Advertisement

Determinants of the Gap Between Desired and Actual/Expected Number of Children in Japan and South Korea

  • Ji-Hey BaeEmail author
Chapter
  • 25 Downloads
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Population Studies book series (BRIEFSPOPULAT)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the determinants of the gap between attitudes toward family size and actual/expected family size in Japan and South Korea. This study found that there is a gap between the desired and actual/expected number of children in both Japan and South Korea. Furthermore, the following common points and differences between the two countries were observed as factors that influence the discrepancy. In both Japan and South Korea, the employee benefits and family-related factors had no effect. It was observed that employment status was a point of difference between the two countries. In Japan, the gap was smaller for women employed regular workers than for unemployed women. By contrast, in South Korea, the woman’s employment status had no significant effect. This result suggests that the targets of countermeasures for low fertility will be different in each country. Finally, the effect of attitude-related factors was different in Japan and South Korea. However, there is a possibility of simultaneity bias in the association between having the desired number of children and attitudinal variables; therefore, it is necessary to be mindful of the causal relationships between variables. Future research might focus on the methodological problems, including validating the possibility of simultaneity bias.

Keywords

Family size Gap between ideal and reality Work-related factors Attitude-related factors 

References

  1. Bae, G. I., & Kim, K. S. (2012). A study on the influence of family values and birth policy on the wanted fertility rate. Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies, 43(3), 239–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cabinet Office of Japan. (2017). White Paper on Gender Equality 2017.Google Scholar
  3. Cha, K. W. (2005). The differences in household economic structure between low-fertility and birth-planned households. Journal of Korean Home Management Association, 23(2), 137–148.Google Scholar
  4. Do, N. H. (2018). Dongasia (Han-Jung-Il)ui Jeocyulsan Jeongchaek Byonhwawa Jaengjeom (The change and issues of east asian countries’ low fertility policy). Korea Institute of Child Care and Institute, 59, 38–45.Google Scholar
  5. Engelman, R., & E. Leahy. (2006). How many children does it take to replace their parents?: Variation in replacement fertility as an indicator of child survival and gender status. In Prepared for Population Association of American 2006 Annual Meeting, Session 102: New Ways of Looking at Fertility Measurement Challenges.Google Scholar
  6. Fukuda, S. (2014). Desired fertility in Japan: Evolutional patterns and outcomes over the life Course. IPSS Working Paper Series (J) No. 11.Google Scholar
  7. Hyundai Kyoungje Yeonkuwon. (2010). Himangjanyosuwa chulsanzanyosu kanui gyokcha haesoui haebob–Jeochulsan woninkwa taecheke daehan seolmuncyosarul jyunsimuro (Reducing the Gap Between Desired Number of Children and Actual Number of Children–Focusing the Survey about Causes and Countermeasures of Low Fertility). HyundaiKyoungjeYeonkuwon VIP REPORT 10–24.Google Scholar
  8. Iacovou, M., & Tavares, L. P. (2011). Yearing, learning, and conceding: reasons men and women change their childbearing intentions. Population and Development Review, 37(1), 89–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kim, S. J. (2019). A critical study on the population policy of korea in the low fertility and aging society. The Journal of the Korean Urban Geographical Society, 22(2), 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kong, S. Y. (2006). The influence of demographic and socioeconomic characteristics on fertility of married women after the 1997 economic crisis. Health and Social Science, 19, 119–149.Google Scholar
  11. Kong, S. H. (2008). Il-kazok yangrib hyusilkwa chulsanseontaek (The reality of work-family balance and the choice of childbirth). Gender Studies, 13, 65–86.Google Scholar
  12. Lee, S. J., & Moon, S. H. (2017). The analysis of factors that influence the first childbirth intentions among married working women in South Korea-focusing on working conditions and workplace pro-natal programs. Korean Journal of Family Social Work, 55, 129–155.Google Scholar
  13. Lee, J. Y., & Park, J. W. (2015). An analysis of ‘fertility gap’ in Korea: Focusing on the difference between real and desired children numbers. Korean Policy Studies Review, 24(4), 1–32.Google Scholar
  14. Matsue, A. (2012). Low fertility and policy interventions in South Korea. Journal of Population Problems, 68(3), 32–49.Google Scholar
  15. Matsuura, T. (2008). Naniga risoukodomokazuto genjitsukodomokazuno sawo umidasunoka (What cause the difference between the ideal number of children and the actual number of children). Japanese Journal of Research on Household Economics, 78(1), 52–60.Google Scholar
  16. McDonald, P. (2000). Gender equity, social institutions and the future of fertility. Journal of Population Research, 17(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare in Japan. (2017). Vital Statistics in Japan.Google Scholar
  18. Morita, Y. (2006). Kosodateni tomonau disincentiveno kanwasaku (Mitigation Measures for Disincentives Accompanying Child Rearing). In Y. Higuchi (Ed.), Syoshikato nihonno keizaisyakai (Low Fertility and Economic Society in Japan) (pp. 49–80). Tokyo: Nippon Hyoron Sha.Google Scholar
  19. Nishimura, T. (2012). What are the factors of the gap between desired and actual fertility?—A comparative study of four developed countries. Discussion Paper No. 81, School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University.Google Scholar
  20. Ohinata, M. (2015). Zōho Boseiai shinwa no wana (Trap of Maternity Love Myth). Nippon Hyoron Sha: Tokyo.Google Scholar
  21. Osawa, M. (2004). Pātotaimu rōdō no kokusai hikaku-kinkō shogū no genjō to shōrai-zō (International Comparison about Part-time Working-Current Situation of Balanced Treatment and Future Vision). Business Labor Trend, 2004(3), 2–6.Google Scholar
  22. Park, S. (2008). A study on the relationship of gender equity within family and second birth. Korea Journal of Population Studies, 31(1), 64–71.Google Scholar
  23. Presidential Committee on Aging Society and Population Policy. (2019). Change of the paradigm. Presidential committee on aging society and population policy homepage, 10 November, 2019. https://www.betterfuture.go.kr.
  24. Sakazune, S. (2015). A study of the gap between desired and actual number of children. Contemporary Society, 18, 117–124.Google Scholar
  25. Statistics Korea. (2016). Local area labour force survey.Google Scholar
  26. Shigeno, Y. (2006). Syurouto syussan, ikujino ryouritsu—kigyouno ikujisiento hoikusyono syussyouritsukaihukuen o kouka (Compatibility between Employment and Childbirth/ childcare—Effects of childcare support of company and nursery school on fertility recovery). In Y. Higuchi (Ed.), Syoshikato nihonno keizaisyakai (Low Fertility and Economic Society in Japan) (pp. 81–114). Tokyo: Nippon Hyoron Sha.Google Scholar
  27. Takayama, I. (2002). Institutionalization of preschool education and the myth of first three years—An analysis using JGSS-2000 data. JGSS Research Series, 1, 159–169.Google Scholar
  28. Van Peer, C. (2002). Desired and achieved fertility, in Klijzing. In E. M. Corjin (Ed.), Dynamics of fertility and partnership in Europe: Insights and lessons from comparative research volumeII (pp. 117–141). United Nations: New York and Geneva.Google Scholar
  29. Woo, H. B. (2018). Population policies in the era of low fertility-current state and future directions in South Korea. Korean Journal of Population Studies, 41(2), 31–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yamaguchi, K. (2009). Wākuraifubaransu: Jisshō to seisaku teigen (Work-life balance: Empirical analyses and policy recommendations). Tokyo: Nikkei Publishing Inc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.J. F. Oberlin UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations