Advertisement

The Ultimate European Border: The Belt and Road Initiative Discovers Portugal

  • Francisco José B. S. LeandroEmail author
  • Paulo Afonso B. Duarte
Chapter
  • 33 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter argues that the Belt and Road Initiative (B&RI) makes a positive contribution to the implementation of the ‘de-bordering concept’ between China and European Union. Three central concepts of de-bordering, re-bordering and co-bordering are used as a starting point to argue that B&RI makes an unequivocal contribution to de-border the Sino-Portuguese boundaries. Furthermore, in this context, Portugal seems to be the ultimate border within the B&RI, bridging two non-contiguous intercontinental borders. In a context of hybrid and holistic borders, Portugal can play an unprecedented role in the Silk Road Economic Belt, as well as in the 21st Maritime Silk Road, while enabling China to maintain a strong presence within European borders.

Keywords

De-bordering, co-bordering and re-bordering China Portugal Belt and Road Initiative 

Bibliography

  1. BBC. (2018). Retrieved on December 19 from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-46386867.
  2. Blatter, J. (2001). Debordering the World of States: Towards a Multi-level System in Europe and a Multi-polity System in North America? European Journal of International Relations, 7(2): 175–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buzan, B. (2010). China in International Society: Is ‘Peaceful Rise’ Possible? The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 3(1): 5–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cancham News. (2018). Retrieved on December 19 from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-46386867.
  5. Castells, M. (2000). The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. Chauprade, A. (2003). Géopolitique: Constantes et Changements dans l’histoire, 2nd Edition. Paris: Ellipses.Google Scholar
  7. China’s Arctic Policy Paper. (2018). Retrieved on June 17 from http://english.gov.cn/archive/white_paper/2018/01/26/content_281476026660336.htm.
  8. Colin, S. (2015). Swinging Borders. In Valérie Gelézeau, Koen De Ceuster, and Alain Delissen (Eds.), De-bordering Korea—Tangible and Intangible Legacies of the Sunshine Policy. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Delissen, A. (2015). De-bordering Korea—Tangible and Intangible Legacies of the Sunshine Policy. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Dodds, Klaus (2007). Geopolitics—A Very Short Introduction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duarte, P. (2017). Pax Sinica. Lisbon: Chiado Editora.Google Scholar
  12. Duarte, P. (2018). Conclusion: The One Belt One Road in the Politics of Fear and Hope. Conclusion written by Paulo Duarte and Li Xing. pp. 279–289. In Li Xing (Ed.), Mapping China’s ‘One Belt One Road’ Initiative. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Duarte, P. (2019a). A Faixa e Rota e o Caráter Cíclico da História, pp. 56–57. In Janus 2018–19. A Dimensão Externa da Segurança Interna. Lisboa: Observare-Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa.Google Scholar
  14. Duarte, P. (2019b). Whose Silk Road? The Chinese, US, European Union and Russian Strategic Projects for Regional Integration in Central Asia, pp. 38–49. In C. Mendes (Ed.), The New Silk Road in the Context of East Asian Relations and Wider International Implications. Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Duarte, P. (2019c). Portugal na Faixa e Rota: Oportunidades e Desafios, pp. 58–59. In Janus 2018–19. A Dimensão Externa da Segurança Interna. Lisboa: Observare-Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa.Google Scholar
  16. European Union Commission. (2018). Retrieved on November 17 from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-85-38_en.htm.
  17. Flint, C. (2006). Introduction to Geopolitics. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gelézeau, V. (2015). Life on the Lines—People and Places of the Korean Border. In Valérie Gelézeau, Koen De Ceuster, and Alain Delissen (Eds.), De-bordering Korea—Tangible and Intangible Legacies of the Sunshine Policy. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Genova, N. (2017). The Borders of “Europe”: Autonomy of Migration, Tactics of Bordering. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson, D. E., and Michaelsen, S. (1997). The Limits of Cultural Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kristof, L. (1959). The Nature of Frontiers and Boundaries. Chicago: University of Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Laroche, J. (2017). The Brutalization of the World, from the Retreat of States to Decivilization. Paris: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leandro, F. (2018). Steps of Greatness: The Geopolitics of OBOR. Macau, China: University of Macau and Macau Institute of European Studies.Google Scholar
  24. Le Corre, P. (2018). A era dourada da China em Portugal. Retrieved on June 17 from https://www.publico.pt/2018/12/04/economia/opiniao/dourada-china-portugal-1852751.
  25. Longo, M. (2017). The Politics of Borders: Sovereignty, Security, and the Citizen After 9/11. Leiden: Leiden University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lugo, A. (1997). Reflections on Border Theory, Culture, and the Nation. In D. E. Johnson and S. Michaelsen (Eds.), The Limits of Cultural Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  27. MacCall, C. (2012). Debordering and Rebordering the United Kingdom. In T. Wilson and H. Donnan (Eds.), A Companion Border Studies. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  28. Marcu, S. (2015). Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles n.º 69, 211–232.Google Scholar
  29. Mostov, J. (2008). Soft Borders: Rethinking Sovereignty and Democracy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. The Pan-Asia Railway Network. (2018). Retrieved on December 19 from https://photos.nomadicnotes.com/img/s7/v163/p368258383.png.
  31. Ulc, O. (1996). Czechoslovakiaʼs Velvet Divorce. East European Quarterly, 30(3): 331–352.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francisco José B. S. Leandro
    • 1
    Email author
  • Paulo Afonso B. Duarte
    • 2
  1. 1.City University of Macau (CityU)Macau SARPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Centre for Research in Political ScienceUniversity of MinhoBragaPortugal

Personalised recommendations