Advertisement

Closing Access Loop: Situating Post-infrastructural Assurance Circumstances in Rural Sanitation

  • Kopal KhareEmail author
  • Sunny Jose
Chapter
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

Ill-health outcomes and squalor living conditions are inextricably linked with decommissioned water and sanitation considerations. The recent developments in the country bear witness to the fact that the increased awareness and priority has garnered inquiry, multiple interventions, and policy responses into the wider aspects of the sector. The key findings of recently held National Annual Rural Sanitation Survey 2017–2018, claim an almost full coverage of toilets as well as usage of the same. Inequality concerns in deriving benefits from interventions may not figure early in the availability of infrastructural arrangements, given the firm focus on the sector, but there are inequitable experiences which emerge post water and sanitation infrastructural assurance posing challenges for people in rural areas. From the benefit of hindsight, it could be inferred that water and sanitation centric interventions often suffer from a condition called ‘slippage’—an eventuality which besets water and sanitation arrangements over a period of time while engendering people go back to previous unhygienic preferences. In this literature-based paper, we explore the plausible reasons behind the occurrence and draw interpretations grounded in Amartya Sen’s view of justice which looks at an activity as ‘procedural fairness,’ i.e. what people are able to do and be with a given amount of resources. The analysis would then be followed by the review of empirical studies and sustainable sanitation practices of nations which have achieved open defecation free status, and learning outcomes that how they have managed to sustain it over a period of time.

Keywords

Rural sanitation Slippage Access Safely managed sanitation Equity 

References

  1. Anand, S. (2002). The concern for equity in health. In: S. Anand, F. Peter, & A. Sen (Eds.), Public health, ethics, and equity (pp. 28–31).Google Scholar
  2. Alok, K. (2010). Squatting with dignity: Lessons from India. India: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnold, B. F., Khush, R. S., Ramaswamy, P., London, A. G., Rajkumar, P., Ramaprabha, P., … Colford, J. M. (2017). Causal inference methods to study nonrandomized, preexisting development interventions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 201008944.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.
  4. Balasubramanya, S., Evans, B., Ahmed, R., Habib, A., Asad, N. S. M., Rahman, M., …, Fernando, S. (2017). Take it away: The need for designing fecal sludge disposal services for single-pit latrines. Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development, 7(1), 121–128.  https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2017.073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balasubramanya, S., Evans, B., Ahmed, R., Habib, A., Asad, N. S. M., Vuong, L., …, Camargo-Valero, M. (2016). Pump it up: making single-pit emptying safer in rural Bangladesh. Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development, 6(3), 456–464.  https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2016.049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bourne, P. G. (1984). Water and sanitation for all. In P. G. Bourne (Ed.), Water and sanitation: Economic and sociological perspectives (pp. 16–18). USA: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
  7. Cairncross, S. (2003). Sanitation in the developing world: Current status and future solutions. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 13(Suppl. 1), 37–41.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0960312031000102886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coffey, D., & Spears, D. (2017). Where India goes: Abandoned toilets, stunted development and the costs of caste. Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Coffey, D., et al. (2017). Understanding open defecation in rural India untouchability, pollution, and latrine pits. Economic & Political Weekly, lII(1), 59–62.Google Scholar
  10. Daniels, N., et al. (2005). Health and inequality, or, why justice is good for our health. In: S. Anand, F. Peter, & A. Sen (Eds.), Public health, ethics, and equity (pp. 28–31).Google Scholar
  11. Joshi, Y. (2018). The real status of rural sanitation. Economic & Political Weekly, LIII(28), 100–101.Google Scholar
  12. Ekane, N., Nykvist, B., Kjellén, M., Noel, S., & Weitz, N. (2014). Multi-level sanitation governance: Understanding and overcoming challenges in the sanitation sector in sub-Saharan Africa. Stockholm Environment Institute, 4(3), 1–18.  https://doi.org/10.3362/2046-1887.2014.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Engel, S., & Susilo, A. (2014). Shaming and sanitation in Indonesia: A return to colonial public health practices? Development and Change, 45(1), 157–178.  https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Galvin, M. (2015). Talking shit: Is Community-Led Total Sanitation a radical and revolutionary approach to sanitation? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 2(1), 9–20.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Geruso, M., & Spears, D. (2014). Sanitation and health externalities: Resolving the Muslim mortality paradox. In Population Association of America 2014 Annual Meeting Program, July.Google Scholar
  16. Gimelli, F. M., Bos, J. J., & Rogers, B. C. (2018). Fostering equity and wellbeing through water: A reinterpretation of the goal of securing access. World Development, 104, 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.10.033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goff, M., & Crow, B. (2014). What is water equity? The unfortunate consequences of a global focus on ‘drinking water.’ Water International, 39(2), 159171.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2014.886355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hirai, T., & Ikemoto, Y. (2017). Sen’s economics in the idea of justice: Induction vs deduction. Review of Political Economy, 29(1), 93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hutchings, P., & Carter, R. C. (2018). Editorial: Setting SDG ambitions in a realistic time-scale. Waterlines, 38(1), 1–4.  https://doi.org/10.3362/1756-3488.2018.37-1ED.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF. (2017). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2015–16: India. Mumbai: IIPS.Google Scholar
  21. Mehta, L. (2014). Water and human development. World Development, 59, 59–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mehrotra, N., & Patnaik, S. M. (2008). Culture versus coercion: Other side of Nirmal Gram Yojana. Economic and Political Weekly, 43(43), 25–27.Google Scholar
  23. Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation. (2012). Sanitation and Hygiene Advocacy and Communication Strategy Framework 2012–2017. Government of India.Google Scholar
  24. Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation. (2014). Guidelines for Swachh Bharat Mission (Gramin). Government of India.Google Scholar
  25. Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation. (2017). National Policy on Faecal Sludge and Septage Management. Government of India.Google Scholar
  26. Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation. (2018). National Annual Rural Sanitation Survey 2017–2018. Government of India.Google Scholar
  27. Mohan, R. V. (2017). Swachh Bharat Mission (Gramin) bottlenecks and remedies. Economic and political weekly, LII (No 20), 15–17.Google Scholar
  28. Mosler, H. J., Mosch, S., & Harter, M. (2018). Is Community-Led Total Sanitation connected to the rebuilding of latrines? Quantitative evidence from Mozambique. PLoS ONE, 13(5), 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Narayanan, R., van Norden, H., Gosling, L., & Patkar, A. (2012). Equity and inclusion in sanitation and hygiene in South Asia: A regional synthesis. IDS Bulletin, 43(2), 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. O’Reilly, K., Dhanju, R., & Louis, E. (2017). Subjected to sanitation: Caste relations and sanitation adoption in Rural Tamil Nadu. Journal of Development Studies, 53(11), 1915–1928.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2016.1241385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Odagiri, M., Muhammad, Z., Cronin, A. A., Gnilo, M. E., Mardikanto, A. K., Umam, K., et al. (2017). Enabling factors for sustaining open defecation-free communities in rural Indonesia: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(12), 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pickford, J. (1980). UN water and sanitation decade. Habitat International, 5(3–4), 459–467.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-3975(80)90032-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rashid, M., & Pandit, D. (2018). Analysis of service quality of household toilets expected by households practicing open defecation: A study in rural settlements of Bihar, India. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0145-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ratna Reddy, V. R., Rammohan Rao, M. S., & Venkataswamy, M. (2011). ‘Slippage’: The bane of rural drinking water sector (a study of extent and causes in Andhra Pradesh). Journal of Social and Economic Development, 13(2), 163–188.Google Scholar
  35. Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Rosenqvist, T., Mitchell, C., & Willetts, J. (2016). A short history of how we think and talk about sanitation services and why it matters. Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development, 6(2), 298–312.  https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2016.118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ruger, J. P. (2009). Health and social justice. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 387–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schmidt, W.-P. (2014). The elusive effect of water and sanitation on the global burden of disease. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 19(5), 522–527.  https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.12286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sen, A. K. (2001). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Sen, A. (2005). Why health inequity. In S. Anand, F. Peter, & A. Sen (Eds.), Public health, ethics, and equity (pp. 28–31).Google Scholar
  42. Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Cambridge: The Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Snehalatha, M., Anitha Raj, V., Busenna, P., & Venkataswamy, M. (2014). Nirmal Gram Puraskar and sanitation service levels: The curse of slippage. Sustainable Water and Sanitation Services: The Life-Cycle Cost Approach to Planning and Management, 126, 136–157.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203521670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sohail, M., Cavill, S., & Afolabi, O. O. D. (2018). Transformative technologies for safely managed sanitation. Institution of Civil Engineering, 171, 78–85.  https://doi.org/10.1680/jmuen.16.00026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sultana, F. (2018). Water justice: Why it matters and how to achieve it. Water International, 00(00), 1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2018.1458272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Uddin, S. M. N., Tempel, A., Adamowski, J. F., Lapegue, J., Li, Z., & Mang, H. P. (2016). Exploring alternative sources of funding for deploying sustainable sanitation technologies and services in Mongolia. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 32(6), 881–894.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2015.1121137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. UN Inter-agency Group. (2017). Levels and trends in child mortality. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund.Google Scholar
  48. Waddington, H., Snilstveit, B., White, H., & Fewtrell, L. (2009). Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to combat childhood diarrhoea in developing countries. New Delhi: International Initiative for Impact Evaluation.Google Scholar
  49. World Health Organization. (2017a). WASH in the 2030 agenda: New global indicators for drinking water, sanitation and hygiene (pp. 1–2). World Health Organization and the United Nations Children’s Fund Joint Monitoring Project.Google Scholar
  50. World Health Organization. (2017b). Progress on drinking water, sanitation and hygiene: 2017 update and SDG baselines (pp. 2–10). World Health Organization and the United Nations Children’s Fund Joint Monitoring Project, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  51. World Health Organisation and United Nation Children’s Fund. (2018). WASH data. Retrieved from https://washdata.org/. Accessed 30 Aug 2018.
  52. Yogananth, N., & Bhatnagar, T. (2018). Prevalence of open defecation among households with toilets and associated factors in rural south India: An analytical cross-sectional study. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 112(7), 349–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Humanities and Social SciencesBirla Institute of Technology & Science Pilani-Hyderabad CampusHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations