Advertisement

Power System Security Analysis Using FACTS Devices by Means of Intelligent and Hybrid Techniques Under Different Loading Conditions

  • S. Venkata PadmavathiEmail author
  • A. Jayalaxmi
  • Sarat Kumar Sahu
Conference paper
  • 27 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 626)

Abstract

Power system security issue is a severe concern in restructured power market. In order to conserve the security of a system, flexible alternating current transmission system (FACTS) apparatus are one of the options. In this work, node voltage deviations and line apparent power flow factors are taken as the security indices and these are considered as objectives for security problems. The devices considered are thyristor-controlled series capacitors (TCSCs), static VAR compensators (SVCs), and unified power flow controllers (UPFCs). The main idea of this work is to compare distinct algorithms such as hybrid differential evolution (DEPSO) and fuzzy adaptive gravitational search algorithm (FAGSA) to attain the good location of the devices on IEEE 30 bus network with loading conditions.

Keywords

DEPSO FAGSA FACTS TCSC SVC UPFC 

References

  1. 1.
    N.G. Hingorani, L. Gyugyi, Understanding FACTS: Concepts & Technology of Flexible AC Transmission Systems (Wiley-IEEE Press, New York, 2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Berizzi, M. Delfanti, P. Marannino, M. Savino, M. Pasquadibisceglie, A. Silvestri, Enhanced security-constrained OPF with FACTS devices. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 20(3), 1597–1605 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Zarate-Minano, A.J. Conejo, F. Milano, OPF-based security redispatching including FACTS devices. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2(6), F821–F833 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. Yorino, E. El-Araby, H. Sasaki, S. Harada, A new formulation for FACTS allocation for security enhancement against voltage collapse. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 18(1), 3–10 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Venkata Padmavathi, S.K. Sahu, A. Jayalaxmi, Modeling and simulation of static var compensator to enhance the power system security, in IEEE International Conference (Asia Pacific Conference), IEEE Proceedings, pp. 52–55 (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Ambriz-perez, E. Acha, C.R. Fuerte-Esquivel, Advanced SVC models for Newton-Raphson load flow and Newton optimal power flow studies. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 15(1), 129–136 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Venkata Padmavathi, S.K. Sahu, A. Jayalaxmi, Power system security analysis using firing angle control model of FACTS devices. Int. J. Darshan Inst. Eng. Res. Emerg. Technol. 3(2), 37–42 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Venkata Padmavathi, S.K. Sahu, A. Jayalaxmi, Power system security improvement by using fuzzy adaptive gravitational search algorithm based FACTS devices under fault condition. International Springer Conference on Soft Computing in Data Analytics, Published in—Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (AISC), Springer Series (2018), pp. 95–106Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    H.R. Baghaee, B. Vahidi, S. Jazebi, G.B. Gharehpetian, A. Kashefi, Power system security improvement by using differential evolution algorithm based FACTS allocation. IEEE Power India Conference Proceedings, New Delhi, pp. 1–6 (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Kennedy. R. Eberhart, Particle swarm optimization, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural networks (Perth, 1995), pp. 1942–1948Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. Ghahremani, I. Kamwa, Optimal placement of multiple-type FACTS devices to maximize power system loadability using a generic graphical user interface. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 28(2), 1–15 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A.L. Ara, A. Kazemi, S.A.N. Niaki, Multiobjective optimal location of FACTS shunt-series controllers for power system operation planning. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 27(2), 481–490 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. Gerbex, R. Cherkaoui, A.J. Germond, Optimal location of multi-type FACTS devices in a power system by means of genetic algorithms. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 16(3), 537–544 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. Venkata Padmavathi, S.K. Sahu, A. Jayalaxmi, Comparison of hybrid differential evolution algorithm with genetic algorithm based power system security analysis using FACTS. J. Electr. Syst. 11(2), 189–202 (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    K. Gnanambal, N.S. Marimuthu, C.K. Babulal, A hybrid differential evolution to solve power flow problem in rectangular coordinate. J. Electr. Syst. 395–406 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. Venkata Padmavathi, S.K. Sahu, A. Jayalaxmi, Hybrid differential evolution algorithm based power system security analysis using FACTS. J. Electr. Eng. 15(1), 1–10 (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    E. Rashedi, H. Nezamabadi-Pour, S. Saryazdi, GSA: A gravitational search algorithm. Inf. Sci. 179(13), 2232–2248 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. Bhattacharya, P.K. Roy, Solution of multi-objective optimal power flow using gravitational search algorithm. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 6(8), 751–763 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. Vijay Kumar, D.M.V. Kumar, K. Edukondalu, Strategic bidding using fuzzy adaptive gravitational search algorithm in a pool based electricity market. Appl. Soft Comput. 13(5), 2445–2455 (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    P. Preedavichit, S.C. Srivastava, Optimal reactive power dispatch considering FACTS devices. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 251–257 (1998)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    M. Saravanan, S.M.R. Slochanal, P. Venkatesh, J.P.S. Abraham, Application of particle swarm optimization technique for optimal location of FACTS devices considering cost of installation and system loadability. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 77(9), 276–283 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    S. Venkata Padmavathi, S.K. Sahu, A. Jayalaxmi, Adaptive fuzzy particle swarm optimization coordination of FACTS devices to enhance the power system security. J. Electr. Eng. 15(3), 1–12 (2015)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    S. Venkata Padmavathi, S.K. Sahu, A. Jayalaxmi, Particle swarm optimization based control setting of TCSC for improving reliability of composite power system. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 55(14), 36–39 (2012)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    S. Venkata Padmavathi, S.K. Sahu, A. Jayalaxmi, Application of gravitational search algorithm to improve power system security by optimal placement of FACTS devices. J. Electr. Syst. 11(3), 326–342 (2015)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    H. Saadat, Power System Analysis (WCB/McGraw-Hill, New Delhi, 1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Venkata Padmavathi
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. Jayalaxmi
    • 2
  • Sarat Kumar Sahu
    • 3
  1. 1.EEE DepartmentGITAM (Deemed to Be University)HyderabadIndia
  2. 2.EEE DepartmentJawaharlal Nehru Technological University, College of EngineeringKukatpally, HyderabadIndia
  3. 3.EEE DepartmentM.V.G.R Engineering CollegeVizianagaramIndia

Personalised recommendations