Advertisement

Forestry Experiences and Feminist Institutionalism

  • Radha Wagle
  • Soma Pillay
  • Wendy Wright
Chapter
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter provides insights into the experiences of forestry workers within the framework of Feminist Institutionalism (FI). First, a brief review of the methods for collecting and analysing data is offered. In the second section, the ‘inclusion of women’ in forest bureaucracy is reconceptualized through perceptual data from interviews. In the third section, the organizational culture of the forest bureaucracy in Nepal is described under seven subheadings In the fourth section, Nepal’s forest bureaucracy is examined through the aspects of formal and informal institutions that support or hinder the inclusion of women in forestry organizations. The fifth section of this chapter presents the concept of structure and agency in forest bureaucracy, examined through the perspectives of the research participants. Next, the dynamics of power relations between male and female employees as ‘gender actors’ in Nepal’s forest bureaucracy are explored. In the subsequent section, some reflections based on observations, recorded in a daily journal during fieldwork, are briefly presented as a supplement to ideas generated from interviews and focus group discussions. Finally, the chapter is concluded with a summary of key points.

References

  1. Adams, A., & Bray, F. (1992). Holding out against workplace harassment and bullying. Personnel Management, 24(10), 48–52.Google Scholar
  2. Agarwal, B. (2010). Does women’s proportional strength affect their participation? Governing local forests in South Asia. World Development, 38(1), 98–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agarwal, B. (2015). The power of numbers in gender dynamics: Illustrations from community forestry groups. Journal of Peasant Studies, 42(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aguirre, D., & Pietropaoli, I. (2008). Gender equality, development and transitional justice: The case of Nepal. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 2(3), 356–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ateffakhr, L. (2016). A review of sexual harassment of women at workplace in the international documents. International Journal of Science and Research, 5(5), 1874–1876.Google Scholar
  6. Bacchi, C., & Rönnblom, M. (2014). Feminist discursive institutionalism—A poststructural alternative. NORA-Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 22(3), 170–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barling, J., Dekker, I., Loughlin, C. A., Kelloway, E. K., Fullagar, C., & Johnson, D. (1996). Prediction and replication ofthe organizational and personal consequences of workplace sexual harassment. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 11, 4–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bennett, L. (2008). Policy reform and culture change: Contesting gender, caste, and ethnic exclusion in Nepal. Inclusive States, 197.Google Scholar
  9. Bhattarai, K., Conway, D., & Shrestha, N. R. (2002). The vacillating evolution of forestry policy in Nepal: Historically manipulated, internally mismanaged. International Development Planning Review, 24(3), 315–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Hjelt-Bäck, M. (1994). Aggression among university employees. Aggressive Behavior, 20(3), 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Branch, S., Ramsay, S., & Barker, M. (2013). Workplace bullying, mobbing and general harassment: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(3), 280–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brandth, B., & Haugen, M. S. (2005). Doing rural masculinity–from logging to outfield tourism. Journal of Gender Studies, 14(1), 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chappell, L. (2006). Comparing political institutions: Revealing the gendered “logic of appropriateness”. Politics & Gender, 2(02), 223–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Christie, M. E., & Giri, K. (2011). Challenges and experiences of women in the forestry sector in Nepal. International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 3(5), 139.Google Scholar
  15. Chrysafi, P., Simou, E., Makris, M., Malietzis, G., & Makris, G. C. (2017). Bullying and sexual discrimination in the Greek health care system. Journal of Surgical Education, 74(4), 690–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Haas, S., Timmerman, G., & Höing, M. (2009). Sexual harassment and health among male and female police officers. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(4), 390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Einarsen, S. (2000). Harassment and bullying at work: A review of the Scandinavian approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5(4), 379–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Falch, A. (2010). Women’s political participation and influence in post-conflict Burundi and Nepal. Peace Research Institute Oslo: Oslo.Google Scholar
  19. Gilmour, D. A., & Fisher, R. J. (1991). Villagers, forests and foresters: The philosophy, process and practice of community forestry in Nepal. Kathmandu: Sahayogi Press.Google Scholar
  20. GoN. (1992). Civil Service Act. Kathmandu: Government of Nepal.Google Scholar
  21. GoN. (2008). Gender and social inclusion strategy for forestry sector. Kathmandu: Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation Nepal.Google Scholar
  22. GoN. (2011). Nepal’s implementation status of the convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women (CEDAW). Kathamndu: Nepal Women’s Commission, Government of Nepal.Google Scholar
  23. GoN. (2015). Constitution of Nepal. Kathmandu: Government of Nepal.Google Scholar
  24. Gurung, J. D. (2002). Getting at the heart of the issue: Challenging male bias in Nepal’s Department of Forests. Mountain Research and Development, 22(3), 212–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hobley, M. (1996). Participatory forestry: The process of change in India and Nepal. London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
  26. Jacob, S., Scherpereel, J. A., & Adams, M. (2014). Gender norms and women’s political representation: A global analysis of cabinets, 1979–2009. Governance, 27(2), 321–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kenny, M. (2013). A feminist institutionalist approach. In Gender and political recruitment (pp. 34–62). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Krook, M. L. (2010). Beyond supply and demand: A feminist-institutionalist theory of candidate selection. Political Research Quarterly, 63(4), 707–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Krook, M. L., & Mackay, F. (2015). Introduction: Gender, politics and institutions. In M. L. Krook & F. Mackay (Eds.), Gender, politics and institutions: Towards a fiminist institutionalism (pp. 1–20). London; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  30. Kunwar, L. B., Kunwar, B. B., Thapa, P., Sharma, I., Dhami, S. S., & Rokaya, L. J. (2014). Sexual harassment among females in working place at Dhangadhi municipality Kailali, District of Nepal. Global Journal of Medicine and Public Health, 3(3), 1–5.Google Scholar
  31. Lidestav, G., & Egan Sjölander, A. (2007). Gender and forestry: A critical discourse analysis of forestry professions in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 22(4), 351–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mackay, F., & Waylen, G. (2009). Feminist institutionalism. Politics & Gender, 5(02), 237–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mackay, F., Kenny, M., & Chappell, L. (2010). New institutionalism through a gender lens: Towards a feminist institutionalism? International Political Science Review, 31(5), 573–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Manchanda, R., & Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue. (2010). Nepali women seize the new political dawn: Resisting marginalisation after ten years of war. HD Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue.Google Scholar
  35. McLaughlin, H., Uggen, C., & Blackstone, A. (2012). Sexual harassment, workplace authority, and the paradox of power. American Sociological Review, 77(4), 625–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. MoFSC. (2015). Organization and management report. Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, Kathmandu.Google Scholar
  37. Norris, P. (2006). The impact of electoral reform on women’s representation. Acta política, 41(2), 197–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pant, B., & Standing, K. (2011). Citizenship rights and women’s roles in development in post-conflict Nepal. Gender and Development, 19(3), 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pathak, B. (2005). Politics of people’s war and human rights in Nepal. Kathamndu: Bimipa Publications.Google Scholar
  40. Rangan, H. (2000). Of myths and movements: Rewriting Chipko into Himalayan history. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Reed, M. G. (2003). Marginality and gender at work in forestry communities of British Columbia, Canada. Journal of Rural Studies, 19(3), 373–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shah, A. (2010). In the shadows of the state: Indigenous politics, environmentalism and insurgency in Jharkhand. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Studzinska, A. M., & Hilton, D. (2017). Minimization of male suffering: Social perception of victims and perpetrators of opposite-sex sexual coercion. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 14(1), 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sullivan, D. J. (1994). Women’s human rights and the 1993 World Conference on Human Rights. The American Journal of International Law, 88(1), 152–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tamang, S. (2009). The politics of conflict and difference or the difference of conflict in politics: The women’s movement in Nepal. Feminist Review, 91(1), 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Timsina, N. (2003). Viewing FECOFUN from the perspective of popular participation and representation. Journal of Forest and Livelihood, 2(2), 67–71.Google Scholar
  47. Tiwari, K. B. (1990). Historical review of forest management in Nepal (in Nepali Language). Kathmandu: Mrs Rami Tiwari.Google Scholar
  48. Varghese, J., & Reed, M. G. (2011). Theorizing the implications of gender order for sustainable forest management. International Journal of Forestry Research, 2012, 257280.Google Scholar
  49. Verge, T., & De la Fuente, M. (2014). Playing with different cards: Party politics, gender quotas and women’s empowerment. International Political Science Review, 35(1), 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Radha Wagle
    • 1
  • Soma Pillay
    • 2
  • Wendy Wright
    • 3
  1. 1.Ministry of Forests and EnvironmentKathmanduNepal
  2. 2.Federation Business SchoolFederation University Australia Berwick CampusMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.School of Health and Life SciencesFederation University AustraliaGippslandAustralia

Personalised recommendations