Advertisement

Integrating Lifecycle Thinking in Asset Management Through BIM: Opportunities for the Water Sector

  • Emiliya SuprunEmail author
  • Rodney A. StewartEmail author
  • Sherif Mostafa
  • Oz Sahin
  • Edoardo Bertone
Conference paper
  • 69 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

The water industry worldwide has been gradually transitioning towards digital asset management practices. Australia is no exception. However, these practices are often complicated by a lack of consistent models for gathering and maintaining up-to-date asset information across the industry. There is a need for innovative digital platforms and asset management solutions for making decisions that suit the increasing needs of the water sector. Building Information Modelling (BIM) can potentially be the conduit to asset management databases as it goes well beyond 3D models developed for use in the design and construction phase. The overarching goal of this research was to address the water industry challenge of implementing BIM to integrate digital data for the facility lifecycle as well as to provide information and decision support to asset management, and operation and maintenance. A number of workshops with asset managers and maintenance operators were held on the basis of a case study of a bulk water supply company in Australia. Stakeholders discussed specific expectations for the visualisation of information to ensure that data is used, understood and managed over the whole lifecycle. The barriers to the implementation of digital techniques for the purpose of efficient asset management were also explored.

Keywords

Asset information model Asset management BIM Lifecycle thinking Water industry 

References

  1. ABAB (2018) Asset information requirements guide: information required for the operation and maintenance of an asset. Australasian BIM Advisory Board, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  2. ABS (2017) Australian Bureau of Statistics 4610.0—water account, 2015–16. Australian Government, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  3. Akcamete A, Akinci B, Garrett JH Jr (2010) Potential utilization of building information models for planning maintenance activities. In: Proceedings of the international conference in computing in civil and building engineering, Nottingham, UKGoogle Scholar
  4. Araszkiewicz K (2017) Digital technologies in facility management—the state of practice and research challenges. Procedia Eng 196:1034–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becerik-Gerber B, Jazizadeh F, Li N, Calis G (2012) Application areas and data requirements for BIM-enabled facilities management. J Constr Eng Manage 138(3):431–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dawood N, Vukovic V (2015) Whole lifecycle information flow underpinned by BIM: technology, process, policy, and people. In: Proceedings of the ICCBEI 2015 2nd international conference on civil and building engineering informatics, Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  7. DSDMIP (2018) Digital enablement for Queensland infrastructure: principles for BIM implementation. The Department of State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  8. Hafeez MA, Chahrour R, Vukovic V, Dawood N, Kassem M (2015) Investigating the potential of delivering employer information requirements in BIM enabled construction projects in Qatar. In: Proceedings of the international conference in product lifecycle management, Doha, QatarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hosseini MR, Roelvink R, Papadonikolaki E, Edwards DJ, Pärn E (2018) Integrating BIM into facility management: typology matrix of information handover requirements. Int J Build Pathol Adapt 36(1):2–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ISO (2014) Asset management. Overview, principles and terminologyGoogle Scholar
  11. ISO (2018a) Organization of information about construction works—information management using building information modelling. Part 1: Concepts and principlesGoogle Scholar
  12. ISO (2018b) Organization of information about construction works—information management using building information modelling. Part 2: Delivery phase of the assetsGoogle Scholar
  13. Love PED, Matthews J, Simpson I, Hill A, Olatunji OA (2014) A benefits realization management building information modeling framework for asset owners. Autom Constr 37:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wong JKW, Ge J, He SX (2018) Digitisation in facilities management: a literature review and future research directions. Autom Constr 92:312–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Yin SJ, Sun XF, Tian, LN, Sun MQ, Li X, Shang YY, Zhang M (2014) The applications of BIM in the building water supply and drainage engineering design. Adva Mat Res 1014:271-275Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Engineering and Built EnvironmentGriffith UniversitySouthportAustralia

Personalised recommendations