Advertisement

Governance for Urban Services in Vietnam

  • Nguyen Duc ThanhEmail author
  • Pham Van Long
  • Nguyen Khac Giang
Chapter
Part of the Advances in 21st Century Human Settlements book series (ACHS)

Abstract

The chapter investigates the relationship between local democracy and different forms of barriers to political and social inclusion of marginalized urban communities, particularly migrants living in slums areas in Vietnam. As a one-party regime, Vietnam had been a highly centralized state until early 1990s, with the government exerting tight control over the society. The launch of market-oriented “Doi moi” policy in 1986 has contributed to the country’s economic boom, lifting millions out of poverty, opening up the civic environment, and significantly improving the Vietnam’s public services. The government has allowed the private sector to engage in the provision of certain services, in addition to the previous state-controlled public service companies and state non-business organizations. Access to basic services like electricity, water, health and education has been much improved. However, economic growth has brought numerous significant social and political implications, particularly for the new social class of migrant workers. The government’s residence-based social policy created many barriers for marginalized groups, consisting mostly of migrants, to urban services including water and sanitation, health, education, and other socio—political rights that urban residents enjoy. The Vietnamese government has recently made significant efforts to remove the barriers, which were expected to make the accessibility of marginalized groups to urban services become easier, especially for immigrants. Nevertheless, the results are mixed and there is room for further policy improvement.

Keywords

Social inclusion Local democracy Decentralization Urbanization Marginalized Migration Vietnam 

References

  1. Anh VTT (2016) Vietnam decentralization amidst fragmentation. J Southeast Asian Econ 33(2):188–208Google Scholar
  2. Boushey H, Fremstad S, Gragg R, Waller M (2007) Social inclusion for the United States. Center for Economic and Social Inclusion, London. http://inclusionist.org/files/socialinclusionusa.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2013
  3. Cappo D (2002) Social inclusion initiative. Social inclusion, participation and empowerment. Address to Australian Council of Social Services National Congress, HobartGoogle Scholar
  4. Centre for Urban Forecast and Research (PADDI) (2014) Urban planning in Vietnam: comparison of method, tools, and implementation of urban planning in France and Vietnam. Labour-Society Publishing House, HanoiGoogle Scholar
  5. CIEM (2007) Public service reform in VietnamGoogle Scholar
  6. European Commission (2004) Joint report on social inclusion. Report 7101/04. Brussels: European commission. http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/socprot/soc-incl/joint_rep_en.htm. Accessed 12 Jan 2013
  7. General Statistics Office (GSO) (2017) Data on population and labour. Statistics Publishing House, HanoiGoogle Scholar
  8. General Statistics Office (GSO) (2018) Statistics on disposing solid waste and waste water by types of urban areas. http://www.gso.gov.vn/default_en.aspx?tabid=783. Accessed 12 Jan 2018
  9. Government Office (2016) Mở rộng nâng cấp đô thị Việt Nam [Upgrading Vietnamese urban areas]. Retrieved from Van Phong Chinh phu [Government Office]: http://vpcp.chinhphu.vn/Home/Mo-rong-nang-cap-do-thi-Viet-Nam/201610/20119.vgp
  10. Haughton J (2010) Urban poverty assessment in Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh city. United Nations Development Programe, Hanoi. http://dl.is.vnu.edu.vn/handle/123456789/94
  11. Hayes A, Gray M, Edwards B (2008) Social inclusion origins, concepts and key themes. Australian Institute of Family Studies, prepared for the Social Inclusion Unit, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim VT (2006) Strengthening the organic relationship among the party, the state, the Fatherland front and mass organizations to create a good foundation for implementing the mastery of the people. People’s Daily, May 20th, 2006Google Scholar
  13. Levitas R (2003) The imaginary reconstitution of society: Utopia as method. Paper presented at the University of Limerick/University of Ireland, Galway, as part of the Utopia-Method-Vision project led by Tom MoylanGoogle Scholar
  14. Marx V, Fleischer K (2010) Internal migration: opportunities and challenges for social economic development in Vietnam. United Nations Vietnam, HanoiGoogle Scholar
  15. MUTRAP (2009) The overall strategy for the development of the service sector in Vietnam by 2020 (CSSSD) and vision to 2025Google Scholar
  16. Ninh KNB, Anh VTT (2008) Decentralization in Vietnam: challenges and policy implication for sustainable growth. Research paper prepared for Vietnam competitiveness institute (VNCI) of United State Agency for International Development (USAID)Google Scholar
  17. Oxfam (2015) Summarized report: legal and practice barriers for migrant workers in their access to social protection. Program on work rights in Viet Nam. http://www.oxfamblogs.org/vietnam/2015/12/22/bao-cao-cua-oxfam-ve-rao-can-phap-luat-thuc-tien-doi-voi-nguoi-lao-dong-di-cu-trong-tiep-can-an-sinh-xa-hoi/
  18. Oxfam and ActionAid (2012) Participatory monitoring of urban poverty in Vietnam: five years synthesis report (2008–2012). HanoiGoogle Scholar
  19. Stewart A (2000) Social inclusion: an introduction. In: Askonas P, Stewart A (eds) Social inclusion: possibilities and tensions. Macmillan, London, pp 1–16Google Scholar
  20. UNFPA (2016) National domestic migration surveillance 2015: major findings. News Publishing House, HanoiGoogle Scholar
  21. Vietnam Academy of Social Sciences (VASS) (2015) Household registration system in VietnamGoogle Scholar
  22. Vietnam Environment Administration (2016) National report on environmentGoogle Scholar
  23. Vu TT, Zouikri M (2011) Decentralization and sub-national governance. Retrieved from Paris X University: http://www.vcharite.univ-mrs.fr/ocs/index.php/LAGV/LAGV10/paper/viewFile/562/34
  24. World Bank (2003) Transforming urban policy-making in Vietnam. World Bank, HanoiGoogle Scholar
  25. World Bank (2011a) Social safety nets in Nepal. Draft report. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  26. World Bank (2011b) Vietnam urbanization review. World Bank, HanoiGoogle Scholar
  27. World Bank (2013) Inclusion matters: The foundation for shared prosperity. New Frontiers of Social Policy, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. World Bank (2015) East Asia’s changing urban landscape: measuring a decade of spatial growth. World Bank, WashingtonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. World Bank (2016) Vietnam 2035. Toward prosperity, creativity, equity, and democracyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nguyen Duc Thanh
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pham Van Long
    • 1
  • Nguyen Khac Giang
    • 2
  1. 1.Vietnam Institute for Economic and Policy Research (VEPR), University of Economics and Business at Vietnam National UniversityCau Giay, Ha NoiVietnam
  2. 2.WellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations