Blockchain-Based Image Sharing Application

  • Zhen-Kai Wong
  • Swee-Huay HengEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1132)


The major drawback of a centralised system is using a shared database among the network users. If a server failed to operate, then the whole system will be affected. Leakage of sensitive data such as name of user, home address and contact number is a big issue faced by most networking sites. In this research, a blockchain-based image sharing web application will be developed which makes the process of exchanging image more secure and reliable. Upon launching the application, users are strongly encouraged to publish their original image. Users can view all the published images on news feed. Besides, users are allowed to update their profile by changing the avatar and description of user profile. Since all images are stored by using InterPlanetary File System (IPFS), hence a little capacity is needed to save the related Uniform Resource Locator (URL) for retrieval purpose.


Blockchain Image sharing Interplanetary File System Ethereum 



The authors would like to acknowledge the Malaysia government’s Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS/1/2018/ICT04/MMU/01/01) for supporting this work.


  1. 1.
    AC3 Digital Wallet: Application (2018)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bashir, I.: The block validation mechanism. In: Mastering Blockchain. Packt (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    CNBC: Facebook and Google predicted to make $106 billion from advertising in 2017, almost half of world’s digital ad spend. CNBC (2017).
  4. 4.
    DiNucci, D.: Web 2.0. Wikipedia (2004).
  5. 5.
    freeCodeCamp: Yes, React is taking over front-end development. The question is why (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ganache: Truffle Suite. (n.d.).
  7. 7.
    Hackernoon: Top JavaScript trends to look for in 2019 (2018)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    IPFS: InterPlanetary File System. Wikipedia (n.d.).
  9. 9.
    MetaMask: MetaMask (n.d.).
  10. 10.
    Reuters: Why Facebook is losing the war on hate speech in Myanmar (2018)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Solidity: Layout of a Solidity source file. (n.d.).
  12. 12.
    Techworld, S.: The most infamous data breaches (2018)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    The Daily Dot: The hidden costs of YouTube’s controversial revenue split (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Truffle: Truffle Suite (n.d.).
  15. 15.
    Weibo, S.: An Introduction to Sina Weibo. What’s On Weibo (2015).
  16. 16.
    Wikipedia: WannaCry Ransomware attack. Wikipedia (2017).
  17. 17.
    Wikipedia: History of Facebook. Wikipedia (n.d.).
  18. 18.
    YouTube: YouTube monetized markets. YouTube Help (n.d.).
  19. 19.
    ArtistCore: U.S. Spotify per stream mechanical royalty rate (2017)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    SocialMediaHQ: Social media and the death of personal privacy (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Information Science and TechnologyMultimedia UniversityMelakaMalaysia

Personalised recommendations