Advertisement

Physical, Morphological, Structural, Thermal and Mechanical Properties of Pineapple Leaf Fibers

  • C. H. LeeEmail author
  • A. Khalina
  • S. H. Lee
  • F. N. M. Padzil
  • Z. M. A. Ainun
Chapter
  • 4 Downloads
Part of the Green Energy and Technology book series (GREEN)

Abstract

Natural fibers have drawn significant attention globally for its adverse effect on the environment, lower cost and superior performance. Leaf or hard fibers are tough plant fibers, extracted from leaves of a monocotyledonous plant which has parallel-veined leaves. Pineapple leaf fibers (PALFs) are usually disposed of with an extremely low value due to lack of adequate skills. With a suitable platform, it can be fully utilized. PALF was found to be very high in cellulose contents which contribute to high strength performance. However, various factors make it perform differently. The changes in density and diameter of PALF had been found closely related to its strength. Apart from this, surface morphology of PALF reviewed that the location of leaf fiber and surface conditions provided various interlocking quality and optimum applications. On the other hand, PALF treatment observed better strength properties with evidence under infrared spectroscopy. The nanofibrils PALF from acid hydrolysis treatment provided better adhesion force and higher crystallinity index but high hydrophilicity verified by high moisture absorptions. Higher crystallinity index provided the fiber a good strength performance and an excellent spinnability, which allows it to be used in yarn and textile industries. On the contrary, high cellulose content of PALF has a promising fire-retardant behavior. PALF has a high potential for advanced material substitutions. Unfortunately, underutilized PALF is only disposed of as landfills and low-cost feedstock. The development and utilization of PALF could be the solution for the disposal problem as well as to increase the national income of a country.

Keywords

Pineapple leaf fibers Mechanical properties Physical properties Thermal properties Morphological properties 

References

  1. 1.
    Ain Ibrahim N, Azraaie N, Aimi Mohd Zainul Abidin N, mamat razali NA, Abdul Aziz F, Zakaria S (2014) Preparation and characterization of alpha cellulose of pineapple (Ananas comosus) leaf fibres (PALF). Adv Mat Res, 895, 147–150. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.895.147
  2. 2.
    Alwani MS, Khalil A, Islam MN, Nadirah WW, Dungani R (2014) Fundamental approaches for the application of pineapple leaf fiber in high performance reinforced composites. Polimery 59.  https://doi.org/10.14314/polimery.2014.798
  3. 3.
    Asim M, Abdan K, Jawaid M, Nasir M, Dashtizadeh Z, Ishak MR, Hoque ME (2015) A review on pineapple leaves fibre and its composites. Int J Polym Sci 2015:16.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/950567 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Asim M, Jawaid M, Abdan K, Ishak MR (2016) Effect of alkali and silane treatments on mechanical and fibre-matrix bond strength of kenaf and pineapple leaf fibres. J Bionic Eng 13(3):426–435.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(16)60315-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Balakrishnan P, Gopi S, Geethamma VG, Kalarikkal N, Thomas S (2018) Cellulose nanofiber vs nanocrystals from pineapple leaf fiber: a comparative studies on reinforcing efficiency on starch nanocomposites. Macromol Symposia 380(1):1800102.  https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.201800102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Balakrishnan P, Sreekala MS, Kunaver M, Huskic M, Thomas S (2017) Morphology, transport characteristics and viscoelastic polymer chain confinement in nanocomposites based on thermoplastic potato starch and cellulose nanofibers from pineapple leaf. Carbohydr Polym, 169, 176–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.04.017
  7. 7.
    Bartholomew D, Paull R, Rohrbach DP (2003) The pineapple: botany, production and uses. CABI Publishing, WallingfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bunsell AR, Joannès S, Marcellan A (2018) 2—Testing and characterization of fibers. In: Bunsell AR (ed) Handbook of properties of textile and technical fibres, 2nd ed. Woodhead Publishing, pp 21–55.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-101272-7.00002-X
  9. 9.
    Chen W, Yu H, Liu Y, Chen P, Zhang M, Hai Y (2011) Individualization of cellulose nanofibers from wood using high-intensity ultrasonication combined with chemical pretreatments. Carbohyd Polym 83(4):1804–1811.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.10.040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen W, Yu H, Liu Y, Hai Y, Zhang M, Chen P (2011) Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from four plant cellulose fibers using a chemical-ultrasonic process. Cellulose 18(2):433–442.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-011-9497-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen X, Yu J, Zhang Z, Lu C (2011) Study on structure and thermal stability properties of cellulose fibers from rice straw. Carbohyd Polym 85(1):245–250.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.02.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cherian BM, Leão AL, de Souza SF, Costa LMM, de Olyveira GM, Kottaisamy M, Nagarajan ER, Thomas S (2011) Cellulose nanocomposites with nanofibres isolated from pineapple leaf fibers for medical applications. Carbohyd Polym 86(4):1790–1798.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.07.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cherian BM, Leão AL, de Souza SF, Thomas S, Pothan LA, Kottaisamy M (2010) Isolation of nanocellulose from pineapple leaf fibres by steam explosion. Carbohyd Polym 81(3):720–725.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.03.046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chirayil CJ, Joy J, Mathew L, Mozetic M, Koetz J, Thomas S (2014) Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibrils from Helicteres isora plant. Ind Crops Prod 59:27–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.04.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dashtizadeh Z, Khalina A, Cardona F, Lee CH (2019) Mechanical characteristics of green composites of short kenaf bast fiber reinforced in cardanol. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2019:6.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8645429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Daud Z, Zainuri Mohd Hatta M, Kassim A, Awang H, Mohd Aripin A (2013) Exploring of agro waste (pineapple leaf, corn stalk, and napier grass) by chemical composition and morphological study. BioResources 9.  https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.9.1.872-880
  17. 17.
    Gebino G, Muhammed N (2018) Extraction and characterization of ethiopian pineapple leaf fiber. Curr Trends Fash Technol Text Eng 4(4):1–7.  https://doi.org/10.19080/CTFTTE.2018.04.555644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    George J, Bhagawan S, Prabhakaran N, Thomas S (1995) Short pineapple-leaf-fiber-reinforced low-density polyethylene composites. J Appl Polym Sci 57.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1995.070570708
  19. 19.
    Grumo J, Jabber LJ, Patricio J, Magdadaro MR, Lubguban A, Alguno A (2017) Alkali and bleach treatment of the extracted cellulose from pineapple (Ananas comosus) leaves. J Fundam Appl Sci 9.  https://doi.org/10.4314/jfas.v9i7s.13
  20. 20.
    Hao LC, Sapuan SM, Hassan MR, Sheltami RM (2018) 2—Natural fiber reinforced vinyl polymer composites. In: Sapuan SM, Ismail H, Zainudin ES (eds) Natural fibre reinforced vinyl ester and vinyl polymer composites. Woodhead Publishing, pp 27–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102160-6.00002-0
  21. 21.
    Hermans PH, Weidinger A (1961) Quantitative investigation of the X-ray diffraction picture of some typical rayon specimens: Part I. Text Res J 31(6):558–571.  https://doi.org/10.1177/004051756103100607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hong Dong C, Lv Z, Zhang L, Jie Shen H, Na Li N, Zhu P (2014) Structure and characteristics of pineapple leaf fibers obtained from pineapple leaves. Adv Mater Res 998–999. www.scientific.net/AMR.998-999.316
  23. 23.
    Hossain F (2016) World pineapple production: an overview. Afr J Food Agric Nutri Dev 16.  https://doi.org/10.18697/ajfand.76.15620
  24. 24.
    Huda MS, Drzal LT, Mohanty AK, Misra M (2008) Effect of chemical modifications of the pineapple leaf fiber surfaces on the interfacial and mechanical properties of laminated biocomposites. Compos Interfaces 15(2–3):169–191.  https://doi.org/10.1163/156855408783810920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jain J, Jain S, Sinha S (2018) Characterization and thermal kinetic analysis of pineapple leaf fibers and their reinforcement in epoxy. J Elastom Plast 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0095244318783024
  26. 26.
    Kabir M, Islam M, Wang HAO (2013) Mechanical and thermal properties of jute fibre reinforced composites, vol 1. J Multifunct Compos.  https://doi.org/10.12783/issn.2168-4286/1.1/islam
  27. 27.
    Kaewpirom S, Worrarat C (2014) Preparation and properties of pineapple leaf fiber reinforced poly(lactic acid) green composites. Fibers Polym 15.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-014-1469-0
  28. 28.
    Kang J, Dengler N (2004) Vein pattern development in adult leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana. Int J Plant Sci 165(2):231–242.  https://doi.org/10.1086/382794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kang S-K, Lee D-B, Choi N-S (2009) Fiber/epoxy interfacial shear strength measured by the microdroplet test. Compos Sci Technol 69(2):245–251.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.10.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kaushik A, Singh M, Verma G (2010) Green nanocomposites based on thermoplastic starch and steam exploded cellulose nanofibrils from wheat straw. Carbohyd Polym 82(2):337–345.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.04.063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lee CH, Sapuan SM, Hassan MR (2018) Thermal analysis of kenaf fiber reinforced floreon biocomposites with magnesium hydroxide flame retardant filler. Polym Compos 39(3):869–875.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.24010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lee CH, Sapuan SM, Lee JH, Hassan MR (2016) Melt volume flow rate and melt flow rate of kenaf fibre reinforced floreon/magnesium hydroxide biocomposites. SpringerPlus 5(1):1680.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3044-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lee CH, Salit MS, Hassan MR (2014) A review of the flammability factors of kenaf and allied fibre reinforced polymer composites. Adv Mater Sci Eng 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/514036
  34. 34.
    Leão AL, Cherian BM, Narine S, Souza SF, Sain M, Thomas S (2015) 7—The use of pineapple leaf fibers (PALFs) as reinforcements in composites. In: Faruk O, Sain M (eds) Biofiber reinforcements in composite materials. Woodhead Publishing, pp 211–235.  https://doi.org/10.1533/9781782421276.2.211
  35. 35.
    Lim WC, Srinivasakannan C, Al Shoaibi A (2015) Cleaner production of porous carbon from palm shells through recovery and reuse of phosphoric acid. J Clean Prod 102:501–511.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Luo S, Netravali AN (1999) Interfacial and mechanical properties of environment-friendly “green” composites made from pineapple fibers and poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-valerate) resin. J Mater Sci 34(15):3709–3719.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1004659507231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mahardika M, Abral H, Kasim A, Arief S, Asrofi M (2018) Production of nanocellulose from pineapple leaf fibers via high-shear homogenization and ultrasonication. Fibers 6(2):28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Manfredi LB, Rodríguez ES, Wladyka-Przybylak M, Vázquez A (2006) Thermal degradation and fire resistance of unsaturated polyester, modified acrylic resins and their composites with natural fibres. Polym Degrad Stab 91(2):255–261.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.05.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Maniruzzaman M, Rahman MA, Gafur MA, Fabritius H, Raabe D (2012) Modification of pineapple leaf fibers and graft copolymerization of acrylonitrile onto modified fibers. J Compos Mater 46(1):79–90.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998311410486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mecánica I, Jaramillo N, Hoyos D, Santa J (2016) Composites with pineapple-leaf fibers manufactured by layered compression molding. Ingeniería y competitividad 18Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mittal M, Chaudhary R (2018) Experimental study on the water absorption and surface characteristics of alkali treated pineapple leaf fibre and coconut husk fibre. Int J Appl Eng Res 13.15 (2018): 12237–12243Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mohamed AR, Sapuan SM, Shahjahan M, Khalina A (2009) Characterization of pineapple leaf fibers from selected Malaysian cultivars. J Food Agric Environ 7(1):235–240Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mopoung S, Amornsakchai P (2016) Microporous activated carbon fiber from pineapple leaf fiber by H3PO4 activation. Asian J Sci Res 9:24–33.  https://doi.org/10.3923/ajsr.2016.24.33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Morán JI, Alvarez VA, Cyras VP, Vázquez A (2008) Extraction of cellulose and preparation of nanocellulose from sisal fibers. Cellulose 15(1):149–159.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-007-9145-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mwaikambo L (2006) Review of the history, properties and application of plant fibres. Afr J Sci Technol 7(2):120–133Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ndungu S (2014) A report on conventional pineapple production in Kenya Swedish Society for Nature Conservation (SSNC), SwedenGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Neild RE, Boshell F (1976) An agroclimatic procedure and survey of the pineapple production potential of Colombia. Agric Meteorol 17(2):81–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-1571(76)90024-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Nelson ML, O’Connor RT (1964) Relation of certain infrared bands to cellulose crystallinity and crystal latticed type. Part I. Spectra of lattice types I, II, III and of amorphous cellulose. J Appl Polym Sci 8(3):1311–1324.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1964.070080322
  49. 49.
    Oliveira Glória G, Altoe G, Amoy Netto P, Margem F, de Oliveira Braga F, Neves Monteiro S (2016) Density Weibull analysis of pineapple leaf fibers (PALF) with different diameters. Mater Sci Forum 869. www.scientific.net/MSF.869.384
  50. 50.
    Park S, Baker JO, Himmel ME, Parilla PA, Johnson DK (2010) Cellulose crystallinity index: measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulase performance. Biotechnol Biofuels 3:10.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-3-10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Pickering KL, Efendy MGA, Le TM (2016) A review of recent developments in natural fibre composites and their mechanical performance. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 83:98–112.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Pietak A, Korte-Kerzel S, Tan E, Downard A, Staiger M (2007) Atomic force microscopy characterization of the surface wettability of natural fibres. Appl Surf Sci 253.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.07.082
  53. 53.
    Pitkethly MJ, Favre JP, Gaur U, Jakubowski J, Mudrich SF, Caldwell DL, Drzal LT, Nardin M, Wagner HD, Di Landro L, Hampe A, Armistead JP, Desaeger M, Verpoest I (1993) A round-robin programme on interfacial test methods. Compos Sci Technol 48(1):205–214.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(93)90138-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Poletto M, Ornaghi HL, Zattera AJ (2014) Native cellulose: structure, characterization and thermal properties. Mater (Basel) 7(9):6105–6119.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma7096105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Poletto M, Zattera AJ, Santana RMC (2012) Structural differences between wood species: evidence from chemical composition, FTIR spectroscopy, and thermogravimetric analysis. J Appl Polym Sci 126(S1):E337–E344.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.36991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Pornwannachai W, Ebdon JR, Kandola BK (2018) Fire-resistant natural fibre-reinforced composites from flame retarded textiles. Polym Degrad Stab 154:115–123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2018.05.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Prado KdSd, Spinacé MAdS (2015) Characterization of fibers from pineapple’s crown, rice husks and cotton textile residues. Mater Res 18:530–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Py C, Lacoeuilhe JJ, Teisson C (1987) The pineapple: cultivation and uses. Maisonneuve & Larose, ParisGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Rachini A, Le Troedec M, Peyratout C, Smith A (2009) Comparison of the thermal degradation of natural, alkali-treated and silane-treated hemp fibers under air and an inert atmosphere. J Appl Polym Sci 112(1):226–234.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.29412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Ramos Cassellis M, Sánchez-Pardo M, López MR, Mora-Escobedo R (2014) Structural, physicochemical and functional properties of industrial residues of pineapple (Ananas comosus). Cell Chem Technol, 48, 633–641Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Rao KMM, Rao KM (2007) Extraction and tensile properties of natural fibers: Vakka, date and bamboo. Compos Struct 77(3):288–295.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.07.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Revol BP, Thomassey M, Ruch F, Bouquey M, Nardin M (2017) Single fibre model composite: interfacial shear strength measurements between reactive polyamide-6 and cellulosic or glass fibres by microdroplet pullout test. Compos Sci Technol 148:9–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.05.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Roman M, Winter W (2004) Effect of sulfate groups from sulfuric acid hydrolysis on the thermal degradation behavior of bacterial cellulose. Biomacromolecules 5.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm034519+
  64. 64.
    Roque R, Muñoz-Acosta F, Roy Soto F, Mata-Segreda J (2013) An anatomical comparison between bunch and fruit of oil palm with pineapple leaf and three woods from plantations in costa rica. J Oil Palm Res 25Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Saha SC, Das BK, Ray PK, Pandey SN, Goswami K (1991) Infrared spectra of raw and chemically modified pineapple leaf fiber (Annanus comosus). J Appl Polym Sci 43(10):1885–1890.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1991.070431013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Samal RK, Ray MC (1997) Effect of chemical modifications on FTIR spectra. II. Physicochemical behavior of pineapple leaf fiber (PALF). J Appl Polym Sci 64(11):2119–2125Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Sanjay MR, Siengchin S, Parameswaranpillai J, Jawaid M, Pruncu CI, Khan A (2019) A comprehensive review of techniques for natural fibers as reinforcement in composites: preparation, processing and characterization. Carbohydr Polym 207:108–121.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.11.083
  68. 68.
    Santos RMd, Flauzino Neto WP, Silvério HA, Martins DF, Dantas NO, Pasquini D (2013) Cellulose nanocrystals from pineapple leaf, a new approach for the reuse of this agro-waste. Ind Crops Prod 50:707–714.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.08.049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Sathishkumar TP, Navaneethakrishnan P, Shankar S, Rajasekar R (2013) Characterization of new cellulose sansevieria ehrenbergii fibers for polymer composites. Compos Interfaces 20(8):575–593.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15685543.2013.816652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE, Conrad CM (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Text Res J 29(10):786–794.  https://doi.org/10.1177/004051755902901003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Seki Y, Sarikanat M, Sever K, Durmuşkahya C (2013) Extraction and properties of Ferula communis (chakshir) fibers as novel reinforcement for composites materials. Compos B Eng 44(1):517–523.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.03.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Sena Neto AR, Araujo MAM, Barboza RMP, Fonseca AS, Tonoli GHD, Souza FVD, Mattoso LHC, Marconcini JM (2015) Comparative study of 12 pineapple leaf fiber varieties for use as mechanical reinforcement in polymer composites. Ind Crops Prod 64:68–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.10.042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Sena Neto AR, Araujo MAM, Souza FVD, Mattoso LHC, Marconcini JM (2013) Characterization and comparative evaluation of thermal, structural, chemical, mechanical and morphological properties of six pineapple leaf fiber varieties for use in composites. Ind Crops Prod 43:529–537.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.08.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Senthamaraikannan P, Saravanakumar SS, Arthanarieswaran VP, Sugumaran P (2015) Physicochemical properties of new cellulosic fibers from bark of Acacia planifrons. Int J Polym Anal Charact 21.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1023666x.2016.1133138
  75. 75.
    Silva MC, Lopes OR, Colodette JL, Porto AO, Rieumont J, Chaussy D, Belgacem MN, Silva GG (2008) Characterization of three non-product materials from a bleached eucalyptus kraft pulp mill, in view of valorising them as a source of cellulose fibres. Ind Crops Prod 27(3):288–295.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2007.11.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Sipiao BLS, Paiva RLM, Goulart SAS, Mulinari DR (2011) Effect of chemical modification on mechanical behaviour of polypropylene reinforced pineapple crown fibers composites. Procedia Engineer, 10, 2028–2033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.336
  77. 77.
    Siqueira G, Bras J, Dufresne A (2010) Luffa cylindrica as a lignocellulosic source of fiber, microfibrillated cellulose and cellulose nanocrystals. BioResources 5(2)Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Siregar J, Sapuan S, Ab Rahman MZ, Mohd Dahlan KZH (2011) Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calometric (DSC) analysis of pineapple leaf fibre (PALF) reinforced high impact polystyrene (HIPS) composites. Pertanika J Sci Technol 19(1):161–170Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Teles MCA, Glória GO, Altoé GR, Amoy Netto P, Margem FM, Braga FO, Monteiro SN (2015) Evaluation of the diameter influence on the tensile strength of pineapple leaf fibers (PALF) by Weibull method. Mater Res 18:185–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Varma I, Anantha Krishnan SR, Krishnamoorthy S (1989) Effect of chemical treatment on density and crystallinity of jute fibers. Textile Res J 59.  https://doi.org/10.1177/004051758905900609
  81. 81.
    Versino F, García MA (2014) Cassava (Manihot esculenta) starch films reinforced with natural fibrous filler. Ind Crops Prod 58:305–314.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.04.040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Wada M, Okano T (2001) Localization of Iα and Iβ phases in algal cellulose revealed by acid treatments. Cellulose 8(3):183–188.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013196220602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Wada M, Sugiyama J, Okano T (1993) Native celluloses on the basis of two crystalline phase (Iα/Iβ) system. J Appl Polym Sci 49(8):1491–1496.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1993.070490817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Yusof Y, bin Mat Nawi N, Bin Alias MSH (2016) Pineapple leaf fiber and pineapple peduncle fiber analyzing and characterization for yarn production. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 11Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Zhandarov SF, Pisanova EV (1996) Two interfacial shear strength calculations based on the single fiber composite test. Mech Compos Mater 31(4):325–336.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00632619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Zhao J, Zhang W, Zhang X, Zhang X, Lu C, Deng Y (2013) Extraction of cellulose nanofibrils from dry softwood pulp using high shear homogenization. Carbohyd Polym 97(2):695–702.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.05.050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Zin MH, Abdan K, Mazlan N, Zainudin ES, Liew KE (2018) The effects of alkali treatment on the mechanical and chemical properties of pineapple leaf fibres (PALF) and adhesion to epoxy resin. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 368(1):012035CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. H. Lee
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. Khalina
    • 2
  • S. H. Lee
    • 1
  • F. N. M. Padzil
    • 1
  • Z. M. A. Ainun
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Tropical Forestry and Forest Products (INTROP)Universiti Putra MalaysiaSerdangMalaysia
  2. 2.Engineering FacultyUniversiti Putra MalaysiaSerdangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations