Advertisement

Optimal Design of Robotic Mechanism

  • Tao SunEmail author
  • Shuofei Yang
  • Binbin Lian
Chapter
  • 13 Downloads
Part of the Springer Tracts in Mechanical Engineering book series (STME)

Abstract

Optimal design of robotic mechanism is the process of adjusting the structural parameters to achieve optimal performances while keeping them from not violating mechanism constraints [1, 2, 3]. This is the step of connecting the mechanism property to the application requirements of the robot. For instance, the robot being applied in manufacturing such as machining and milling is required to be equipped with high stiffness but low weight [4]. Hence, the stiffness and dynamic performances of the robot are considered in the optimal design and regarded to be either objectives or constraints. Corresponding performance models containing the relations between structural parameters and the performances built in the previous chapters are applied. By changing the structural parameters which are called design variables in the optimal design, the optimal performances of the robot meeting the application requirements can be achieved with the aid of optimization algorithm [5, 6, 7, 8].

References

  1. 1.
    Gao Z, Zhang D (2015) Performance analysis, mapping and multiobjective optimization of a hybrid robotic machine tool. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 62(1):423–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kelaiaia R, Company O, Zaatri A (2012) Multi-objective optimization of a linear Delta parallel robot. Mech Mach Theory 50:159–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Menon C, Vertechy R, Markot MC et al (2009) Geometrical optimization of parallel mechanisms based on natural frequency evaluation: application to a spherical mechanism for future space applications. IEEE Trans Rob 25(1):12–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sun T, Lian BB (2018) Stiffness and mass optimization of parallel kinematic machine. Mech Mach Theory 120:73–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liang D, Song YM, Sun T et al (2016) Optimum design of a novel redundantly actuated parallel manipulator with multiple actuation modes for high kinematic and dynamic performance. Nonlinear Dyn 83:631–658MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xie FG, Liu XJ, Wang C (2015) Design of a novel 3-DoF parallel kinematic mechanism: type synthesis and kinematic optimization. Robotica 33(3):622–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rao ABK, Rao PVM, Saha SK (2005) Dimensional design of hexaslides for optimal workspace and dexterity. IEEE Trans Rob 21(3):444–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sun T, Song YM, Dong G et al (2012) Optimal design of a parallel mechanism with three rotational degrees of freedom. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 28(4):500–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Qi Y, Sun T, Song YM (2018) Multi-objective optimization of parallel tracking mechanism considering parameter uncertainty. J Mech Robot 10(4):041006 (12 pages)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sun T, Lian BB, Song YM et al (2019) Elasto-dynamic optimization of a 5-DoF parallel kinematic machine considering parameter uncertainty. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 24(1):315–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miller K (2004) Optimal design and modeling of spatial parallel manipulators. Int J Robot Res 23(2):127–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yun Y, Li YM (2011) Optimal design of a 3-PUPU parallel robot with compliant hinges for micromanipulation in a cubic workspace. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 27:977–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shin HP, Lee SC, Jeong JI et al (2013) Antagonistic stiffness optimization of redundantly actuated parallel manipulators in a predefined workspace. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 18(3):1161–1169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Song YM, Lian BB, Sun T et al (2014) A novel five-degree-of-freedom parallel manipulator and its kinematic optimization. J Mech Robot 6(4):041008-1–041008-9Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sun T, Wu H, Lian BB et al (2016) Stiffness modeling, analysis and evaluation of a 5 degree of freedom hybrid manipulator for friction stir welding. ARCHIVE Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng SciGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jin R, Chen W, Simpson TW (2001) Comparative studies of metamodeling techniques under multiple modeling criteria. Struct Multidiscipl Optim 23:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Baumgartner U, Magele C, Renhart W (2004) Pareto optimality and particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans Magn 40(2):1172–1175CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringTianjin UniversityTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations