organic chemicals on silver nanoparticles in wheat. Int J Mol Sci 20(4):825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Le VN, Rui Y, Gui X, Li X, Liu S, Han Y (2014) Uptake, transport, distribution and bio-effects of SiO2 nanoparticles in Bt-transgenic cotton. J Nanobiotechnol 12:50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. León-Silva S, Arrieta-Cortes R, Fernández-Luqueño F, López-Valdez F (2018) Design and production of nanofertilizers. In: López-Valdez F, Fernández-Luqueño F (eds) Agricultural nanobiotechnology. Springer, Cham, pp 17–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li W, Zheng Y, Zhang H, Liu Z, Su W, Chen S, Liu Y, Zhuang J, Lei B (2016) Phytotoxicity, uptake, and translocation of fluorescent carbon dots in mung bean plants. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:19939–19945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li R, He J, Xie H, Wang W, Bose SK, Sun Y, Hu J, Yin H (2019) Effects of chitosan nanoparticles on seed germination and seedling growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Int J Biol Macromol 126:91–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. López-Moreno ML, de la Rosa G, Hernández-Viezcas JÁ, Castillo-Michel H, Botez CE, Peralta-Videa JR, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2010) Evidence of the differential biotransformation and genotoxicity of ZnO and CeO2 nanoparticles on soybean (Glycine max) plants. Environ Sci Technol 44:7315–7320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ma X, Wang C (2010) Fullerene nanoparticles affect the fate and uptake of trichloroethylene in phytoremediation systems. Environ Eng Sci 27(11):989–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mahakham W, Theerakulpisut P, Maensiri S, Phumying S, Sarmah AK (2016) Environmentally benign synthesis of phytochemicals-capped gold nanoparticles as nanopriming agent for promoting maize seed germination. Sci Total Environ 573:1089–1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mahakham W, Sarmah AK, Maensiri S, Theerakulpisut P (2017) Nanopriming technology for enhancing germination and starch metabolism of aged rice seeds using phytosynthesized silver nanoparticles. Sci Rep 7:8263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marchiol L (2018) Nanotechnology in agriculture: new opportunities and perspectives. In: New visions in plant science. InTechOpen, London, pp 121–141. Scholar
  22. Mehta CM, Srivastava R, Arora S, Sharma AK (2016) Impact assessment of silver nanoparticles on plant growth and soil bacterial diversity. 3 Biotech 6:254PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Mukhopadhyay SS, Sharma S (2013) Nanoscience and nanotechnology: cracking prodigal farming. J Bionano Sci 7:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ogunyemi SO, Abdallah Y, Zhang M, Fuad H, Hong X, İbrahim E, Masum MMI, Hossain A, Mo J, Li B (2019) Green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using different plant extracts and their antibacterial activity against Xanthomonas oryzae pv. Oryzae. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol 47(1):341–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Oh JW, Chun SC, Chandrasekaran M (2019) Preparation and in vitro characterization of chitosan nanoparticles and their broad-spectrum antifungal action compared to antibacterial activities against phytopathogens of tomato. Agronomy 9(1):21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pathak VM, Kumar N (2017) Dataset on the superabsorbent hydrogel synthesis with SiO2 nanoparticle and role in water restoration capability of agriculture soil. Data Brief 13:291–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rajput V, Minkina T, Fedorenko A, Sushkova S, Mandzhieva S, Lysenko V, Duplii N, Fedorenko G, Dvadnenko K, Ghazaryan K (2018) Toxicity of copper oxide nanoparticles on spring barley (Hordeum sativum distichum). Sci Total Environ 645:1103–1113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Saharan V, Kumaraswamy RV, Choudhary RC, Kumari S, Pal A, Raliya R, Biswas P (2016) Cu-chitosan nanoparticle mediated sustainable approach to enhance seedling growth in maize by mobilizing reserved food. J Agric Food Chem 64(31):6148–6155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shinde S, Paralikar P, Ingle AP, Rai M (2018) Promotion of seed germination and seedling growth of Zea mays by magnesium hydroxide nanoparticles synthesized by the filtrate from Aspergillus niger. Arab J Chem.
  30. Siddiqi KS, Husen A (2016) Recent advances in plant-mediated engineered gold nanoparticles and their application in biological system. J Trace Elem Med Biol 40:10–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Siddiqui MH, Al-Whaibi M (2014) Role of nano-SiO2 in germination of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum seeds mill.). Saudi J Biol Sci 21(1):13–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Singh A, Singh NB, Afzal S, Singh T, Hussain I (2017) Zinc oxide nanoparticles: a review of their biological synthesis, antimicrobial activity, uptake, translocation and biotransformation in plants. J Mater Sci 53:185–201. Scholar
  33. Srivastava G, Das CK, Das A, Singh SK, Roy M, Kim H, Sethy N, Kumar A, Sharma RK, Singh SK, Philip D, Das M (2014) Seed treatment with iron pyrite (FeS2) nanoparticles increases the production of spinach. RSC Adv 4(102):58495–58504. Scholar
  34. Tang Y, He R, Zhao J, Nie G, Xu L, Xing B (2016) Oxidative stressinduced toxicity of CuO nanoparticles and related toxicogenomic responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Environ Pollut 212:605–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Taran N, Storozhenko V, Svietlova N, Batsmanova L, Shvartau V, Kovalenko M (2017) Effect of zinc and copper nanoparticles on drought resistance of wheat seedlings. Nanoscale Res Lett 12(1):60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Worrall EA, Hamid A, Mody AT, Mitter N, Pappu HR (2018) Nanotechnology for plant disease management. Agronomy 8:285. Scholar
  37. Zhang R, Meng Z, Abid MA, Zhao X (2018) Novel pollen magnetofection system for transformation of cotton plant with magnetic nanoparticles as gene carriers. In: Zhang B (ed) Transgenic cotton. Methods in molecular biology, vol 1902. Humana Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhao X, Meng Z, Wang Y, Chen W, Sun C, Cui B, Cui J, Yu M, Zeng Z, Guo S, Luo D, Cheng JQ, Zhang R, Cui H (2018) Pollen magnetofection for genetic modification with magnetic nanoparticles as gene carriers. Nat Plants 3:956–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nüket Altindal
    • 1
  • Demet Altindal
    • 2
  1. 1.Sivaslı Vocational School, Department of Crop and Animal Production, Programme of Medical and Aromatic PlantsUşak UniversityUşakTurkey
  2. 2.Fethiye Ali Sıtkı Mefharet Koçman Vocational School, Department of Crop and Animal Production, Organic Farming ProgrammeMuğla Sıtkı Koçman UniversityMuğlaTurkey

Personalised recommendations