Advertisement

Function-Structure Collaborative Mapping Induced by Universal Triple I Systems

  • Yiming TangEmail author
  • Jingjing Chen
  • Fuji Ren
  • Xi Wu
  • Guangqing Bao
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1042)

Abstract

The and/or/not function tree is one of the principal functional models of product concept design. How to model and solve the and/or/not function tree is a key issue in this field. In the past, it was mainly to establish a function tree by artificial means, and it was hard to get the desired effect. Aiming at this problem, a novel function tree modeling method is proposed based on the idea of fuzzy reasoning. Firstly, the function tree is extended to the scope of the fuzzy function tree. Secondly, starting from the universal triple I algorithm of fuzzy reasoning, the fuzzy system for fuzzy function tree modeling is constructed, which is infiltrated into the function-structure mapping of function tree modeling. Therefore, the function-structure collaborative mapping method based on the triple I system is proposed. Through the application examples of the magnetic levitation train, the effectiveness of the proposed method is confirmed, and the problem of function tree modeling is effectively solved, which promotes the development of product concept design.

Keywords

Product conceptual design Collaboration Fuzzy reasoning Function tree 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61673156, 61672202, 61432004, U1613217, 61877016).

References

  1. 1.
    Shai, O., Reich, Y., Rubin, D.: Creative conceptual design: extending the scope by infused design. Comput. Aided Des. 41(3), 117–135 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chakrabarti, A., Bligh, T.P.: A scheme for functional reasoning in conceptual design. Des. Stud. 22(6), 493–517 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hsu, W., Woon, I.M.Y.: Current research in the conceptual design of mechanical products. Comput. Aided Des. 30(5), 377–389 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tang, Y.M., Liu, X.P.: Task partition for function tree according to innovative functional reasoning. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, Xian, pp. 189–195 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhu, L., Zhu, R., Liu, S.: Product information model for integrating axiomatic design with DFA. J. Comput.-Aided Des. Comput. Graph. 16(2), 216–221 (2004)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang, S., Feng, P., Pan, S.X., et al.: Study on automatic conceptual design strategy based on cyclic mapping model. J. Comput.-Aided Des. Comput. Graph. 17(3), 491–497 (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu, X., Liu, J., Tang, Y.: A contrast similarity function-tree’s extension method based on extension theory. J. Eng. Graph. 30(1), 153–159 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tang, Y., Liu, X.: EFVM solving algorithm of function trees. J. Comput.-Aided Des. Comput. Graph. 22(9), 1578–1586 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tang, Y., Liu, X.: A function family solving method of And/Or/Not function tree. J. Eng. Graph. 32(1), 143–147 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tang, Y., Liu, X.: Lossless simplifying strategies of And/Or/Not function tree. J. Graph. 34(1), 31–40 (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hua, D., Liu, X., Tang, Y.: FFM function-solving and its application in control system for sensor. J. Electron. Meas. Instrum. 30(6), 975–981 (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gan, Y.: Research on mechanical product innovation design for human-machine collaboration. China Plant Eng. 8, 107–108 (2019)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Duan, T., Huang, Y., Wang, Y.: Research on module partition for reconfiguration in software radio. Electron. Des. Eng. 27(9), 92–99 (2019)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex systems and decision processes. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 3(1), 28–44 (1973)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang, G.: On the logic foundation of fuzzy reasoning. Inf. Sci. 117(1), 47–88 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tang, Y., Liu, X.: Differently implicational universal triple I method of (1, 2, 2) type. Comput. Math. Appl. 59(6), 1965–1984 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tang, Y., Ren, F.: Fuzzy systems based on universal triple I method and their response functions. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Making 16(2), 443–471 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tang, Y., Pedrycz, W.: On continuity of the entropy-based differently implicational algorithm. Kybernetika 55(2), 307–336 (2019)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang, L.X.: A Course in Fuzzy Systems and Control. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1997)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tang, Y., Pedrycz, W.: On the α(u, v)-symmetric implicational method for R- and (S, N)-implications. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 92, 212–231 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yiming Tang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jingjing Chen
    • 1
  • Fuji Ren
    • 1
  • Xi Wu
    • 1
  • Guangqing Bao
    • 1
  1. 1.Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Affective Computing and Advanced Intelligent Machine, School of Computer and InformationHefei University of TechnologyHefeiChina

Personalised recommendations