Public-Private Partnerships to Improve Urban Environmental Services

  • Bharat DahiyaEmail author
  • Bradford Gentry
Part of the Advances in 21st Century Human Settlements book series (ACHS)


Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) are most usefully viewed as a tool, not a religion. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development introduces ‘partnership’ as one of the five critical dimensions of sustainable development, and lays emphasis on encouraging and promoting effective public, public-private and civil society partnerships. Within this larger context, the purpose of this chapter is to offer some thoughts on: (i) The reasons PPPs have generated such interest in the urban environmental arena; (ii) A way to understanding PPPs; (iii) The key features of successful PPPs; (iv) The current trends in and debate over PPPs in the urban water sector; and (v) Ways to make the best use of PPPs to help improve urban water services. The fact that private capital flows have remained above the Official Development Assistance flows since 2005—except 2015 and 2016, has sustained the interest of many parties in searching for profitable and impactful investment opportunities in urban environmental services. PPPs often start with questions vis-à-vis their goals, strengths and weaknesses, structure and processes. Successful PPPs often feature individual champions who address the tensions at the heart of many partnership efforts; partnership space or the context in which PPPs are formed; and optimized structures and processes that would respond to different urban environmental problems. Our analysis of the data (1990–2013) obtained from the World Bank’s Private Participation in Infrastructure Project Database shows that whilst the number of water projects steadily increased from 1990 to 2007, the private capital flows to urban water sector declined from US$37 billion during 1990–2000 to US$25 billion between 2001 and 2010. The reasons for this decline in international private investment are many and varied: (i) functioning of public sector and political systems; (ii) private sector and commercial realities; and (iii) opposition to private sector involvement. Moving forward will require action on at least two important and interrelated fronts: first is addressing the mayors’ dilemma about the choice of PPPs to improve urban environmental services, and second is assessing the performance of all partners.


Public-private partnerships Urban environment Private capital flows Partnership space Infrastructure and services Sustainable development SDG 11 Multi-stakeholder partnerships 


  1. African Development Bank (2001) Handbook on stakeholder consultation and participation in African Development Bank Operations. Environment and Sustainable Development Unit (OESU). Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire: African Development Bank. Available at:
  2. Angueletou-Marteau A (2008) Informal water suppliers meeting water needs in the peri-urban territories of Mumbai, an Indian perspective. Global changes and water resources: confronting the expanding and diversifying pressures: XIIIth world water congress, Sept, Montpellier, FranceGoogle Scholar
  3. Argo T, Laquian A (2007) The privatization of water services: effects on the urban poor in Jakarta and Metro Manila. In: Laquian A, Tewari V, Hanley L (eds) The inclusive city: infrastructure and public services for the urban poor in Asia. Woodrow Wilson Center Press/Johns Hopkins University Press, Washington, DC/Baltimore, MD, pp 224–248Google Scholar
  4. Ashley R, Cashman A (2006) The impacts of change on the long-term future demand for water sector infrastructure. Infrastructure to 2030: telecom, land transport, water and electricity. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, pp 241–347Google Scholar
  5. Asian Development Bank (2000) Developing best practices for promoting private sector investment in infrastructure: water supply. Asian Development Bank, MandaluyongGoogle Scholar
  6. Asian Development Bank (2008) Public-private partnership handbook. Asian Development Bank, ManilaGoogle Scholar
  7. Asian Development Bank (2009) ADB assistance for public-private partnerships in infrastructure development—potential for more success. Impact Evaluation Department. Asian Development Bank, MandaluyongGoogle Scholar
  8. Asian Development Bank (2014) Public-private partnerships in urbanization in the People’s Republic of China. Asian Development Bank, MandaluyongGoogle Scholar
  9. Asian Development Bank (2018) The office of public–private partnership. Asian Development Bank, Mandaluyong. Available at: Accessed 25 Aug 2019
  10. Bayliss K, van Waeyenberge E (2018) Unpacking the public private partnership revival. J Dev Stud 54(4):577–593. Scholar
  11. Bigio AG, Dahiya B (2004) Urban environment and infrastructure: toward livable cities. World Bank, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boardman AE, Vining AR (2012) The political economy of public–private partnerships and analysis of their social value. Ann Public Coop Econ 83:117–141. Scholar
  13. Campbell T (2012) Beyond smart cities: how cities network, learn and innovate. Earthscan Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Cashore B (2002) Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: how non-state market-driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule-making authority. Governance 15(4):503–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Centre for Science and Environment (2011) Water PPPs: are they here to stay? Available at: Accessed Oct 2014
  16. Chiplunkar A, Dueñas MC, Flor M (2008) Maynilad on the mend: rebidding process infuses new life to a struggling concessionaire. Asian Development Bank, Mandaluyong. Available at: Accessed 19 Nov 2019
  17. Cui C, Liu Y, Hope A, Wang J (2018) Review of studies on the public–private partnerships (PPP) for infrastructure projects. Int J Proj Manag 36(5):773–794.
  18. Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation and United Nations Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office (2019) Financing the UN development system: time for hard choices. Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation/United Nations Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office, Uppsala/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Dahiya B (2014) Southeast Asia and sustainable urbanization. Glob Asia 9(3):84–91Google Scholar
  20. Dahiya B, Okitasari M (2018) Partnering for sustainable development: guidelines for multi-stakeholder partnerships to implement the 2030 agenda in Asia and the Pacific. United Nations University, Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability (UNU-IAS)/UN-ESCAP, Tokyo/BangkokGoogle Scholar
  21. Delmon VR (2014) Structuring private-sector participation (PSP) contracts for small scale water projects. Water and Sanitation Program, International Finance Corporation and the World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  22. Development Workshop Angola (2009) The informal peri-urban water sector in Luanda. Report submitted to IDRC. Development Workshop Angola, LuandaGoogle Scholar
  23. Fischer R (2011) The promise and peril of public-private partnerships: lessons from the chilean experience. International Growth Centre Working Paper 11/0483. London School of Economics, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Focus on the Global South and Transnational Institute (2007) Water democracy: reclaiming public water in Asia—essay collection presented by the reclaiming public water network. Focus on the Global South/Transnational Institute, Bangkok/AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  25. Forest Stewardship Council (2015) FSC international standard: FSC principles and criteria for forest stewardship—FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2 EN. Forest Stewardship Council, BonnGoogle Scholar
  26. Forest Stewardship Council (2016) Standard setting in FSC—FSC-RP-standard setting V1-1. Forest Stewardship Council, BonnGoogle Scholar
  27. Geddes R (2011) The road to renewal: private investment in U.S. transportation infrastructure. American Enterprise Institute Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  28. Gentry B, Abuyuan A (2000) Global trends in urban water supply and waste water financing and management: changing roles for the public and private sectors. Working paper CCNM/ENV(2000)36/FINAL. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, ParisGoogle Scholar
  29. Graham S, Marvin S (2001) Splintering urbanism: networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Haase D, Guneralp B, Dahiya B, Bai X, Elmqvist T (2018) Global urbanization: perspectives and trends. In: Elmqvist T, Bai X, Frantzeskaki N, Griffith C, Maddox D, McPhearson T, Parnell S, Romero-Lankao P, Simon D, Watkins M (eds) Urban planet: knowledge towards sustainable cities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 19–44.
  31. Hall D (2002) Water in public hands. Public Services International Research Unit, Greenwich, United Kingdom (Working Paper)Google Scholar
  32. Hall D (2015) Why public-private partnerships don’t work: the many advantages of the public alternative. Public Services International Research Unit, University of Greenwich, United Kingdom. Available at: Accessed Aug 2019
  33. Hall D, Bayliss K, Lobina E (2002) Water privatization in Africa. Paper by the Public Services International Research Unit, University of Greenwich for the Municipal Services Project Conference, in Johannesburg, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  34. Hasibuan D (2007) Jakarta water privatization: workers campaign to bring back water in public hands. Asian Development Bank Forum on Water Privatization, KyotoGoogle Scholar
  35. Hodge GA, Greve C (2017) On public–private partnership performance: a contemporary review. Public Works Manag Policy 22:55–78. Scholar
  36. Jenny H (2008) You said private sector participation? Asian Development Bank, Manila. Available at: Accessed Nov 2010
  37. Jomo KS, Chowdhury A, Sharma K, Platz D (2016) Public-private partnerships and the 2030 agenda for sustainable development: fit for purpose? DESA Working Paper No. 148, ST/ESA/2016/DWP/148. United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Kharas H (2019) International financing of the sustainable development goals. In: Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation and United Nations Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office, Financing the UN Development System: Time for Hard Choices. Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation/United Nations Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office, Uppsala/New York, pp 71–73Google Scholar
  39. Kjellén M, McGranahan G (2006) Informal water vendors and the urban poor. Human settlements working paper series water no. 3. International Institute for Environment and Development, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Lanjekar P (2010) Public-private partnerships and urban water security: issues and prospects in Mumbai, India. Ritsumeikan J Asia Pacific Stud 27:167–176. Available at:
  41. Leigland J (2018) Public-private partnerships in developing countries: the emerging evidence-based critique. World Bank Res Obs 33(1):103–134.
  42. Manila Water (2019) Business profile. Available at: Accessed 21 Nov 2019
  43. Marx A (2019) Public-private partnerships for sustainable development: exploring their design and its impact on effectiveness. Sustainability 11(4):1087. Scholar
  44. Maynilad Water Services, Inc. (2017) History and transformation. Available at: Accessed 21 Nov 2019
  45. Medda FR, Carbonaro G, Davis SL (2013) Public private partnerships in transportation: some insights from the European experience. IATSS Res 36(2):83–87.
  46. Medhekar, A. (2014) Public-private partnerships for inclusive development: role of private corporate sector in provision of healthcare services. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci 157:33–44.
  47. Mehta A (ed) (2011) Tool-kit for public-private partnerships in urban water supply for the State of Maharashtra, India. Asian Development Bank, ManilaGoogle Scholar
  48. Ng ST, Wong JMW, Wong KKW (2013) A public private people partnerships (P4) process framework for infrastructure development in Hong Kong. Cities 31:370–381. Scholar
  49. Nicholson N (1998) How hardwired is human behavior? Harvard Bus Rev 76(4):135–147Google Scholar
  50. Nundy M, Baru RV (2008) Blurring of boundaries: public-private partnerships in health services in India. Econ Polit Wkly 43(4):62–71Google Scholar
  51. O’Neill P (2010) Infrastructure financing and operation in the contemporary city. Geograph Res 48(1):3–12. Scholar
  52. OECD (2019a) Discover the OECD: together we create better policies for better lives. Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris. Available at: Accessed 4 Aug 2019
  53. OECD (2019b) QWIDS—Query wizard for international development statistics. Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris. Available at:
  54. PADCO, Inc. (2002) A review of reports by private-sector-participation skeptics. Discussion Draft prepared for the Municipal Infrastructure Investment Unit, South Africa and USAIDGoogle Scholar
  55. Pangare G, Pangare V (2008) Informal water vendors and service providers in Uganda: the ground reality. The Water Dialogues. Available at: Accessed Dec 2014
  56. Patrinos HA, Barrera-Osorio F, Guáqueta J (2009) The role and impact of public-private partnerships in education. World Bank, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Perjo L, Fredricsson C, Oliveira e Costa S (2016) Public-private-people partnerships in urban planning. Working Paper (Deliverable 2.3.1 Potential and challenges of applying public-private-people partnership approach in urban planning), Baltic Urban Lab project, Interregg Central Baltic and European Union. Available at: Accessed 4 Sept 2019
  58. Petersen OH (2019) Evaluating the costs, quality, and value for money of infrastructure public-private partnerships: a systematic literature review. Ann Public Coop Econ 90(2):227–244. Scholar
  59. Plummer J, Waddell S (2002) Building on the assets of potential partners. In: Plummer J (ed) Focusing partnerships: a sourcebook for municipal capacity building in public-private partnerships. Earthscan Publications, London, pp 67–124Google Scholar
  60. Polaris Institute (2003) Global water grab. GATS ATTACK! Pamphlet Series, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  61. Pongsiri N (2012) Public-private partnerships and urban infrastructure development in Southeast Asia. In: Yap KS, Thuzar M (eds) Urbanization in Southeast Asia: issues & impacts. ISEAS Publishing and Centre for Liveable Cities, Singapore, pp 139–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. PPIAF (2018) Public-private infrastructure advisory facility—annual report 2018. Public-private infrastructure advisory facility. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  63. Rodriguez DJ, van den Berg C, McMahon A (2012) Investing in water infrastructure: capital, operations and maintenance. Water Partnership Program and the World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  64. Roehrich JK, Lewis MA, George G (2014) Are public–private partnerships a healthy option? A systematic literature review. Soc Sci Med 113(July):110–119. Scholar
  65. Siemiatycki M (2011) Urban transportation public-private partnerships: drivers of uneven development? Environ Plan A 43(7):1707–1722. Scholar
  66. Snell S (1998) Water and sanitation for the urban poor—small scale providers: typology & profiles. United Nations Development Program—World Bank Water and Sanitation Program, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  67. Solo TM (2003) Independent water entrepreneurs in Latin America: the other private sector in water services. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  68. Srinivasan K (2006) Public, private and voluntary agencies in solid waste management: a study in Chennai City. Econ Polit Wkly 41(22):2259–2268Google Scholar
  69. UNDP (2000) Joint venture public-private partnerships for urban environmental services: report on UNDP/PPPUE’s Project Development Facility (1995–1999). PPP working paper series vol II. United Nations Development Programme, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  70. UNDP (2006) Global lessons learned in PPPUE local level initiatives in support of pro-poor partnerships for basic urban service provision. Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  71. UNDP (2019) Public-private partnerships for service delivery. United Nations Development Programme. Available at:
  72. UN-ECE (2008) Guidebook on promoting good governance in public-private partnerships. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva. Available at: Accessed Aug 2019
  73. UN-ESCAP (2011) A guidebook on public-private partnership in infrastructure. Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok. Available at: Accessed Aug 2019
  74. UN-HABITAT (2013) State of the world’s cities 2012/2013: prosperity of cities. Routledge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. UN-HABITAT (2016) World cities report 2016—urbanization and development: emerging futures. UN-HABITAT, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  76. UN-HABITAT and UN-ESCAP (2010) The state of Asian cities 2010/11. UN-HABITAT, FukuokaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. United Nations (1992) Earth summit agenda 21, Chapter 33 (Finance). United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  78. United Nations (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. A/RES/70/1. Available at:
  79. United Nations (2017) The new urban agenda. A/RES/71/256. Habitat III and United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  80. United Nations (2019) Sustainable development goal 11: make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable. Available at:
  81. Waddell S (2002) Core competences: a key force in business–government–civil society collaborations. J Corp Citizensh 7(Autumn):43–56.
  82. Warner ME (2012) Privatization and urban governance: the continuing challenges of efficiency, voice and integration. Cities 29(Suppl 2):S38–S43.
  83. Water and Sanitation Program (2011) Trends in private sector participation in the Indian water sector: a critical review. Water and Sanitation Program, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  84. WHO (2006) Guidelines for drinking-water quality: first addendum to third edition, vol 1, recommendations. Available at: Accessed 14 Aug 2019
  85. WHO and UNICEF (2014) Progress on drinking water and sanitation—2014 update. WHO Press, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  86. WHO and UNICEF (2017) Progress on drinking water, sanitation and hygiene: 2017 update and SDG baselines. World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), Geneva. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGOGoogle Scholar
  87. Wong ELY, Yeoh E, Chau PYK, Yam CHK, Cheung AWL, Fung H (2015) How shall we examine and learn about public-private partnerships (PPPs) in the health sector? Realist evaluation of PPPs in Hong Kong. Soc Sci Med 147(December):261–269. Scholar
  88. World Bank (1997) Toolkits for private sector privatization in water and sanitation. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  89. World Bank (2003) Private participation in infrastructure: trends in developing countries in 1990–2001. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  90. World Bank (2006) Approaches to private participation in water services: a toolkit. Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility and the World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  91. World Bank (2014) Water PPPs in Africa. World Bank Group, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  92. World Bank (2017a) Public-private partnerships: reference guide version 3. World Bank, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. World Bank (2017b) Guidance on PPP contractual provisions. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  94. World Bank (2019a) A guide to community engagement for public-private partnerships: draft for discussion. International Finance Corporation, Washington, DC. Available at: Accessed 7 Sept 2019
  95. World Bank (2019b) List of thematic groups and leaders. World Bank Group, Washington, DC. Available at:,,contentMDK:20212529~pagePK:209023~piPK:207535~theSitePK:213799,00.html. Accessed 4 Aug 2019
  96. World Bank (2019c) Key issues in PPPs for the poor. Public-Private-Partnership Legal Resource Center. World Bank, Washington, DC. Available at: Accessed 7 Sept 2019
  97. World Bank, Asian Development Bank and Inter-American Development Bank (2014) Public-private partnerships: reference guide—version 2.0. World Bank, Asian Development Bank/Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC/MandaluyongGoogle Scholar
  98. World Economic Forum (2017) Harnessing public-private cooperation to deliver the new urban agenda. World Economic Forum, DavosGoogle Scholar
  99. Zen F (2018) Public–private partnership development in Southeast Asia. ADB Economics Working Paper Series No. 553. Asian Development Bank, MandaluyongGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Center for Integrated Sustainable Development, College of Interdisciplinary Studies, Thammasat UniversityBangkokThailand
  2. 2.Yale University School of Forestry & Environmental Studies and ManagementNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations