Advertisement

Kinematic and Static Structural Analysis of a Humanoid with a Wheeled Mobile Base

  • Manoj Kumar Mallick
  • A. P. SudheerEmail author
Conference paper
  • 55 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

Humanoid robots are facing issues such as self-collision, low speed, instability, and complex control system, when putting to work in different working environments. Humanoid robots with legs are generally not dynamically stable during high-speed motions. One of the solutions for avoiding this challenging issue is to replace the legs with wheelbase. This paper mainly deals with the development of a humanoid having a wheeled mobile base for indoor and outdoor applications. The upper body of the humanoid robot is designed with 3-DOF in the torso, 2-DOF in the neck, dual arm with 5-DOF in each arm, and mobile base with four wheels and 3-DOF. Forward and inverse kinematic modeling is done for the torso and arms. Workspace analysis is performed and the maximum work volume is 2.678 m3. Static structural analysis is carried out for dimension synthesis.

Keywords

Humanoid robot Wheeled mobile base Kinematic modeling Workspace analysis Static structural analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Yamashiro M, Xie Z, Yamaguchi H, Ming A, Shimojo M (2009) Home service by a mobile manipulator system. In: IEEE international conference on automation and logistics. IEEE, China, pp 295–300Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sakagami Y, Watanabe R, Aoyama C, Matsunaga S, Higaki N, Fujimura K (2002) The Intelligent ASIMO: system overview and integration. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and system, vol 3. IEEE, New York, pp 2478–2483Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fuchs M, Borst C, Giordano PR, Baumann A, Kraemer E, Langwald J, Gruber R, Seitz N, Plank G, Kunze K, Burger R (2009) Rollin’Justin-design considerations and realization of a mobile platform for a humanoid upper body. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation. IEEE, Japan, pp 4131–4137Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Diftler MA, Mehling JS, Abdallah ME, Radford NA, Bridgwater LB, Sanders AM, Askew RS, Linn DM, Yamokoski JD, Permenter FA, Hargrave BK (2011) Robonaut 2-the first humanoid robot in space. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation. IEEE, China, pp 2178–2183Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Borst C, Ott C, Wimbock T, Brunner B, Zacharias F, Bäuml B, Hillenbrand U, Haddadin S, Albu-Schäffer A, Hirzinger G (2007) A humanoid upper body system for two-handed manipulation. In: Proceedings on ieee international conference on robotics and automation. IEEE, Italy, pp 2766–2767Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    McGinn C, Cullinan MF, Otubela M, Kelly K (2019) Design of a terrain adaptive wheeled robot for human-orientated environments. Autonom Rob 43(1):63–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kaneko K, Kanehiro F, Kajita S, Hirukawa H, Kawasaki T, Hirata M, Akachi K, Isozumi T (2004) Humanoid Robot HRP-2. In: Proceedings IEEE international conference on robotics and automation. IEEE, USA, pp 1083–1090Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mizuuchi I, Yoshikai T, Sodeyama Y, Nakanishi Y, Miyadera A, Yamamoto T, Niemela T, Hayashi M, Urata J, Namiki Y, Nishino T (2006) Development of musculoskeletal humanoid Kotaro. In: Proceedings 2006 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation. IEEE, Florida, pp 82–87Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rojas S, Shen H, Griffiths H, Li N, Zhang L (2017) Motion and gesture compliance control for high performance of a wheeled humanoid robot. In: ASME 2017 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, United States, pp V04AT05A058–V04AT05A058Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Deepak BBVL, Parhi DR (2016) Control of an automated mobile manipulator using artificial immune system. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 28(1–2):417–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zannatha JI, Limon RC (2009) Forward and inverse kinematics for a small-sized humanoid robot. In: 2009 international conference on electrical, communications, and computers. IEEE, Mexico, pp 111–118Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ali MA, Park HA, Lee CG (2010) Closed-form inverse kinematic joint solution for humanoid robots. In: 2010 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems. IEEE, Taiwan, pp 704–709Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Winter DA (2009) Biomechanics and motor control of human movement, 4th edn. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Denavit J, Hartenberg RS (1955) A kinematic notation for lower-pair mechanisms based on matrices. Trans ASME J Appl Mech 23:215–221MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gavin H (2019) The Levenberg-Marquardt method for nonlinear least squares curve-fitting problems. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Duke UniversityGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Institute of Technology CalicutKozhikodeIndia

Personalised recommendations