Advertisement

The Feedback Channels in a DMO: Case Study in Porto and North Tourism Association

  • Dália LiberatoEmail author
  • Bárbara Carvalho
  • Pedro Liberato
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 171)

Abstract

Over the last decades, the tourism sector has seen progressive exponential growth, which has consolidated its position in the world as one of the most important economic activities. The main information sources should be privileged, as they will be an essential bridge of contact, gathering information and clarifying contacts between the destination and potential demand, but also for tourists already at the destination. The main objective of this study is to understand which feedback channels exist in a back-office environment, in the “Hospitality and commercialization” department of the Porto Tourism Association, A.R. - Porto Convention & Visitors Bureau. In addition, it will also be objective to understand how demand behaves through each input channel. In order to meet the objectives of this study, two possible analyses were created - one concerning the back-office sales in 2018, and the other related to requests for information via Live Chat tool, between November 2018 and March 2019. 338 contacts were verified which resulted through back-office sales (from 11 feedback channels) and 4196 conversations started in the live tool existing on the Visit Porto and Visit Porto and North websites. The data collected confirm that tourists prioritize three main feedback channels - Chat, Email - visitportoandnorth and Telephone. Chat and Telephone channels are mainly used by families and groups of friends, who search for cruises, prefer short stays and book shortly in advance, in the same month of the visit or just the previous month. On the other hand, the email - visitportoandnorth channel, mainly prioritized for more professional and business visits, is used by travel agencies (TA)/tour operators (TO), valuing the advance and investing in organized and tailored circuits concerning the destination visit.

Keywords

Tourism Communication Feedback channels Non-presential Attendance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Turismo do Porto e Norte de Portugal.: Plano Estratégico Horizonte 2015-2020. Available: http://www.portoenorte.pt/pt/informacao-institucional/plano-estrategico/ (2019).
  2. 2.
    Associação de Turismo do Porto e Norte.: Visit Porto & North [online]. Available: http://www.visitportoandnorth.travel/ (2013).
  3. 3.
    Pereira, S. S.: Turismo. Porto e Norte com maior crescimento a nível nacional. Dinheiro Vivo [online]. 14 de Fevereiro. Available: https://www.dinheirovivo.pt/empresas/turismo-porto-e-norte-com-o-maior-crescimento-a-nivel-nacional/ (2019).
  4. 4.
    United Nations World Tourism Organization.: Market Intelligence and Competitiveness – conceptual framework [online]. UNWTO: Madrid. Disponível em http://marketintelligence.unwto.org/content/conceptual-framework-0 (2019).
  5. 5.
    Associação de Turismo do Porto e Norte.: About the Associação de Turismo do Porto [online]. Available: http://www.visitportoandnorth.travel/ATP/Sobre-a-Associacao-de-Turismo-do-Porto (2019).
  6. 6.
    United Nations World Tourism Organization.: World Tourism Day – Tourism in the Digital Era. UNWTO: Madrid. Available: http://wtd.unwto.org/content/wtd-2018-tourism-digital-era (2018).
  7. 7.
    World Tourism Organization Affiliate Members.: Technology in Tourism. AM Reports, 1. (2011).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    No, E. & Kim, J. K.: Comparing the attributes of online tourism information sources. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 564-575.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.063 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ramos, C., Rodrigues, P. & Perna, F.: Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informação no Sector Turístico. Revista Turismo e Desenvolvimento, 12, 21-32. (2009).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gohr, C. F., Santos, L. C. & Veiga, M. F.: A informação como um elemento chave para a qualidade do produto turístico: uma análise dos postos de informações turística do município de Florianóspolis/SC. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, 14 (2), 169-186. (2009).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schweda, A. & Varan, D.: Independent International Traveller Evaluations of Traditional and Interactive Holiday Information Sources Along Temporal and Utility Dimensions. In Frew, A.J. (ed.), Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2004, Vienna: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0594-8_15. (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hwang, Y., Jani, D. & Jeong, H. K.: Analyzing international tourists’ functional information needs: A comparative analysis of inquiries in an on-line travel forum. Journal of Business Research, 66 (6), 700-705.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.09.006. (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fesenmaier, D. R. & Jeng, J.: Assessing Structure in the Pleasure Trip Planning Process. Tourism Analysis, 5 (1), 13-27. (2000).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Singha, S. & Swait, J.: Channels for search and purchase: Does mobile Internet matter? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 39, 123-134.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.05.014 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chloe, Y., Kim, J. & Fesenmaier, D. R.: Use of social media across the trip experience: An application of latent transition analysis. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 34 (4), 431-443.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2016.1182459. (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liberato, P., Alén-González, E. & Liberato, D.: Digital Technology in a Smart Tourist Destination: The Case of Porto. Journal of Urban Technology, 25 (1), 76-97.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2017.1413228. (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    United Nations World Tourism Organization.: 1st UNWTO World Conference on Smart Destinations. UNWTO: Madrid. Available: http://cf.cdn.unwto.org/sites/all/files/docpdf/outcomedocument1stunwtoworldconferenceonsmartdestinationfinal.pdf (2017).
  18. 18.
    United Nations World Tourism Organization.: 3rd UNWTO/UNESCO World Conference on Tourism and Culture: for the Benefit of All. UNWTO: Madrid. Disponível em: http://ethics.unwto.org/event/3rd-unwtounesco-world-conference-tourism-and-culture-benefits-all (2018).
  19. 19.
    World Committee on Tourism Ethics.: Recommendations on the Responsible Use of Ratings and Reviews on Digital Platforms [online]. Disponível em: http://cf.cdn.unwto.org/sites/all/files/docpdf/wcterecommendationsratingsandreviewsenweb.pdf (2017).
  20. 20.
    International Trade Centre & World Tourism Organization.: Tourism and Trade: a global agenda for sustainable development. Available: http://www.intracen.org/uploadedFiles/intracenorg/Content/Publications/Tourism_and_Trade__low%20res_2014-2015-335.pdf (2015).
  21. 21.
    Jeng, J. and Fesenmaier, D.R.: Conceptualizing the travel decision-making hierarchy: a review of recent developments, Tourism Analysis, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 15-32 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gursoy, D. and McCleary, K.W.: An integrative model of tourists’ information search behavior, Annals of Tourism Research, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 353-373 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Barta, R., Feilmayr, C., Pröll, B., Grün, C. and Werthner, H.: Covering the semantic space of tourism – an approach based on modularized ontologies. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Context, Information and Ontologies Heraklion, ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, New York, NY (2009).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dália Liberato
    • 1
    Email author
  • Bárbara Carvalho
    • 1
  • Pedro Liberato
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Hospitality and Tourism of Polytechnic Institute of Porto (ESHT)Vila do CondePortugal

Personalised recommendations