Advertisement

Designing a BYOD Supported Formative Learning Interface and Analysis of Classroom Interaction

  • Suman DebEmail author
  • Nisha Saha
  • Paritosh Bhattacharya
Conference paper
  • 18 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1089)

Abstract

Increase in the use of portable and personalized devices like smartphone, tablet, etc., that has changed the way of traditional interaction in face-to-face communication. This work is to explore the popularity of these devices in an affirmative way to enhance the classroom interaction. In the present classroom, even with the use of multimedia demonstration of educational content, it is difficult to set up an interactive one-to-one relation between a teacher and students. With the affordable self-paced learning platforms students are already equipped with the content to be discussed in the classroom; thus, making it difficult to maintain the integrity and interest level of a classroom beyond a certain time. To maintain pace with the latest technology that pre-feeds and provided on-demand knowledge into the student population, we are proposing a BYOD-based platform to increase the interaction of students in classroom by a one-to-one interaction relation with teacher. This can be summarized as a computer-mediated predictive analysis of students interest that may allow the teacher to steer the classroom interest for catering to every students individual needs. As most of higher classes students move with their devices, we propose here a framework to utilize the advent of BYOD to increasing the formative learning and assessment of student interest to avert the boredom of monotonous learning in classroom.

Keywords

BYOD interaction Formative learning Predictive analysis of performance Classroom interaction 

References

  1. 1.
    American Psychological Association. How to Build a Better Educational System: Jigsaw Classrooms (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barry, B.E., Jonathan Bodenhamer, M.: Understanding Your Students Nonverbal Communication: A Primer for the New Engineering Educator. American Society for Engineering Education (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beatty, I.D., Leonard, W.J., Gerace, W.J., Dufresne, R.J.: Question driven instruction: teaching science (well) with an audience response system. In: Banks, D.A. (ed.) Audience Response Systems in Higher Education Applications and Cases, pp. 96–115. Idea Group Inc. (2006) (chapter 7)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beatty, I.D., Gerace, W.J.: Technology-enhanced formative assessment: a research-based pedagogy for teaching science with classroom response technology. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 18(2), 146–162 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carnegie Mellon University. What is the Difference Between Formative and Summative Assessment? (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Dohen, M., Schwartz, J.-L., Bailly, G.: Speech and face-to-face communication an introduction. Speech Commun. 52(6), 477–480 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Drummond, T.: A Brief Summary of the Best Practices in College Teaching (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dufresne, R.J., Gerace, W.J., Leonard, W.J., Mestre, J.P., Wenk, L.: Classtalk: a classroom communication system for active learning. J. Comput. High. Educ. 7(2), 347 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Elmes, J.: Six Significant Challenges for Technology in Higher Education (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Haggarty, L., Postlethwaite, K.: Strategies for improving communication between teachers and school students about learning: a university/school collaborative research project. Educ. Act. Res. 10(3), 449–478 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790200200195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hattie, J., Timperley, H.: The power of feedback. Rev. Educ. Res. 77(1), 81–112 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kelsey, S.: Premier reference source. Computer-Mediated Communication: Issues and Approaches in Education: Issues and Approaches in Education. Information Science Reference (2011). ISBN: 978-1-61350-078-1Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    McDaniels, N.: How technology in the classroom is destroying education. https://marquetteeducator.wordpress.com/2010/12/15/how-technology-in-the-classroom-is-destroying-education/ (2010)
  15. 15.
    Mishra, P., Koehler, M.J.: Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teach. Coll. Rec. 108(6), 1017–1054 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Radford, K.W.: Observing the class. Educ. Can. 30, 36–39 (1990)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Saa, P., Moscoso-Zea, O., Lujan-Mora, S.: Bring your own device (BYOD): students perception privacy issues: a new trend in education? (2017)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stanley, A., Erin Porter, M.: Engaging Large Classes: Strategies and Techniques for College Faculty. ISBN: 978-1-119-11124-5Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Summerlee, A.J.S.: Challenge of engagement inside and outside the classroom: the future for universities. http://www.portlandpress.com/pp/books/online/wg85/085/0067/0850067.pdf (2010)
  20. 20.
    Walther, J.B.: Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Comput. Hum. Behav. 23(5), 2538–2557 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computer Science and Engineering DepartmentNational Institute of Technology AgartalaJiraniaIndia

Personalised recommendations