Quantitative evaluation of PFS (Partial Floating Sheet-pile) Method under liquefaction

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 62)


The Partial Floating Sheet-pile (PFS) method is one of the methods to install the sheet-piles near the toe of an embankment as a countermeasure to inhibit the embankment on the soft ground from settling. This method is a combination of partially floating sheet-piles with the end bearing sheet-piles. Originally, the PFS method was developed as an anti-consolidation countermeasure to inhibit settlement by the weight of a river embankment in a residential area. As the ground includes a sandy soil layer, the PFS method could be effective against not only over-consolidation but also liquefaction. However, there are still the needs for quantitative discussions to clarify the effectiveness against liquefaction. Therefore, the authors carried out numerical analyses using LIQCA3D17 in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the PFS method quantitatively. As a result, a settlement of embankment is inhibited by the application of PFS method as much as the conventional sheet-piles method.


Partial Floating Sheet-pile method PFS liquefaction three dimensions numerical analysis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Biot, M. (1962). Mechanics of deformation and acoustic propagation in porous media. Journal of Applied Physics, 33(4).Google Scholar
  2. Fujiwara, K., Koseki. J., Otsushi, K. & Nakayama, H. (2013). Study on reinforcement method of levees using steel sheet-piles. Foundation and soft ground Engineering Conference. Thu Dau Mot University ICTDMU-1, 281–289.Google Scholar
  3. LIQCARI (2017). LIQCA2D17-3D17. LIQCA Liquefaction Geo Research Institute.Google Scholar
  4. Nakai, K., Noda, T. and Kato, K. (2017). Seismic assessment of sheet pile reinforcement effect on river embankments constructed on a soft foundation ground including soft estuarine clay: Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1(1), 1375–1396.Google Scholar
  5. Oka, F., Yashima, A., Shibata, T., Kato., M. & Uzuoka, R. (1994). FEM-FDM coupled liquefaction analysis of a porous soil using an elasto-plastic model. Applied Scientific Research, 52, pp 209–245.Google Scholar
  6. Oka, F., Yashima, A., Tateishi, A., Taguchi, Y. & Yamashita, A. (1999). A cyclic elasto-plastic constitutive model for sand considering a plastic-strain dependence of the shear modulus. Geotechnique, 49(5).Google Scholar
  7. Otani, J. (2017). A new sheet-pile method for countermeasures against the settlement of embankment on soft ground -Development of PFS Method-. IPA News Letter, Volume 2, Issue 3, 8.Google Scholar
  8. Shirai, S., Toyota, H. & Takada, S. (2014) um2014_pdf/3-207.pdf (in Japanese)
  9. Yamamoto, S., Kasama, K., Ohno, M. & Tanabe, You. (2018). Seismic behavior of the river embankment improved with steel sheet piling method. Proceeding of the first international conference on press-in engineering, Kochi, pp 227–232.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tokai UniversityHiratsukaJapan
  2. 2.Nagoya UniversityNagoyaJapan
  3. 3.Giken Ltd.TokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations