A Fast Offline Database Construction Mechanism for Wi-Fi Fingerprint Based Localization Using Ultra-Wideband Technology

  • Huilin Jie
  • Hao Zhang
  • Kai LiuEmail author
  • Feiyu Jin
  • Chao Chen
  • Chaocan Xiang
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1101)


With the ever-increasing demand on location-based services (LBS), fingerprint-based methods have attracted more and more attention in indoor localization. However, the considerable overhead of fingerprint is still a problem which hinders the practicability of such technology. Due to the prevalent of Wi-Fi access points (APs) and the high location accuracy of Ultra-Wideband (UWB), in this paper, we propose a hybrid system which utilizes UWB and Wi-Fi technologies to alleviate the offline overhead and improve the localization accuracy. Specifically, we employ UWB to determine the coordinate of each reference point (RP) instead of traditional manual measurement. Meanwhile, the Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) of Wi-Fi is collected by a customized software installed in the mobile device. Then, a timestamp matching scheme is proposed to fuse these data coming from different devices and construct the offline fingerprint database. Besides, in order to better map the online data with offline database, an AP weight assignment scheme is proposed, which allocates APs with different weights based on the RSSI characteristic in each RP. We implement the system in real-world environment and the experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.


Indoor localization Wi-Fi fingerprint UWB technology 



This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61872049; the Frontier Interdisciplinary Research Funds for the Central Universities (Project No. 2018CDQYJSJ0034); and the Venture & Innovation Support Program for Chongqing Overseas Returnees (Project No. cx2018016).


  1. 1.
    Shu, Y., Bo, C., Shen, G., Zhao, C., Li, L., Zhao, F.: Magicol: indoor localization using pervasive magnetic field and opportunistic WiFi sensing. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 33(7), 1443–1457 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhuang, Y., Yang, J., Li, Y., Qi, L., El-Sheimy, N.: Smartphone-based indoor localization with bluetooth low energy beacons. IEEE Sens. 16(5), 596 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fang, Y., Cho, Y.K., Zhang, S., Perez, E.: Case study of BIM and cloud-enabled real-time RFID indoor localization for construction management applications. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 142(7), 05016003 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang, K., Nirmalathas, A., Lim, C., Alameh, K., Li, H., Skafidas, E.: Indoor infrared optical wireless localization system with background light power estimation capability. Opt. Express 25(19), 22923–22931 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yayan, U., Yucel, H.: A low cost ultrasonic based positioning system for the indoor navigation of mobile robots. J. Intell. Rob. Syst. 78(3–4), 541–552 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coluccia, A., Fascista, A.: On the hybrid TOA/RSS range estimation in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 17(1), 361–371 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yang, C., Shao, H.-R.: WiFi-based indoor positioning. IEEE Commun. Mag. 53(3), 150–157 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yang, Z., Wu, C., Liu, Y.: Locating in fingerprint space: wireless indoor localization with little human intervention. In: Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pp. 269–280. ACM, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jun, J., et al.: Low-overhead wifi fingerprinting. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 17(3), 590–603 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shu, Y., et al.: Gradient-based fingerprinting for indoor localization and tracking. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 63(4), 2424–2433 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Elbakly, R., Youssef, M.: A robust zero-calibration RF-based localization system for realistic environments. In: 2016 13th Annual IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication, and Networking (SECON), pp. 1–9. IEEE, London (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Machaj, J., Brida, P., Piché, R.: Rank based fingerprinting algorithm for indoor positioning. In: 2011 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation, pp. 1–6. IEEE, Guimaraes (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Han S., Zhao C., Meng W., Li, C.: Cosine similarity based fingerprinting algorithm in WLAN indoor positioning against device diversity. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp. 2710–2714. IEEE, London (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Silva, B., Pang, Z., Akerberg, J., Neander, J., Hancke, G.: Experimental study of UWB-based high precision localization for industrial applications. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Ultra-WideBand (ICUWB), pp. 280–285. IEEE, Paris (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Martin, E., Vinyals, O., Friedland, G., Bajcsy, R.: Precise indoor localization using smart phones. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 787–790. ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chai, E., Shin, K.G.: Low-overhead control channels in wireless networks. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 14(11), 2303–2315 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Toth, C.K., Jozkow, G., Koppanyi, Z., Grejner-Brzezinska, D.: Positioning slow-moving platforms by UWB technology in GPS-challenged areas. J. Surv. Eng. 143(4), 04017011 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shi, G., Ming, Y.: Survey of indoor positioning systems based on ultra-wideband (UWB) technology. In: Zeng, Q.-A. (ed.) Wireless Communications, Networking and Applications. LNEE, vol. 348, pp. 1269–1278. Springer, New Delhi (2016). Scholar
  19. 19.
    Alarifi, A., et al.: Ultra wideband indoor positioning technologies: analysis and recent advances. Sensors 16(5), 707 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang, H., Liu, K., Jin, F., Feng, L., Lee, V., Ng, J.: A scalable indoor localization algorithm based on distance fitting and fingerprint mapping in Wi-Fi environments. Neural Comput. Appl. 2019, 1–15 (2019)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhang, H., et al.: An Annulus Local Search Based Localization (ALSL) algorithm in indoor Wi-Fi environments. In: 2018 IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Advanced, pp. 887–892. IEEE, Guangzhou (2018)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu, K., et al.: Toward low-overhead fingerprint-based indoor localization via transfer learning: design, implementation, and evaluation. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 14(3), 898–908 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jin, F., Liu, K., Zhang, H., Wu, W., Cao, J., Zhai, X.: A zero site-survey overhead indoor tracking system using particle filter. In: ICC 2019–2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp. 1–7. IEEE, Shanghai (2019)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Huilin Jie
    • 1
  • Hao Zhang
    • 1
  • Kai Liu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Feiyu Jin
    • 1
  • Chao Chen
    • 1
  • Chaocan Xiang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceChongqing UniversityChongqingChina

Personalised recommendations