Advertisement

\(L_1\) Adaptive Control of a Lower Limb Exoskeleton Dedicated to Kids’ Rehabilitation

  • Boutheina MaalejEmail author
  • Ahmed Chemori
  • Nabil Derbel
Chapter
  • 12 Downloads
Part of the Studies in Systems, Decision and Control book series (SSDC, volume 270)

Abstract

In this chapter, four adaptive controllers have been proposed to control a 2-DOF exoskeleton dedicated to kids’ rehabilitation. These control laws are implemented at the hip and the knee joints. In fact, tracking the gait scheme with an intense and a precise work may allow children to increase their brain plasticity. Through the proposed study, it is shown that the augmented \(L_1\) adaptive controller is robust regards to parametric variations. Besides, to validate this controller, different scenarios and simulations were carried out to prove its effectiveness.

Keywords

Rehabilitation Cerebral palsy Exoskeletons Classical adaptive control \(L_1\) adaptive controller 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The present work is supported by (i) the “Association de Sauvegarde des Handicapés Moteurs - Sfax” (ASHMS), the (ii) Clinical Inverstigation Center (CIC) of the Hospitalo−University Center of Sfax (CHU) Tunisia, (iii) the Laboratory “Control & Energy Managements” (CEMLab) of the “National School of Engineering of Sfax”, University of Sfax, Tunisia, and (iv) the Digital Research Center of Sfax, Tunisia (CRNS).

References

  1. 1.
    Adams, E.: Power-multiplying exoskeletons are slimming down for use on the battlefield (2017). https://www.popsci.com/army-exoskeletons-lockheed-martin [online]
  2. 2.
    Duschau-Wicke, A., Brunsch, T., Lünenburger, L., Riener, R.: Adaptive support for patient-cooperative gait rehabilitation with the lokomat. In: IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 2357–2361 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zeilig, G., Weingarden, H., Obuchov, A., Bloch, A., Gaides, M., Reuveny, R., Ben-Dov, I.: Lokomat walking results in increased metabolic markers in individuals with high spinal cord injury. In: International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation, ICVR, pp. 119–120 (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Refai, H., Mohammed, S., Daachi, B., Amirat, Y.: Adaptive control of a human-driven knee joint orthosis. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 247.86–2491 (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Slotine, J.-J.E., Li, W.: On the adaptive control of robot manipulators. Int. J. Robot. Res., 49–59 (1987)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hovakimyan, N., Cao, C.: L1 adaptive control theory guaranted robustness with fast adaptation. Adv. Des. Control (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Refai, H., Ben Abdessalem, M.S., Chemori, A., Mohammed, S., Amirat, Y.: Augmented L1 adaptive control of an actuated knee joint exoskeleton: from design to real-time experiments. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA, pp. 5707.8–5714 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deep, A., Jaswal, R.:Role of management and virtual space for the rehabilitation of children affected with cerebral palsy: a review. In: IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Computing and Control, pp. 293–299 (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tucker, M., Olivier, J., Pagel, A., Bleuler, H., Bouri, M., Lambercy, O., Millán, J., Riener, R., Vallery, H., Gassert, R.: Control strategies for active lower extremity prosthetics and orthotics: a review. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., 1–12 (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ghezal, M., Guiatni, M., Boussioud, I., Renane, C.S.: Design and robust control of a 2 DOFs lower limb exoskeleton. In: International Conference on Communications and Electrical Engineering (2018)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bennehar, M., Chemori, A., Pierrot, F.: L1 adaptive control of parallel kinematic manipulators: design and real-time experiments. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 157.87–1592 (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hesse, S., Schmidt, H., Werner, C., Bardeleben, A.: Upper and lower extremity robotic devices for rehabilitation and for studying motor control. Curr. Opin. Neurol., 705–710 (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jamshidi, N., Rostami, M., Najarian, S., Menhaj, M.B., Saadatnia, M., Firooz, S.: Modelling of human walking to optimise the function of ankle-foot orthosis in Guillan-Barré patients with drop foot. Singap. Med. J. 50(4), 412–737 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rupal, B., Rafique, S., Singla, A., Singla, E., Isaksson, M., Virk, G.: Lower-limb exoskeletons: research trends and regulatory guidelines in medical and non-medical applications. Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst., 1–27 (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Boutheina Maalej
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Ahmed Chemori
    • 3
  • Nabil Derbel
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Control & Energy Management, ENISDigital Research Center of Sfax, University of SfaxSfaxTunisia
  2. 2.Clinical Investigation Center, University of GabesSfaxTunisia
  3. 3.LIRMMUniversity of Montpellier, CNRSMontpellierFrance

Personalised recommendations