Corrosion Performance Evaluation of Rebar in Metakaolin Blended Concrete

  • U. Raghu BabuEmail author
  • B. Kondraivendhan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 61)


Reinforcement corrosion is of obvious importance in reinforced structures in harsh environments. The presence of sulfates may influence the chloride-induced corrosion of rebar in concrete. In this paper, the results of an experimental investigation are presented wherein the influence of chloride and chloride plus sulfate ions on the corrosivity of rebar embedded in ordinary Portland cement (OPC) and OPC blended with metakaolin (MK) concretes has been investigated. In this investigation, concrete mixtures have been prepared with four replacement levels of OPC (0, 5, 10, and 15%) with MK and water to cementitious material ratio 0.5. Reinforced concrete specimens were exposed to pure chloride solution. Further, to investigate the influence of sulfate concentration on chloride-induced corrosion, the samples were exposed to the composite solution of chloride and sulfate ions of various concentrations. The corrosion performance of rebar has been monitored by the half-cell potential values. Besides, an impressed voltage technique for accelerated corrosion test has also adopted to investigate the optimum replacement level of cement with MK as a short-term technique. Results of accelerated corrosion test indicated that beyond 10% MK, the concrete was found to be less corrosion resistant. From potential measurements, it was observed that the presence of magnesium sulfate with chlorides influences the time to initiation of corrosion in both plain and MK blended concretes.


Impressed voltage Corrosion Metakaolin Sulfates Chlorides 


  1. 1.
    Rashad, A. M. (2015). A synopsis about the effect of metakaolin on the durability of Portland cement—An overview. Scientia Iranica. Transaction A, Civil Engineering, 22, 579–604.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Parande, A. K., Ramesh Babu, B., Aswin Karthik, M., Deepak Kumaar, K. K., & Palaniswamy, N. (2008). Study on strength and corrosion performance for steel embedded in metakaolin blended concrete/mortar. Construction and Building Materials, 22, 127–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Antoni, M., Rossen, J., Martirena, F., & Scrivener, K. (2012). Cement and concrete research cement substitution by a combination of metakaolin and limestone. Cement and Concrete Research, 42, 1579–1589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li, Q., Geng, H., Huang, Y., & Shui, Z. (2015). Chloride resistance of concrete with metakaolin addition and seawater mixing: A comparative study. Construction and Building Materials, 101, 184–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shi, Z., Shui, Z., Li, Q., & Geng, H. (2015). Combined effect of metakaolin and sea water on performance and microstructures of concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 74, 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang, G. M., Kong, Y., Shui, Z. H., Li, Q., & Han, J. L. (2014). Experimental investigation on chloride diffusion and binding in concrete containing metakaolin. Corrosion Engineering, Science and Technology, 49, 282–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brooks, J. J., & Johari, M. M. (2001). Effect of metakaolin on creep and shrinkage of concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 23(6), 495–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li, Z., & Ding, Z. (2003). Property improvement of Portland cement by incorporating with metakaolin and slag. Cement and Concrete Research, 33(4), 579–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Khatib, J. M., & Wild, S. (1996). Pore size distribution of metakaolin paste. Cement and Concrete Research, 26(10), 1545–1553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Poon, C. S., Kou, S. C., & Lam, L. (2002). Pore size distribution of high performance metakaolin concrete. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology-Materials Science Edition, 17, 42–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Güneyisi, E., Gesoğlu, M., & Mermerdaş, K. (2008). Improving strength, drying shrinkage, and pore structure of concrete using metakaolin. Materials and Structures, 41, 937–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khatib, J. M., & Wild, S. (1998). Sulphate Resistance of metakaolin mortar. Cement and Concrete Research, 28(1), 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    ASTM C 876. (1999). Standard test method for half-cell potentials of uncoated reinforcing steel in concrete.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vedalakshmi, R., Balamurugan, L., Saraswathy, V., Kim, S. H., & Ann, K. Y. (2010). Reliability of galvanostatic pulse technique in assessing the corrosion rate of rebar in concrete structures: Laboratory vs field studies. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 14, 867–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sudheer, S., Babu, U. R., & Kondraivendhan, B. (2019). Influence of metakaolin and red mud blended cement on reinforcement corrosion in presence of chloride and sulfate ions. In B. B. Das & N. Neithalath (Eds.), Sustainable construction and building materials. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering (pp. 717–725). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Applied Mechanics DepartmentSardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of TechnologySuratIndia

Personalised recommendations