Advertisement

The Use of Consumer Neuroscience Knowledge in Improving Real Promotional Media: The Case of Worten

  • José Paulo Marques dos SantosEmail author
  • Hugo Ferreira
  • Joaquim Reis
  • Diana Prata
  • Sofia Pereira Simões
  • Inês Drummond Borges
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 167)

Abstract

All those that work in markets research know, for long, that there is a distance between the intentions that consumers manifest overtly (e.g. in surveys or focus groups) and what they practise. One cause is that these methods assume the consumer as a full rational decision-maker, although most consumption acts arise in the non-conscious plan, where intuition and emotions play the most important roles. Traditional inquiry methods ground on the former while consumption decision processes live in the latter. The unfit is notorious. Consumer neuroscience aims to go beyond this hurdle by directly questioning the brain processes. We use in this study EEG, eye-tracking, EDA/SCR, and heart rate monitoring to measure differences in the redesign of the logo and communication materials of the largest appliance retailer in Portugal, Worten. The results allowed identifying and measuring ameliorations in consumers’ emotional engagement in the TV commercials and media layout. Commercials tend now more towards approach than withdrawal and the flow of the eyes while searching for information in printed materials is more placid and smoother. These improvements contribute to enhance marketing communication with consumers.

Keywords

Consumer neuroscience Neuromarketing Advertising Electroencephalography Eye-tracking 

References

  1. 1.
    Østergaard, P., Jantzen, C.: Shifting perspectives in consumer research: from buyer behaviour to consumption studies. In: Beckmann, S.C., Elliott, R.H. (eds.) Interpretive Consumer Research—Paradigms. Methodologies & Applications. Copenhagen Business School Press, Copenhagen (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Walla, P., Mavratzakis, A., Bosshard, S.: Neuroimaging for the affective brain sciences, and its role in advancing consumer neuroscience. In: Fountas, K. (ed.) Novel Frontiers of Advanced Neuroimaging. InTech (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chamberlain, L., Broderick, A.: The application of physiological observation methods to emotion research. Qual. Mark. Res.: Int. J. 10, 199–216 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750710740853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Havlena, W.J., Holbrook, M.B.: The varieties of consumption experience: comparing two typologies of emotion in consumer behavior. J. Consum. Res. 13, 394–404 (1986).  https://doi.org/10.1086/209078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mehrabian, A.: Framework for a comprehensive description and measurement of emotional states. Genet. Soc. Gen. Psychol. Monogr. 121, 339–361 (1995)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mehrabian, A., de Wetter, R.: Experimental test of an emotion-based approach to fitting brand names to products. J. Appl. Psychol. 72, 125–130 (1987).  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.72.1.125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vecchiato, G., Cherubino, P., Maglione, A.G., Ezquierro, M.T.H., Marinozzi, F., Bini, F., Trettel, A., Babiloni, F.: How to measure cerebral correlates of emotions in marketing relevant tasks. Cogn. Comput. 6, 856–871 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-014-9304-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ariely, D., Berns, G.: Neuromarketing: the hope and hype of neuroimaging in business. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 284–292 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smidts, A., Hsu, M., Sanfey, A.G., Boksem, M.A.S., Ebstein, R.B., Huettel, S.A., Kable, J.W., Karmarkar, U.R., Kitayama, S., Knutson, B., Liberzon, I., Lohrenz, T., Stallen, M., Yoon, C.: Advancing consumer neuroscience. Mark. Lett. 25, 257–267 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-014-9306-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Plassmann, H., Venkatraman, V., Huettel, S., Yoon, C.: Consumer neuroscience: applications, challenges, and possible solutions. J. Mark. Res. 52, 427–435 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.14.0048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Davidson, R.J., Ekman, P., Saron, C.D., Senulis, J.A., Friesen, W.V.: Approach-withdrawal and cerebral asymmetry: emotional expression and brain physiology: I. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 58, 330–341 (1990).  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.2.330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Davidson, R.J.: Anterior cerebral asymmetry and the nature of emotion. Brain Cogn. 20, 125–151 (1992).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2626(92)90065-TCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Silberstein, R.B., Nield, G.E.: Measuring emotion in advertising research: prefrontal brain activity. IEEE Pulse 3, 24–27 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1109/MPUL.2012.2189172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ohme, R., Reykowska, D., Wiener, D., Choromanska, A.: Application of frontal EEG asymmetry to advertising research. J. Econ. Psychol. 31, 785–793 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2010.03.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lin, M.-H., Cross, S.N.N., Jones, W.J., Childers, T.L.: Applying EEG in consumer neuroscience. Eur. J. Mark. 52, 66–91 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-12-2016-0805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Telpaz, A., Webb, R., Levy, D.J.: Using EEG to predict consumers’ future choices. J. Mark. Res. 52, 511–529 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.13.0564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pieters, R., Wedel, M., Batra, R.: The stopping power of advertising: measures and effects of visual complexity. J. Mark. 74, 48–60 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.74.5.48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hutton, S.B., Nolte, S.: The effect of gaze cues on attention to print advertisements. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 25, 887–892 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ares, G., Giménez, A., Bruzzone, F., Vidal, L., Antúnez, L., Maiche, A.: Consumer visual processing of food labels: results from an eye-tracking study. J. Sens. Stud. 28, 138–153 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1111/joss.12031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hurley, R.A., Ouzts, A., Fischer, J., Gomes, T.: Effects of private and public label packaging on consumer purchase patterns. Packag. Technol. Sci. 26, 399–412 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bechara, A., Damásio, H., Tranel, D., Damásio, A.R.: Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science 275, 1293–1295 (1997).  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5304.1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jurcak, V., Tsuzuki, D., Dan, I.: 10/20, 10/10, and 10/5 systems revisited: Their validity as relative head-surface-based positioning systems. NeuroImage 34, 1600–1611 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vecchiato, G., Cherubino, P., Trettel, A., Babiloni, F.: Neuroelectrical Brain Imaging Tools for the Study of the Efficacy of TV Advertising Stimuli and their Application to Neuromarketing. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Welch, P.D.: The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: a method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms. IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust. 15, 70–73 (1967).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TAU.1967.1161901CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • José Paulo Marques dos Santos
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Hugo Ferreira
    • 3
    • 4
  • Joaquim Reis
    • 4
  • Diana Prata
    • 4
  • Sofia Pereira Simões
    • 5
  • Inês Drummond Borges
    • 5
  1. 1.University Institute of MaiaMaiaPortugal
  2. 2.Faculty of MedicineUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal
  3. 3.Faculty of SciencesUniversity of LisbonLisbonPortugal
  4. 4.IBEB—Institute of Biophysics and Biomedical EngineeringLisbonPortugal
  5. 5.Worten, Direcção de MarketingCarnaxidePortugal

Personalised recommendations