Advertisement

Optimal Selection of Electric Motor for E-Rickshaw Application Using MCDM Tools

  • Abhinav Anand
  • Dipanjan Ghose
  • Sudeep Pradhan
  • ShabbiruddinEmail author
  • Akash Kumar Bhoi
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1040)

Abstract

Implementation and ultimate establishment of a sustainable environment require many transformations at minor levels. Vehicular emissions from traditional fuel cars have long been accounted for a major hindrance to such developments and hence to eliminate its intrusion, usage of electric vehicles (EV) is promoted. In a developing nation like India, an e-rickshaw can ensure an environment-friendly as well as economic support to the societal backbone. However, to ensure the efficient working of the e-rickshaw at optimum costs as well, the type of motor used should be placed under careful examination. In this study, brushless DC (BLDC) motors, series wound DC motors and three-phase AC induction motors were analyzed using seven multidimensional criteria comprising motor specifications, technical as well as economic factors, using the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methodology to obtain a suitable motor applicable for usage in e-rickshaws. The weights for the criteria were obtained using Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) method. The study stands quite novel in its area of application and the methodology used can be implemented in any study of similar nature.

Keywords

Electrical machines Sustainable development Electric motors Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) DEMATEL TOPSIS method EV 

References

  1. 1.
    Rajashekara, K.: History of electric vehicles in General Motors. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 30(4), 897–904 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Zeraoulia, M., Benbouzid, M., Diallo, D.: Electric motor drive selection issues for HEV propulsion systems: a comparative study. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 55(6), 1756–1764 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ghose, D., Naskar, S., Shabbiruddin: Multi-criteria analysis for industrial site selection in West Bengal (India) using Q-GIS. In: International Research Conference on Innovation, Technology and Sustainability, 24–25 Jan 2019, Manila, Philippines (2019)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ghose, D., Naskar, S., Shabbiruddin: Q-GIS-MCDA based approach to identify suitable biomass facility location in Sikkim (India). In: International Conference on Advanced Computational and Communication Paradigms 2019. Proceedings will be published in IEEE (2019)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Badang, D.A.Q., Sarip, C.F., Tahud, A.P.: Geographic information system (GIS) and multicriteria decision making (MCDM) for optimal selection of hydropower location in Rogongon, Iligan City. In: International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnolgy, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment and Management, Philippines (2018)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Srihari, K., Raval, P., Shabbiruddin: Selection of an electric motor for an equivalent internal combustion engine by TOPSIS method. In: Springer International Conference on Emerging Trends and Advances in Electrical Engineering and Renewable Energy, ETAEERE 2016. Proceedings Advances in Power Systems and Energy Management, Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol. 436. Springer, Singapore (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Das, A., Shabbiruddin: Renewable energy source selection using analytical hierarchy process and quality function deployment: a case study. In: Proceeding Published in Science Technology Engineering and Management (ICONSTEM), IEEE Xplore Digital library (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kaya, T., Kahraman, C.: Multi-criteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR and AHP methodology: the case of Istanbul. Energy 35(6), 2517–2527 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    West, J.G.W.: DC, induction, reluctance and PM motors for electric vehicles. Power Eng. J. 8(2), 77–88 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Husain, A.: Electric Machines, pp. 497–548. Dhanpat Rai & Company Publications LimitedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Husain, A.: Electric Machines, pp. 307–416. Dhanpat Rai & Company Publications LimitedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lin, H.H., Cheng, J.H.: Design process by integrating DEMATEL, and ANP methods. In: International Conference on Applied System Invention. IEEE, Japan (2018)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Niu, D.: Studies on TOPSIS arithmetic with DEMATEL weights scheme. In: Proceedings 2013 International Conference on Mechatronic Sciences, Electric Engineering and Computer (MEC), Shengyang, China (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
    Bhattacharya, A., Sarkar, B., Mukherjee, S.K.: A new method for plant location selection: a holistic approach. Int. J. Ind. Eng. Theory Appl. Pract. 11(4), 330–338 (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abhinav Anand
    • 1
  • Dipanjan Ghose
    • 1
  • Sudeep Pradhan
    • 1
  • Shabbiruddin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Akash Kumar Bhoi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Electronics EngineeringSikkim Manipal Institute of Technology, Sikkim Manipal UniversityEast SikkimIndia

Personalised recommendations