Advertisement

Process Capability Improvement Using Internally Cooled Cutting Tool Insert in Cryogenic Machining of Super Duplex Stainless Steel 2507

  • D. Narayanan
  • T. JagadeeshaEmail author
Conference paper
  • 57 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

The present work deals with the influence of cryogenic coolants LN2 delivered through holes made on flank surface and rake surface of tungsten carbide cutting tool inserts in turning of super duplex stainless steel (SDSS) using in-house developed cryogenic setup. Experiments were conducted with the cryogenically treated tool, cryogenically treated tool with tempering and cryogenic coolant directly passed through a modified cutting tool insert. Results are compared with dry cutting conditions. The cutting conditions are low feed rate/high depth of cut, medium feed rate/medium depth of cut, and high feed rate/low depth of cut. The material removal rate and cutting speed is kept constant under all three cutting conditions. Microstructural study of the tool as received and cryogenically treated is examined using SEM. The population of harder tungsten carbide phase (gamma phase) is found to be more in the cryogenically treated tool. Due to tempering, the hardness of insert is improved by 8% which in turn increased tool life. By direct supply of LN2 through modified cutting tool increased tool life by 23%, more than the cryogenically tempered tool. There are no appreciable changes in the temperature of the cutting tool under dry cutting and cryogenically treated inserts. However, there is a large difference observed in temperature of cutting tool when LN2 is supplied through a modified insert directly, which in turn yielded high tool life.

Keywords

Cryogenically treated inserts Cryogenic machining Tool wear Cutting temperature 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been funded by the Kerala State Council for Science, Technology and Environment, Sanction No. KSCSTE/1452/2018-TDAPdated 16 October 2018.

References

  1. 1.
    Deshpande RG, Venugopal KA (2015) Machining with cryogenically treated carbide cutting tool inserts. In: International conference on materials processing and characterization, pp 1814–1824Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reddy TVS, Ajaykumar BS, Reddy MV, Venkataram R (2007) Improvement of tool life of cryogenically treated P-30 tools. In: Proceedings of international conference on advanced materials and composites (ICAMC-2007) at National Institute for Interdisciplinary Science and Technology, CSIR. Trivandrum, India, pp 457–460Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yong AYL, Seah KHW, Rahman M (2007) Performance of cryogenically treated tungsten carbide tools in turning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 46:2051–2056Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Isik Y (2016) Using internally cooled cutting tools in the machining of difficult-to-cut materials based on Waspaloy. Adv Mech Eng 8(5):1–8Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Paul S, Dhar NR, Chattopadhyay AB (2001) Beneficial effects of cryogenic cooling over dry and wet machining on tool wear and surface finish in turning AISI 1060 steel. J Mater Process Technol 116:44–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dhar NR, Paul S, Chattopadhyay AB Role of cryogenic cooling on cutting temperature in turning steel Trans. ASME J Mfg Sci EngGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bermingham MJ, Kirsch J, Sun S, Palanisamy S, Dargusch MS (2011) New observations on tool life, cutting forces and chip morphology in cryogenic machining Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51:500–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dilip Jerold B, Pradeep Kumar M (2013) The Influence of cryogenic coolants in machining of Ti-6Al-4V. ASME J Manuf Sci EngGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute of Technology CalicutCalicutIndia

Personalised recommendations