A Quota for Ozone-Depleting Substances

  • Kate Meyer
  • Peter Newman


A thin layer of ozone in the atmosphere protects humans and terrestrial life from harmful ultraviolet radiation. The human creation and emission of ozone-depleting substances has thinned this layer so much that once a year a large localized region with almost no ozone appears over Antarctica. This is known as the hole in the ozone layer.

In 1989, a global treaty was put into place to ban the manufacture and use of substances which deplete the ozone layer, the Montreal Protocol. By 2009 the protocol had been ratified by every country. There has been a reduction of almost 98% in the use of ozone-depleting substances. The ozone hole is starting to get smaller.

The hole in the ozone layer is an example of how human activity can alter global Earth-system processes. It is also an example of how the global population can work together to begin to repair past environmental damage. It is thought that provided we respect the terms of the Montreal Protocol, the hole will repair itself before the end of this century. Thus, the Planetary Quota for ozone is zero emission of ozone-depleting substances listed under the Montreal Protocol. Ozone-depleting substances can be converted to a unit of “ozone-depleting potential” tonnes. This unit can be used to compare emissions of Montreal gases of any scale of human activity to the Planetary Quota limit.


  1. Chesick JP (1975) Atmospheric halocarbons and stratospheric ozone. Nature 254:275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chipperfield MP, Fioletov VE, Bregman B, Burrows JP, Connor BJ, Haigh JD, Harris NRP, Hauchecorne A, Hood LL, Kawa SR, Krzyscin JW, Logan JA, Muthama NJ, Polvani L, Randel WJ, Sasaki T, Stähelin J, Stolarski RS, Thomason LW, Zawodny JM (2006) Global ozone: past and present. WMO (World Meteorological Organization). Scientific assessment of ozone depletion. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, United Nations Environment Programme. World Meteorological Organization and European Commission, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  3. Clerbaux C, Cunnold DM, Anderson J, Engel A, Fraser PJ, Mahieu E, Manning A, Miller J, Montzka S, Nassar R, Prinn R, Reimann S, Rinsland CP, Simmonds P, Verdonik D, Weiss R, Wuebbles DA, Yokouchi Y (2006) Long-lived compounds. WMO (World Meteorological Organization). Scientific assessment of ozone depletion. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, United Nations Environment Programme, World Meteorological Organization, and European Commission, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  4. Fahey DW (2003) Twenty questions and answers about the ozone layer. Scientific assessment of ozone depletion: 2002. Global ozone research and monitoring project—report no. 47. World Meteorological Organisation, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  5. Farman JC, Gardiner BG, Shanklin JD (1985) Large losses of total ozone in Antarctica reveal seasonal ClOx/NOx interaction. Nature 315:207–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson A, Chapin FS, Lambin E, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, De Wit CA, Hughes T, Van Der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sorlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley J (2009) Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol Soc 14:32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Solomon S, Ivy DJ, Kinnison D, Mills MJ, Neely RR, Schmidt A (2016) Emergence of healing in the Antarctic ozone layer. Science 353:269–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Stocker L, Newman P, Duggie J (2012) Climate change and perth (South West Australia). In: Blakely E, Carbonell A (eds) Resilient coastal regions: planning for climate change in the United States and Australia. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  9. Strahan SE, Douglass AR (2018) Decline in Antarctic ozone depletion and lower stratospheric chlorine determined from aura microwave limb sounder observations. Geophys Res Lett 45:382–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. UNEP (1999) UNEP report on bromide phase out—a handbook for national ozone unitsGoogle Scholar
  11. UNEP (2017a) The Montreal Protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer. Accessed 22 Dec 2017
  12. UNEP (2017b) Treaties and decisions. Accessed 22 Dec 2017
  13. Unknown (2015) Earth-atmosphere-layers.jpg. WikimediaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kate Meyer
    • 1
  • Peter Newman
    • 2
  1. 1.The Planetary Accounting NetworkAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.Curtin UniversityWestern AustraliaAustralia

Personalised recommendations