Comparison of Performance Metrics of Star Topology and Ring Topology in Wireless Sensor Network

  • Laxmipriya MoharanaEmail author
  • Bedanta Kumar Biswal
  • Raman Raj
  • Suraj Naik
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 109)


Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) is an emerging area of research and development. It promises a new domain of innovations with a lot many challenging issues in the field of networking. One of the popular areas of research in WSN is optimization strategies of routing protocols with respect to different performance matrices like throughput calculation between the sensor nodes, end to end delay between nodes, packet losses, Jitter and many more. In this paper, we have proposed two different topology models i.e. star topology and ring topology and calculated and plotted results of throughput between nodes, average throughput, delay, packet losses and jitter. The result shows a detailed comparison on the basis of average throughput, packet losses, Jitter and end to end delay between two topologies which comprises six sensor nodes connected through a wireless medium.


WSN NS2 Topology Throughput End to end delay Jitter 


  1. 1.
    Hodge VJ, O’Keefe S, Weeks M, Moulds A (2015) Wireless sensor networks for condition monitoring in the railway industry: a survey. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 16(3):1088–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nuffer J, Bein T (2006) Application of piezoelectric materials in transportation industry. In: Proceedings of Global symposium on innovative solutions for the advancement of the transport industry, San Sebastian, Spain, pp 1–11Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pourghodrat A (2011) Energy harvesting systems design for railroad safety. M.S. thesis, Department of Mechanical and Materials and Engineering, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lynch JP, Loh KJ (2006) A summary review of wireless sensors and sensor networks for structural health monitoring. Shock Vibrat Dig 38(2):91–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tolani M, Singh SRK, Shubham K, Kumar R (2017) Two-layer optimized railway monitoring system using Wi-Fi and zigbee interfaced wireless sensor network. IEEE Sens J 17(7):2241–2248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nguyen T-T, Shieh C-S, Dao T-K, Wu J-S, Hu Robot W-C (2013) Prolonging of the network lifetime of WSN using fuzzy clustering topology. In: Second international conference on vision and signal processing (RVSP)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sapidi R, Girard A (2013) Maximum achievable throughput in a wireless sensor network using in network computation for statistical functions. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw 21(5):1581–1594Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sinha P (2003) Throughput and energy efficiency in topology-controlled multi-hop wireless sensor networks. In: 2nd Second ACM international workshop on wireless sensor networks and applications (WSNA), San Diego, California, USAGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Santha Meena S, Manikandan J (2017) Study and evaluation of different topologies in wireless sensor network. In: International conference on wireless communications, signal processing and networking (WiSPNET), Chennai, India, March 2017Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Alam S, De D, Ray A (2015) Analysis of energy consumption for IARP, RIP and STAR routing protocols in wireless sensor networks. In: Second international conference on advances in computing and communication engineering, Dehradun, India, May 2015Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pramono S, Putri AO, Warsito E, Budi Basuki S (2017) Comparative analysis of star topology and multihop topology outdoor propagation based on quality of service (QoS) of wireless sensor network (WSN). In: IEEE international conference on communication, networks and satellite (Comnetsat), Semarang, Indonesia, Oct 2017Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Birla J, Sah B (2012) Performance metrics in ad-hoc network. IJLTET 1(1)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laxmipriya Moharana
    • 1
    Email author
  • Bedanta Kumar Biswal
    • 1
  • Raman Raj
    • 1
  • Suraj Naik
    • 1
  1. 1.Electronics and Communication Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringSiksha ‘O’Anusandhan (Deemed to be University)BhubaneswarIndia

Personalised recommendations