Advertisement

Mobile Device Transmission Security Policy Decision Making Using PROMETHEE

  • Sambhrant SamantrajEmail author
  • Satwik Dash
  • Prasant Kumar Patnaik
Conference paper
  • 11 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1101)

Abstract

This paper focuses on the brand of mobile devices having the better quality transmission security policy available in the market as per the need of the customers. However, the criteria for each brand of the mobile device have its own functions. So, to choose the reasonable one among accessible options is a challenge and leads to decision-making issues. These issues might be tended to by multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach. PROMETHEE is one of the decision-making processes that encourage clients to choose the appropriate option depending on their own observation and the criteria they take into consideration. The experiment has been performed based on the feedback provided and the outcome is recorded.

Keywords

Multiple-criteria decision making (MCDM) PROMETHEE Mobile transmission 

References

  1. 1.
    Smartphone Security Threats and Trends. http://www.fishnetsecurity.com/News-Release/Smartphone-Attacks-and-Hacking-Security-Threats-and-Trends-2011, Description: a webpage to introduce recent security threats trends in 2011.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Hajebrahimi, Mehdi. 2014. Evaluation of financial efficiencies of cement companies accepted In Tehran Stock Exchange by multi–criterion decision methods.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    Hwang, Junseok, and Irfan Syamsuddin. 2009. Information security policy decision making. Republic of Korea, B. C.: Seoul National University.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Saaty, Thomas L. 1996. Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    İnce, M., T. Yiğit, and A.H Işık. Multi criteria decision making system for learning object repositoryGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Roy, S., and P.K. Pattnaik. 2013. Some popular usability evaluation techniques for websites. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Al-Azab, F.G.M., and M.A. Ayu. 2010. Web based multi-criteria decision making using AHP method. In International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for the Muslim World.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brans, J.P. 1982. L’ingénierie de la décision; Elaboration d’instruments d’aide à la décision. La méthode PROMETHEE. In L’aide à la décision: Nature, Instruments et Perspectives d’Avenir, ed. R. Nadeau and M. Landry, 183–213. Québec, Canada: Presses de l’Université Laval.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Davignon, G., and B. Mareschal. 1989. Specialization of hospital services in Quebec—An application of the PROMETHEE and GAIA methods. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 12 (10–11): 1393–1400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Anderson, R. 2001. Why information security is hard: An economic perspective. In Proceedings of 17th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, 10–14.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kolli, S., and H.R. Parsaei. 1992. Multicriteria analysis in the evaluation of advanced manufacturing technology using PROMETHEE. Computers & Industrial Engineering 23 (1–4): 455–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sambhrant Samantraj
    • 1
    Email author
  • Satwik Dash
    • 1
  • Prasant Kumar Patnaik
    • 1
  1. 1.Kalinga Institute of Industrial TechnologyBhubaneswarIndia

Personalised recommendations