Revisiting Conditional Cash Transfers: General Overview and Its Implementation in Turkey

  • Tekin AkdemirEmail author
  • Barış Alpaslan
  • Halis Kıral
Part of the Accounting, Finance, Sustainability, Governance & Fraud: Theory and Application book series (AFSGFTA)


We first provide a general overview of conditional cash transfers and then review in detail the available information on conditional cash transfers for education and conditional health benefits in Turkey. The program was primarily initiated to alleviate the effects of the Turkish 2000–2001 banking crisis on the poor. In addition, it was aimed at increasing the enrolment rate and duration of schooling for children living in a low-income family as well as ensuring that women during and after pregnancy, and children after birth benefit from basic healthcare and nutrition services. In fact, according to our study, Turkey has overall made significant progress in both health outcomes and access to education at all levels, and this observed improvement in education and health could be attributed to the implementation of conditional cash transfers. However, although the descriptive statistics suggest that there has been a gradual increase in the number of beneficiaries for both conditional cash transfers for education and conditional health benefits over a 16-year period (2003–2018), the total amount of resources allocated to conditional cash transfers in other social protection programs is still limited.


  1. Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanligi & UNICEF. (2014). Turkiye’de Sartli Nakit Transferi Programinin Iyilestirilmesine Yonelik Politika Belgesi. Ankara (in Turkish).Google Scholar
  2. Bastagli, F., Hagen-Zanker, J., Harman, L., Barca, V., Sturge, G., Schmidt, T., & Pellerano, L. (2016). Cash Transfers: What Does the Evidence Say? A Rigorous Review of Programme Impact and of the Role of Design and Implementation Features. London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
  3. Catubig, M. C., Villano, R., & Dollery, B. (2015). Payment Schemes in Conditional Cash Transfer Programs: The Case of 4Ps in the Davao Region, Philippines. Administrative Sciences, 5(4), 240–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cecchini, S., & Madariaga, A. (2011). Conditional Cash Transfer Programmes: The Recent Experience in Latin America and the Caribbean. Santiago, Chile: United Nations.Google Scholar
  5. Dama, N., & Sundaram, D. T. (2018). Yoksulluk Dongusunden Cikis: Sartli Egitim Yardimi. Istanbul: SETA (in Turkish).Google Scholar
  6. Esenyel, C. (2009, Haziran). Turkiye’de ve Dunya’da Sartli Nakit Transferi Uygulamalari. Ankara: T.C Basbakanlik Sosyal Yardimlasma ve Dayanisma Genel Mudurlugu (in Turkish).Google Scholar
  7. Fiszbein, A., Schady, N., Ferreira, F. H., Grosh, M., Keleher, N., Olinto, P., & Skoufias, E. (2009). Conditional Cash Transfers: Reducing Present and Future Poverty. Washington DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Handa, S., & Davis, B. (2006). The Experience of Conditional Cash Transfers in Latin America and the Caribbean. Development Policy Review, 24(5), 513–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lettenhove, M. K. (2012). Conditional Cash Transfers in Latin America. Reflets et perspectives de la vie économique, 51(2), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Medellín, N., & Tejerina, L. (2017). Benefit Structure, the Payment Process, and Financial Inclusion. In P. Ibarrarán, N. Medellín, F. Regalia, & M. Stampini, How Conditional Cash Transfers Work: Good Practices after 20 Years of Implementation (pp. 52–74). Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
  11. Medgyesi, M., & Temesváry, Z. (2013, August). Conditional Cash Transfers in High-Income OECD Countries and Their Effects on Human Capital Accumulation. AIAS GINI Discussion Paper No.84.Google Scholar
  12. Pacassi, S. E., & Maurer, S. (2015, May 14). Practical Project in Development Cooperation. Conditional Cash Transfers (CCT): Potential for Development Cooperation? The Case of Bolivia. University of St. Gallen.Google Scholar
  13. Pantelić, A. (2011). A Comparative Analysis of Microfinance and Conditional Cash Transfers in Latin America. Development in Practice, 21(6), 790–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Parker, S. W., & Tom Vogl. (2018, February). Do Conditional Cash Transfers Improve Economic Outcomes in the Next Generation? Evidence from Mexico. Cambridge, MA: NBER Working Paper No.24303.Google Scholar
  15. Parodi, S., & Vásquez, M. (2017). Foundations of the Operational Cycle. In P. Ibarrarán, N. Medellín, F. Regalia, & M. Stampini, How Conditional Cash Transfers Work: Good Practices after 20 Years of Implementation (pp. 77–97). Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
  16. Rawlings, L. B., & Rubio, G. M. (2005). Evaluating the Impact of Conditional Cash Transfer Programs. The World Bank Research Observer, 20(1), 29–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Saglam, A. (2016, Temmuz). Yoksullukla Mucadelede Sosyal Politika Araci Olarak Sartli Nakit Transferi (SNT) ve Brezilya Ornegi. Ankara: T.C. Maliye Bakanligi Butce ve Mali Kontrol Genel Mudurlugu (in Turkish).Google Scholar
  18. Silva, M. M. (2017). Poverty Reduction, Education, and the Global Diffusion of Conditional Cash Transfers. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Uchiyama, N. (2019). Do Conditional Cash Transfers Reduce Household Vulnerability? Evidence from PROGRESA-Oportunidades in the 2000s. Economia, 1–19 (in press).Google Scholar
  20. Uzun, C. B. (2012). Turkiye’deki Sartli Nakit Transferi Yardimlarinin Bolgesel Dagilimi. Sosyal Politika Calismalari, 7(28), 37–59.Google Scholar
  21. Yildirim, J., Ozdemir, S., & Sezgin, F. (2014). A Qualitative Evaluation of a Conditional Cash Transfer Program in Turkey: The Beneficiaries’ and Key Informants’ Perspectives. Journal of Social Service Research, 40(1), 62–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Social Sciences University of AnkaraAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations