Advertisement

Effect of Rice Husk Ash and Silica Fume as Strength-Enhancing Materials on Properties of Modern Concrete—A Comprehensive Review

  • Shaswat Kumar DasEmail author
  • Saurabh Kumar Singh
  • Jyotirmoy Mishra
  • Syed Mohammed Mustakim
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 61)

Abstract

Achieving a concrete with good strength and durability using OPC is quite challenging in the present scenario as per the environmental exposures are concerned. Hence, Geopolymer concrete, concrete without cement, has proved to be a better alternative and qualifies to be a concrete for modern-age constructions. Modern concrete production should promote the idea of sustainable utilization of various industrial by-products such as fly ash, silica fume, Rice Husk Ash, ground-granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS), and many more which are pozzolanic in nature. And the old conventional method of making concrete using OPC should be minimized gradually as cement production is a potential threat to environment due to huge carbon footprints leading to global warming. So the major challenge of concrete makers is to develop and implement newer construction materials which will enhance strength and durability of concrete. High-strength Geopolymer concrete and blended OPC-based concrete are the most important research areas which need to be encouraged at a higher scale for making durable high-rise structures utilizing strength-enhancing materials. In this review, the effects of incorporation of strength-enhancing materials, i.e., silica fume and Rice Husk Ash on Geopolymer concrete and OPC-based concrete, are discussed with necessary comparisons from various research studies around the world.

Keywords

Geopolymer concrete Pozzolanic Strength-enhancing material Rice Husk Ash 

References

  1. 1.
    Global cement production from 1990 to 2013 (in million metric tons), ©Statista 2018.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    McCaffrey, R. (2002). Climate change and the cement industry. Global Cement and Lime Magazine (Environmental Special Issue), 15–19.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davidovits, J. (1988). Soft mineralogy and geopolymers. In Proceedings of the of Geopolymer 88 International Conference. Compiègne, France: Université de Technologie.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moon, H. Y. (2003). Seung-Tae Lee, and Seong-Soo Kim, Sulphate resistance of silica fume blended mortars exposed to various sulphate solutions. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 30, 625–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Okoye, F. N., Durgaprasad, J., & Singh, N. B. (2016). Effect of silica fume on the mechanical properties of fly ash based-geopolymer concrete. Ceramics International. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.10.084.
  6. 6.
    Das, S. K., & Patel, A. (2018). Potential of Rice Husk Ash in Concrete Production: A Literature Review, Second International Conference on Advances in Concrete, Structural and Geo-technical Engineering, BITS Pilani, Rajasthan, India. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324079453.
  7. 7.
    Mehta, P. K. (1992). Rice husk ash—A unique supplementary cementing material. In Proceedings of the CANMET/ACI International Symposium on Advances in Concrete Technology, ed. V. M. Malhotra, 407–430. Athens, Greece.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nagrale, S. D., Hajare, H., & Modak, P. R. (2012). Utilization of rice husk ash. International Journal of Engineering Research, 2(4), 001–005.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Le, H. T. (2015). Behaviour of rice husk ash in self-compacting high performance concrete (Ph.D thesis). Institute for Building Materials Science, Bauhaus University Weimar, Germany.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chao-Lung, H., Le Anh-Tuan, B., & Chun-Tsun, C. (2011). Effect of rice husk ash on the strength and durability characteristics of concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 25(9), 3768–3772.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zerbino, R., Giaccio, G., & Isaia, G. C. (2011). Concrete incorporating rice-husk ash without processing. Construction and Building Materials, 25(1), 371–378.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Karthikeyan, A. (2013). Influence of Silicafume in Self Compacting Concrete Under Its Fresh and Hardened State, 7th Rilem Conference on Self Compacting Concrete, Paris, France. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306285931.
  13. 13.
    Joshua Daniela, A., Sivakamasundaria, S., & Nishantha, A. (2017). Study on partial replacement of silica fume based geopolymer concrete beam behavior under torsion. Procedia Engineering.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Srivastava, V., Kumar, R., Agarwal, V. C., & Mehta, P. K. (2014). Effect of silica fume on workability and compressive strength of OPC concrete. Journal of Environment and Nanotechnology.  https://doi.org/10.13074/jent.2014.09.143086.
  15. 15.
    Chindaprasirt, P., & Chalee, W. (2014). Effect of sodium hydroxide concentration on chloride penetration and steel corrosion of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete under marine site. Construction and Building Materials, 63, 303–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rostami, M., & Behfarnia, K. (2017). The effect of silica fume on durability of alkali activated slag concrete. Construction and Building Materials. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.072.
  17. 17.
    Khedr, S. A., & Abou-Zeid, M. N. (1994, August). Characteristics of silica-fume concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 6(3), 357–375.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kumar, P. C., & Rao, P. M. (2010). Benefits of use of rice husk ash in concrete. Journal of Industrial Pollution Control, 26(2), 239–241.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ismail, M. S., & Waliuddin, A. M. (1996). Effect of rice husk ash on high strength concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 10(7), 521–526.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-0618(96)00010-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kumar, A., Tomar, A. K., Gupta, S. K., & Kumar, A. (2016, July). Replacement of cement in concrete with rice husk ash. SSRG International Journal of Civil Engineering (SSRG-IJCE), 3(7).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zabihi, S. M., Tavakoli, H., & Mohseni, E. (2018). Engineering and microstructural properties of fiber-reinforced rice husk–ash based geopolymer concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0002379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ramani, P. V., & Chinnaraj, P. K. (2015). Geopolymer concrete with ground granulated blast furnace slag and black rice husk ash. Građevinar.  https://doi.org/10.14256/jce.1208,2015.
  23. 23.
    Dara, D. R., & Bhogayata, A. C. (2015). Experimental study of RHA-FA based geopolymer composites. International Journal for Scientific Research & Development, 3(4), ISSN (online): 2321-0613.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ramakrishnan, S., Velrajkumar, G., & Ranjith, S. (2014, January). Behavior of cement-rice husk ash concrete for pavement. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Development, 1(4), ISSN 2249-6149. http://www.rspublication.com/ijeted/ijeted_index.htm.
  25. 25.
    Mohamed Usman, M. K., & Senthil Pandian, M. (2014). Study on Fly Ash and Rice Husk Ash Based Geopolymer Concrete with Steel Fibre. Civil Engineering Systems and Sustainable Innovations, ISBN: 978-9383083-78-7.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    RidhoBayuaji, M. F., Nuruddin, S., Francis, J. J., Ekaputri, T., Triwulan, S., & Subaer, H. (2015). Fansuri, mechanical properties of MIRHA-Fly Ash geopolymer concrete. Materials Science Forum.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.803.49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kamau, J., Ahmed, A., & Ngong, K. (2018). Sulfate resistance of rice husk ash concrete. MATEC Web of Conferences 199, 02006.  https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201819902006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Venkatanarayanan, H. K., & Rangaraju, P. R. (2015). Effect of grinding of low-carbon rice husk ash on the microstructure and performance properties of blended cement concrete. Cement & Concrete Composite, 55, 348–363.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.09.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bashir, S., & Saharan, S. (2017). Resistance of geopolymer concrete against Sodium Sulfate (Na2SO4) Solution. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), 6(11). ISSN-2278-0181.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kim, Y. Y., Lee, B. J., Saraswathy, V., & Kwon, S. J. (2014). Strength and durability performance of alkali-activated rice husk ash geopolymer mortar. Scientific World Journal, 2014, Article ID 209584.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Saraswathy, V., & Song, H. W. (2007). Corrosion performance of rice husk ash blended concrete. Construction and Building Materials.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.05.037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringGCEKeonjharIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mining EngineeringGCEKeonjharIndia
  3. 3.Department of Civil EngineeringVSSUTSambalpurIndia
  4. 4.Environment & Sustainability DepartmentCSIR-IMMTBhubaneswarIndia

Personalised recommendations