Exploring Student Views and Perspectives Within a Changing Classroom Context: Developing Mathematical Inquiry Communities with Diverse Learners

  • Jodie HunterEmail author
  • Roberta Hunter
  • Rachel Restani


In many Western countries, an ongoing challenge for researchers and educators over the past decade has been persistent inequities in mathematics teaching and learning for particular groups of learners. A key issue related to equity is the exclusion of diverse learners’ culture, language and ways of being within mathematics classrooms. Within the New Zealand context, there is a changing student population that is increasingly culturally diverse. New Zealand student backgrounds include indigenous Māori students as well as the largest group of Pāsifika students in the Western world. Frequently, within the schooling system in New Zealand, the cultural background of both Māori and Pāsifika students has been perceived as a deficit and these students are ascribed low status and given related repetitive and procedural teaching. This chapter provides an exemplar of a professional learning and development approach that draws on students’ cultural and language backgrounds to induct the students into using a range of mathematical practices in the mathematics classroom. The chapter examines the changes in student views over one year beginning from the introduction of the strength-based approach. It uses the voices of diverse students to provide a window into understanding how such an approach can serve as a mechanism to support the development of a strong mathematical disposition as well as a positive cultural identity.


  1. Anthony, G. J., & Hunter, R. (2012). Re(thinking) and re(forming) mathematics teacher education. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 47(1), 145–151.Google Scholar
  2. Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2013). General capabilities in the Australian curriculum. Retrieved from Sydney,
  3. Battey, D., & Leyva, L. A. (2016). A framework for understanding whiteness in mathematics education. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 9(2), 49–80.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, R., & Reeves, B. (2009). Students’ recollections of participating in mathematical argumentation when doing mathematics. In R. Hunter, B. Bicknell, & T. Burgess (Eds.), Crossing divides (Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the mathematics education research group of Australasia) (Vol. 1, pp. 73–80). Palmerston North, NZ: MERGA.Google Scholar
  5. Civil, M. (2016). STEM learning research through a funds of knowledge lens. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(1), 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Civil, M., & Hunter, R. (2015). Participation of non-dominant students in argumentation in the mathematics classroom. Intercultural Education, 26(4), 296–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coxon, E., Anae, M., Mara, D., Wendt-Samu, T., & Finau, C. (2002). Literature review on Pacific education issues. Wellington: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  8. Di Martino, P., & Zan, R. (2011). Attitude towards mathematics: A bridge between beliefs and emotions. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 43(4), 471–482.Google Scholar
  9. English, L. D. (2015). STEM: Challenges and opportunities for mathematics education. In K. Beswick, T. Muir, & J. Wells (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, PME (pp. 4–18). Hobart, Tasmania.Google Scholar
  10. Ernest, P. (1989). The impact of beliefs on the teaching of mathematics. In P. Ernest (Ed.), Mathematics teaching: The state of the art (pp. 249–254). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  11. Featherstone, H., Crespo, S., Jilk, L., Oslund, J., Parks, A., & Wood, M. (2011). Smarter together! Collaboration and equity in the elementary math classroom. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  12. Ferme, E. (2018). A comparison of STEM and non-STEM teachers’ confidence in and attitudes towards numeracy. In J. Hunter, P. Perger, & L. Darragh (Eds.), Making waves, opening spaces (Proceedings of the 41st annual conference of the mathematics education research group of Australasia) (pp. 298–305). Auckland, New Zealand: MERGA.Google Scholar
  13. Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hodge, L. (2008). Student roles and mathematical competence in two contrasting elementary classes. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(1), 32–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hunter, J. (2017). Developing interactive mathematical talk: Investigating student perceptions and accounts of mathematical reasoning in a changing classroom context. Cambridge Journal of Education, 47(4), 475–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hunter, R., & Anthony, G. (2011). Forging mathematical relationships in inquiry-based classrooms with Pasifika students. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 4(1), 98–119.Google Scholar
  17. Hunter, R., & Hunter, J. (2018). Opening the space for all students to engage in mathematical practices within collaborative inquiry and argumentation. In R. Hunter, M. Civil, B. Herbel-Eisenmann, N. Planas, & D. Wagner (Eds.), Mathematical discourse that breaks barriers and creates space for marginalized learners. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Hunter, R., & Hunter, J. (2019). Maintaining a cultural identity while constructing a mathematical disposition as a Pāsifika learner. In E. A. McKinley & L. Tuhiwai Smith (Eds.), Handbook of Indigenous education. Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Hunter, R., Hunter, J., Bills, T., & Thompson, Z. (2016). Learning by leading: Dynamic mentoring to support culturally responsive mathematical inquiry communities. In J. Clark (Ed.), Opening up mathematics research (Proceedings of the 39th annual conference of the mathematics education research group of Australasia) (pp. 109–116). Adelaide: MERGA.Google Scholar
  20. Johnson, C. C. (2012). Four key premises of STEM. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 1–2. Scholar
  21. Kazemi, E., Franke, M., & Lampert, M. (2009). Developing pedagogies in teacher education to support novice teachers’ ability to enact ambitious instruction. In Crossing divides (Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the mathematics education research group of Australasia) (Vol. 1, pp. 12–30). Adelaide, SA: MERGA.Google Scholar
  22. Markovits, Z., & Forgasz, H. (2017). Mathematics is like a lion: Elementary students’ beliefs about mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(1), 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martin, D. B. (2009). Researching race in mathematics education. Teachers College Record, 111(2), 295–338.Google Scholar
  24. Ministry of Education. (2004). Book 3: Getting started. Wellington: Learning Media.Google Scholar
  25. Ministry of Education. (2013). Pasifika education plan 2013–2017. Retrieved from
  26. Moyer, J. C., Robison, V., & Cai, J. (2018). Attitudes of high school students taught using traditional and mathematics reform curricula in middle school: A retrospective analysis. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 98(1), 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers.Google Scholar
  28. Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change instance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pratt, N. (2006). ‘Interactive’ teaching in numeracy lessons: What do children have to say? Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(2), 221–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. RAND Mathematics Study Panel. (2003). Mathematical proficiency for all students: Towards a strategic research and development program in mathematics education. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar
  31. Rogoff, B., Coppens, A. D., Alcala, L., Aceves-Azuara, I., Ruvalcaba, O., Lopez, A., et al. (2017). Noticing learners’ strengths through cultural research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(5), 876–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  33. Sharma, S., Young-Loveridge, J., Taylor, M., & Häwera, N. (2011). The views of Pasifika students in New Zealand about communicating mathematically. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 31(4), 503–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. STEM Task Force Report. (2014). Innovate: A blueprint for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics in California public education. Dublin, California: Californians Dedicated to Education Foundation.Google Scholar
  35. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. Handbook of Qualitative Research, 17, 273–285.Google Scholar
  36. Tate, W. F. (2013). Race, retrenchment, and the reform of school mathematics. In E. Gutstein & B. Peterson (Eds.), Rethinking mathematics: Teaching social justice by the numbers (pp. 42–51). Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools.Google Scholar
  37. Turner, H., Rubie-Davies, C. M., & Webber, M. (2015). Teacher expectations, ethnicity and the achievement gap. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 50(1), 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wood, T., Williams, G., & McNeal, B. (2006). Children’s mathematical thinking in different classroom cultures. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(3), 222–255.Google Scholar
  39. Young-Loveridge, J., Taylor, M., Sharma, S., & Hawera, N. (2006). Students’ perspectives on the nature of mathematics. In P. Grootenboer, R. Zevenbergen, & M. Chinnappan (Eds.), Identities, cultures and learning spaces (Proceedings of the 29th annual conference of the mathematics education research group of Australasia) (Vol. 2, pp. 583–590). Adelaide, SA, MERGA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Massey UniversityAlbanyNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations