Advertisement

A Quota for Agricultural GHG Emissions (Methane and Nitrous Oxide)

  • Kate Meyer
  • Peter Newman
Chapter
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

Excessive human emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) are one of the “forcing” factors that has contributed to a change in global average temperatures by changing the balance of radiation at the top of Earth’s atmosphere. Other anthropogenic forcing factors include change in albedo (Earth’s reflectivity) due to land-use change and the emissions of aerosols and aerosol precursors. There is a Planetary Boundary for the change in radiative forcing since preindustrial times of ≤±1 W/m2.

Carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and halocarbons are called “long-lived” or “well-mixed” gases. This means that they remain in the atmosphere long enough that the location of the source of the emissions is irrelevant. The impacts are experienced on a global scale. The warming effects of long-lived gases can all be expressed in terms of equivalent emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2e). This chapter is about methane and nitrous oxide. The basis of the limit proposed for these gases is that remaining emissions would come almost entirely from agriculture and hence we have called them agricultural GHG emissions or Ag-GHGs.

To operate within the Planetary Boundaries will require a net withdrawal of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and a phase out of halocarbons to zero emissions. In contrast, it is possible to continue to emit a small amount of methane and nitrous oxide without exceeding the Planetary Boundaries. Moreover, based on current prediction, it is anticipated that small amounts of these emissions will remain necessary in order to feed the global population. If carbon dioxide, halocarbons, methane, and nitrous oxide emissions were considered collectively, it would be conceivable that the Planetary Quota could be met without withdrawal of carbon dioxide or a complete phase out of halocarbons. As such, these pressures are addressed separately, and only methane and nitrous oxide are considered collectively.

The limit for methane and nitrous oxide emissions is based on the 2100 targets for these gases under the most stringent emission reduction pathway proposed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in their fifth Assessment Report and was reinforced in the IPCC Special Report on 1.5 °C. The IPCC figures are based on almost eliminating nonagricultural emissions of both gases and optimizing the conflicting goals of minimizing emissions while maximizing agricultural output per land area in order to meet global food demands. As such, we have collectively termed these emissions agricultural GHGs, or Ag-GHGs.

The PQ for Ag-GHGs is net emissions ≤5 GtCO2e/year. This limit can be compared to the net emissions of Ag-GHGs associated with any scale of human activity—the “Ag-GHG footprint”.

References

  1. Allan W, Struthers H, Lowe DC (2007) Methane carbon isotope effects caused by atomic chlorine in the marine boundary layer: global model results compared with Southern Hemisphere measurements. J Geophys Res Atmos 112.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007369
  2. Chesick JP (1975) Atmospheric halocarbons and stratospheric ozone. Nature 254:275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ciais P, Sabine C, Bala G, Bopp L, Brovkin V, Canadell J, Chhabra A, Defries R, Galloway J, Heimann M, Jones C, Le Quéré C, Myneni RB, Piao S, Thornton P (2013) Carbon and other biogeochemical cycles. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  4. Conrad R (1996) Soil microorganisms as controllers of atmospheric trace gases (H2, CO, CH4, OCS, N2O, and NO). Microbiol Rev 60:609–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Denman KL, Brasseur G, Chidthaisong A, Ciais P, Cox PM, Dickinson RE, Hauglustaine D, Heinze C, Holland E, Jacob D, Lohmann U, Ramachandran S, Da Silva Dias PL, Wofsy SC, Zhang X (2007) Couplings between changes in the climate system and biogeochemistry. In: Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  6. Dlugokencky EJ, Bruhwiler L, White JWC, Emmons LK, Novelli PC, Montzka SA, Masarie KA, Lang PM, Crotwell AM, Miller JB, Gatti LV (2009) Observational constraints on recent increases in the atmospheric CH4 burden. Geophys Res Lett 36.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL039780
  7. Frankenberg C, Aben I, Bergamaschi P, Dlugokencky EJ, van Hees R, Houweling S, van der Meer P, Snel R, Tol P (2011) Global column-averaged methane mixing ratios from 2003 to 2009 as derived from SCIAMACHY: trends and variability. J Geophys Res Atmos 116.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014849
  8. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  9. IPCC (2013a) Annex II: Climate system scenario tables. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  10. IPCC (2013b) Summary for policymakers. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley P (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  11. IPCC (2014) Summary for policymakers. In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel ES, Levy AN, MacCracken S, Mastrandrea PR, White LL (eds) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  12. Myhre G, Shindell D, Bréon F-M, Collins W, Fuglestvedt J, Huang J, Koch D, Lamarque J-F, Lee D, Mendoza B, Nakajima T, Robock A, Stephens G, Takemura T, Zhang H (2013) Anthropogenic and natural radiative forcing. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  13. Prather M, Flato G, Friedlingstein P, Jones C, Lamarque JL, Liao H, Rasch P (2013) Annex II: Climate system scenario tables. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  14. Rice AL, Butenhoff CL, Teama DG, Röger FH, Khalil MAK, Rasmussen RA (2016) Atmospheric methane isotopic record favors fossil sources flat in 1980s and 1990s with recent increase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:10791–10796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rigby M, Prinn RG, Fraser PJ, Simmonds PG, Langenfelds RL, Huang J, Cunnold DM, Steele LP, Krummel PB, Weiss RF, Doherty S, Salameh PK, Wang HJ, Harth CM, Mühle J, Porter LW (2008) Renewed growth of atmospheric methane. Geophys Res Lett 35.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036037
  16. Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson A, Chapin FS, Lambin E, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, De Wit CA, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sorlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley J (2009) Planetary Boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol Soc 14:32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rogelj J, Shindell D, Jiang K, Fifita S, Forster P, Ginzburg V, Handa C, Kheshgi H, Kobayashi S, Kriegler E, Mundaca L, Séférian R, Vilariño MV (2018) Mitigation pathways compatible with 1.5 °C in the context of sustainable development. In: Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pörtner HO, Roberts D, Skea J, Shukla PR, Pirani A, Moufouma-Okia W, Péan C, Pidcock R, Connors S, Matthews JBR, Chen Y, Zhou X, Gomis MI, Lonnoy E, Maycock T, Tignor M, Waterfield T (eds) Global warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. IPCC, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  18. Strahan SE, Douglass AR (2018) Decline in Antarctic ozone depletion and lower stratospheric chlorine determined from aura microwave limb sounder observations. Geophys Res Lett 45:382–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. UN (2016) Montreal protocol - submission to the high-level political forum on sustainable development (HLPF) 2016. Geneva, United Nations Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform: UNGoogle Scholar
  20. Willett W, Rockstrom J, Loken B, Springmann M, Lang T, Vermeulen S, Garnett T, Tilman D, Declerck F, Wood A, Jonell M, Clark M, Gordon LJ, Fanzo J, Hawkes C, Zurayk R, Rivera JA, De Vries W, Majele Sibanda L, Afshin A, Chaudhary A, Herrero M, Agustina R, Branca F, Lartey A, Fan S, Crona B, Fox E, Bignet V, Troell M, Lindahl T, Singh S, Cornell SE, Srinath Reddy K, Narain S, Nishtar S, Murray CJL (2019) Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet 393:447–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kate Meyer
    • 1
  • Peter Newman
    • 2
  1. 1.The Planetary Accounting NetworkAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.Curtin UniversityWestern AustraliaAustralia

Personalised recommendations