Advertisement

Comparative Analysis of Methodologies for Calculating the Economic Life of Construction Equipment

  • Ilias Ladopoulos
  • Kleopatra PetroutsatouEmail author
  • Serafeim Polyzos
Conference paper
  • 71 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

The most profitable period of owning and operating a machine is during its economic life. To find the “sweet spot”, i.e. the time in the life cycle of the machine where owning and operating costs reach the minimum point, is a complicated task. It is evident that, in order to conclude with the best decision of either to keep or replace piece of equipment, repair-related cost information is indispensable, as it reflects machine’s DNA. Construction companies are currently facing an imbalance between the huge amount of owning and operating and maintenance (O&M) data that they have and the lack of solid organizational structures in order to make the best use of this knowledge. Thus, there is a dynamic that remains unused. This research highlights the advantages and disadvantages of methodologies for calculating the economic life of construction equipment and proposes a conceptual model that determines the replacement period using owning and O&M costs.

Keywords

Construction equipment Economic life Optimization methods Replacement Residual value 

References

  1. Edwards DJ, Harris F, McCaffer R (2003) Management of off highway plant and equipment, 3rd edn. Spon Press, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Edwards DJ, Yang J, Cabahug R, Love PED (2005) Intelligence and maintenance proficiency: an examination of plant operators. Constr Innov 5(4):243–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fan H, Jin Z (2011) A study of the factors affecting the economical life of heavy construction equipment. In: 28th international symposium on automation and robotics in construction (ISARC), Seoul, Korea, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  4. Gillespie J, Hyde A (2004) The replace/repair decision for heavy equipment. Final report, Virginia Department of Transportation, University of VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  5. Gransberg D (2015) Major equipment life-cycle cost analysis. Final report, Minnesota Department of Transportation: Research Services & LibraryGoogle Scholar
  6. Naskoudakis I, Petroutsatou K (2016) A thematic review of main researches on construction equipment over the recent years. Procedia Eng 164:206–213Google Scholar
  7. Nunnally SW (2006) Construction methods and management, 7th edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  8. Peurifoy R, Schexnayder C, Shapira A, Schmitt R (2011) Construction planning, equipment and methods. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Vorster M (2009) Construction equipment economics. Pen Publications, BlacksburgGoogle Scholar
  10. Xirokostas D (1999) Operational research. Replacement, maintenance, reliability. Symmetria, AthensGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ilias Ladopoulos
    • 1
  • Kleopatra Petroutsatou
    • 1
    Email author
  • Serafeim Polyzos
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.Department of Planning and Regional DevelopmentUniversity of ThessalyVolosGreece

Personalised recommendations