Advertisement

Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Resolving the Issues and Challenges with Prosthetic Knees

  • Deepali SalwanEmail author
  • Shri Kant
  • G. Pandian
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1025)

Abstract

From the ancient times until today, in the age of Artificial Intelligence, field of prosthetics is where human is continuously striving to do better. Upper limb amputation deprives the person from routine activities, which the amputee never thought was important, on the other hand lower limb amputation restricts the person’s physical movements to a great extent. In this article we will highlight the issues and challenges with the active lower limb prosthetic from the socket to the knee, the material, the sensors and the algorithms used for controlling the movement. How each of them plays a pivotal role in providing a comfortable gait which resembles the natural human gait, this article throws light upon where are we in terms of advancement in lower limb prosthetic and the issues and challenges which are still there even with the finest active artificial knee available.

Keywords

Prosthetic-knee Artificial-knee Lower limb amputation Microprocessor prosthetic knee Sensors Classifier algorithm Sockets and liners 

References

  1. 1.
    Finch, J.L.: Assessment of two artificial big toe restorations from ancient Egypt and their significance to the history of prosthetics. J. Prosthet. Orthot. 24(4), 181–191 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hafner, B.J.: Evaluation of function, performance, and preference as transfemoral amputees transition from mechanical to microprocessor control of the prosthetic knee. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 88(2), 207–217 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Khadi, F.M.: Design and manufacturing knee joint for smart transfemoral prosthetic. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 454, 012078 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kishore Kumar, P., Subramani, K.: Trends and challenges in lower limb prosthesis. IEEE Potentials 36(1), 19–23 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Krut, S.: Secure microprocessor-controlled prosthetic leg for elderly amputees: preliminary results. Appl. Bionics Biomech. 8(3–4), 385–398 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Awad, M., Abouhussein, A.: Towards a smart semi-active prosthetic leg: preliminary assessment and testing. IFAC-Pap. Online 49(21), 170–176 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Karimi, G., Jahanian, O.: Genetic algorithm application in swing phase optimization of AK prosthesis with passive dynamics and biomechanics considerations. IntechOpen (2012).  https://doi.org/10.5772/38211Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alzaydi, A.A., Cheung, A.: Active prosthetic knee fuzzy logic - PID motion control, sensors and test platform design. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 2(5), 1–17 (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Arzen, K.-E.: A simple event-based PID controller. In: IFAC World Congress (1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fessler, J.: Space-alternating generalized expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 42(10), 2664–2666 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nandi, G.: Biologically inspired CPG based above knee active prosthesis. In: International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1–6. IEEE (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Frank, C.S.: Design and control of an active electrical knee and ankle prosthesis (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1109/BIOROB.2008.4762811
  13. 13.
    Frank, S., Bohara, A.: Design and control of a powered transfemoral prosthesis. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 263–273 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Herr, H., Wilkenfeld, A.: User-adaptive control of a magnetorheological prosthetic knee. Ind. Robot. 30(1), 42–55 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hogan, N.: Impedance control: an approach to manipulation. In: American Control Conference. IEEE (1984)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pt. Deen Dayal Upadhyaya National Institute for Persons with Physical DisabilitiesNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Research and Technology Development Center, Department of Computer Science, School of Engineering and TechnologySharda UniversityGreater NoidaIndia

Personalised recommendations