Advertisement

“The Side Door Is Open”: Identity Articulation and Cultural Practices in Post-Arab Spring Kuwait

  • Emanuela Buscemi
Chapter
  • 7 Downloads
Part of the Contemporary Gulf Studies book series (CGS)

Abstract

In 2011–2013 Kuwait experienced its own version of the Arab Spring. Motivated and inspired by the mobilizations in Tunisia and Egypt, tens of thousands of people rallied to protest against corruption, demanding accountability and the extension of citizenship rights. As a consequence of widespread sanctions and the criminalization of activists, engagement for social change has been transferred from the streets to civil society via cultural projects. Non-traditional political actors have, thus, moved their activism to informal venues and spaces of articulation of debate, keeping the political message of their actions, albeit adopting nonconfrontational techniques and methodologies. A creative delegitimization (Herrera and Bayat 2010) ensues, whereby dissent operates in the interstices between civil society and the state. This chapter investigates the political and social role of activists in contemporary Kuwait, and how the articulation of their engagement in civil society contests and challenges dominant cultural and political paradigms, allowing for new identity markers to be explored, navigating identities between social constructions and political negotiations. The analysis focuses on the cultural roots and manifestations of local activism through everyday cultural practices, carving new spaces of autonomy and expressions of identity, while allowing for new forms of social interaction to occur.

To examine the significance of these practices, together with their social and cultural reach, the current debate on democratization and civil society is addressed, analyzing both classical theories and postcolonial elaborations with reference to the Middle East. Loci for the articulation of political debate in Kuwait are investigated in relation to the main groups excluded from formal sites of power, whose actions and engagement open up the debate on identity, belonging and a renewed concept of citizenship. The emergence of groups, collectives, associations and platforms active in civil society is analyzed through the lens of their conscious choice to operate outside official channels of participation and refusing state sponsorship. Informality allows for flexibility and adaptability of these fluid civic structures, while avoiding government censorship. As government repression escalated in the aftermath of the local Arab Spring, with the detention of protestors, increased censorship and cracking down on freedom of expression, activists have turned to civil society and renewed forms of civic engagement or reactivated already existing ties. Quotidian cultural projects obliterate the exceptionality of the protests to relocate the political message into everyday life. The shift of political socialization and activism, and the extension of the political debate to more informal venues of participation, the aggregating role of social media and the elaboration of new projects of participation in society highlight a disaffection toward traditional politics and its expressions. The chapter, thus, situates Kuwaiti cultural and political activism within the broader theme of identity construction in the Arab Gulf and the Middle East.

Narratives from two ethnographic fieldworks based on interviews with social and political activists carried out in Kuwait in 2013 and between 2013 and 2016 ground the theoretical perspective while opening up interrogatives on national as well as political identity.

References

  1. Alhamad, L. (2008). Formal and Informal Venues of Engagement. In E. Lust-Okar & S. Zerhouni (Eds.), Political Participation in the Middle East (pp. 32–47). Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  2. al-Mughni, H. (2010). The Rise of Islamic Feminism in Kuwait. Revue des mondes musulmans et de la Méditerranée, 128(1), 167–182.Google Scholar
  3. Arts, P., & Cavatorta, F. (2013). Civil Society in Syria and Iran. In P. Arts & F. Cavatorta (Eds.), Civil Society in Syria and Iran: Activism in Authoritarian Contexts (pp. 1–17). Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  4. Baker, G. (2002). Civil Society and Democratic Theory. Alternative Voices. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bayat, A. (1997). Street Politics. Poor People Movements in Iran. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bayat, A. (2009). Life as Politics. How Ordinary People Change the Middle East. Cairo: The American University in Cairo Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bayat, A. (2017). Revolution Without Revolutionaries: Making Sense of the Arab Spring. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The Location of Culture. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Boyd, R. (2013). Adam Smith on Civility and Civil Society. In C. J. Berry, M. P. Paganelli, & C. Smith (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Adam Smith [online]. Retrieved from http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199605064.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199605064-e-22
  10. Browers, M. (2006). Democracy and Civil Society in Arab Political Thought: Transcultural Possibilities. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Brubaker, R. (2013). Categories of Analysis and Categories of Practice: A Note on the Study of Muslims in European Countries of Immigration. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 31(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buscemi, E. (2015). Silent Resistance and Creative Delegitimization. Kuwaiti Women’s Cultural Articulation of Dissent, Paper Presented at the Conference Sociology of Islam: Reflection, Revision and Reorientation, Ruhr University Bochum, 25–27 June.Google Scholar
  13. Buscemi, E. (2016). Abaya and Yoga Pants: Women’s Activism in Kuwait. AG About Gender-International Journal of Gender Studies, 5(10), 186–203.Google Scholar
  14. Buscemi, E. (2017). Resistant Identities: Culture and Politics Among Kuwaiti Youth. Contemporary Social Science-Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences, 12(3–4), 258–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buscemi, E. (2018). Reforming Narratives: Kuwaiti Women’s Cultural Engagement and Political Subjectivity in the Post-Arab Spring, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
  16. Buscemi, E. (2020). Reclaiming Spaces: Kuwaiti Women in the Karamat Watan Protests. In R. Stephan & M. Charrad (Eds.), Women Rising: Resistance, Revolution, and Reform in the Arab Spring and Beyond. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Calhoun, C. (1992). Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Castells, M. (1997). The Information Age. Economy, Society and Culture. Volume II: The Power of Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  19. Challand, B. (2011). The Counter-Power of Civil Society and the Emergence of a New Political Imaginary in the Arab World. Constellations, 18(3), 271–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cohen, J., & Arato, A. (1992). Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. de Toqueville, A. (2003). Democracy in America (trans: Bevan. G. E.). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  22. Duncombe, S. (2002). Cultural Resistance Reader. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  23. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
  24. Herrera, L., & Bayat, A. (2010). Being Young and Muslim. New Cultural Politics in the Global South and North. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hinnebusch, R. (2006). Authoritarian Persistence, Democratization Theory and the Middle East: An Overview and Critique. Democratization, 13(3), 373–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Human Rights Watch. (2015). World Report 2015. Retrieved from https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2015/country-chapters/kuwait
  27. International Center for Not-For-Profit Law, Kuwait. (2017). Philanthropy Law Report, Undated. Retrieved from http://www.icnl.org/Kuwait%20Philanthropy%20Law%20Report.pdf
  28. Interview with Ebtehal, Salmiya, Kuwait, 7 May 2015.Google Scholar
  29. Interview with Farah, Salmiya, Kuwait, 6 May 2013.Google Scholar
  30. Interview with Ghadah, Salwa, Kuwait, 23 February 2015.Google Scholar
  31. Interview with Hala, Salwa, Kuwait, 15 May 2013.Google Scholar
  32. Interview with Hussa, Qibla, Kuwait, 9 February 2015.Google Scholar
  33. Interview with Lameen, Salmiya, Kuwait, 20 April 2013.Google Scholar
  34. Interview with Lubna, Kuwait, 7 June 2016.Google Scholar
  35. Interview with Maryam Al Nusif, Salmiya, 5 May 2016.Google Scholar
  36. Interview with Nada, Salmiya, Kuwait, 19 February 2015.Google Scholar
  37. Interview with Reem, Salmiya, Kuwait, 22 March 2015.Google Scholar
  38. Interview with Sandra, Salmiya, Kuwait, 20 April 2015.Google Scholar
  39. Interview with Sarah Al Hamad, Salmiya, Kuwait, 28 January 2015.Google Scholar
  40. Interview with Sarah Alfraih, Khaldiya, Kuwait, 9 April 2015.Google Scholar
  41. Interview with Shurooq, Egaila, 8 April 2015.Google Scholar
  42. Interview with Zahra, Salmiya, Kuwait, 23 April 2013.Google Scholar
  43. Linz, J. (1986). Problems of Democratic Condition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Longva, A. N. (2005). Neither Autocracy nor Democracy but Ethnocracy: Citizens, Expatriates and the Socio-Political System in Kuwait. In P. Dresch & J. Piscatori (Eds.), Monarchies and Nations: Globalisation and Identity in the Arab States of the Gulf (pp. 114–135). London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  45. Mannheim, K. (1952). The Problem of Generations. In P. Kecskemeti (Ed.), Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge (pp. 276–320). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  46. Norton, A. R. (2006a). Associational Life: Civil Society in Authoritarian Political Systems. In M. Tessler (Ed.), Area Studies and Social Science. Strategies and for Understanding Middle Eastern Politics (pp. 30–47). Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Norton, A. R. (2006b). Foreword. In J. Feldt & P. Seeberg (Eds.), New Media in the Middle East (Working Paper Series, no. 7) (pp. 4–8). Odense: Centre for Contemporary Middle East Study, University of Southern Denmark.Google Scholar
  48. O’Donnell, G., Schmitter, P. C., & Whitehead, L. (Eds.). (1986). Transitions from Authoritarian Rule. Southern Europe, Volumes 1 to 4. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Personal Communication with S., Kuwait, 6 June 2016.Google Scholar
  50. Sajoo, A. B. (2002). Civil Society in the Muslim World: Contemporary Perspectives. London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  51. Smith, A. (1993). Wealth of Nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Smith, A. (2006). The Theory of Moral Sentiments. London: Dover Philosophical Classics.Google Scholar
  53. The University of Texas at Austin Liberal Arts. (n.d.). Civil Society: Kuwait. Retrieved from http://www.la.utexas.edu/users/chenry/civil/Dead%20Sea%202005/CivilSocietyAndMedia/CivilSociety/Kuwait_CountryProfiles.pdf
  54. Thijssen, P. (2012). From Mechanical to Organic Solidarity and Back: With Honneth Beyond Durkheim. European Journal of Social Theory, 15(4), 454–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Travaglino, G., & Abrams, B. (2017). Editorial. Creative Practices and Resistant Acts: Cultural Production and Emerging Democracies in Revolutionary Nations. Contention: The Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Protest, 5(2), IV–VI.Google Scholar
  56. Villa, D. R. (1992). Postmodernism and the Public Sphere. American Political Science Review, 86(3), 712–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wiktorowicz, Q. (2000). Civil Society as Social Control: State Power in Jordan. Comparative Politics, 33(1), 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emanuela Buscemi
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Monterrey (UDEM)MonterreyMexico

Personalised recommendations