Advertisement

Optimized Twin Support Vector Clustering in Transmission Electron Microscope of Cobalt Nanoparticles

  • Atrab A. Abd El-AzizEmail author
  • Heba Al ShaterEmail author
  • A. Dakhlaoui
  • Aboul Ella HassanienEmail author
  • Deepak Gupta
Conference paper
  • 50 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1087)

Abstract

Twin support vector clustering (TWSVC) algorithm has attracted a growing focus in recent years. In this paper, an enhanced TWSVC algorithm is proposed by using particle swarm optimization (PSO) for obtaining k-cluster planes and assigning each data sample to a correct cluster. This enhanced algorithm basically uses TWSVC to refine the clusters formed by PSO. The hybrid PSO-TWSVC algorithm is evaluated on a collected cobalt dataset in the nanotechnology field and then tested on four public datasets. The experiments of hybrid PSO-TWSVC with the classical K-means and TWSVC algorithms have proved that the hybrid PSO-TWSVC clustering algorithm has obvious advantages on accuracy.

Keywords

Particle swarm optimization Twin SVC Nanotechnology Cobalt TEM 

References

  1. 1.
    K.D. Sattler, in Handbook of Nanophysics, Principles, and Methods (CRC press, New York, 2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. Naga Padma, S.T. Banu, S.C. Kumari, Annual research & review in biology. Article no. ARRB.38894. 23(1), 1–10 (2018)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.E. Hutchison, Greener nanoscience: A proactive approach to advancing applications and reducing implications of nanotechnology. ACS Nano. 2(3), 395–402 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Neogy, R.T. Tewari, D. Srivastava, G.K. Dey, Transmission electron microscopy of nanomaterials. Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys. 44, 119–124 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J.Z. Zhang, Z.L. Wang, J. Liu, S. Chen, G.-Y. Liu, in Self-Assembled Nanostructures Nanoscale, Science and Technology, vol. 2 (Kluwer Academic, Plenum Publishers, New York, 2003), p. 316Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. Kim, C. Lee, S. Joo, K. Lee, Kinetics of gold nanoparticle aggregation: Experiments and modeling. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2(318), 238–243 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    L.F. Pease, D.-H. Tsai, J.L. Hertz, R.A. Zangmeister, M.R. Zachariah, M.J. Tarlov, Packing and size determination of colloidal nanoclusters. Langmuir ACS J. Surf. Colloids 26(13), 11384–11390 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Garza-Fabre, J. Handl, J. Knowles, An improved and more scalable evolutionary approach to multiobjective clustering. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 22(4), 515–535 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    C.R. Henry, Morphology of supported nanoparticles. Prog. Surf. Sci. 80(3–4), 92–116 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ş. Onur et al., Information-theoretic feature selection with discrete k-median clustering. Ann. Oper. Res. 263(1–2), 93–118 (2018)‏Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Z. Yang, Y. Guo, C. Li, Y. Shao, Local k-proximal plane clustering. Neural Comput. Appl. 26(1), 199–211 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Z. Wang et al., Twin support vector machine for clustering. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 26(10), 2583–2588 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Z. Wang et al., Ramp-based twin support vector clustering. arXiv preprint, vol. 1, pp. 1812–03710 (2018)‏Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Kennedy, Particle swarm optimization. Encyclopedia of Machine Learning (Springer, Boston, MA, 2011), pp. 760–766Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Singh et al., Application of PSO clustering for selection of chemical interface materials for sensor array electronic nose. Soft Computing: Theories and Applications, vol. 583 (Springer, Singapore, 2017), pp. 449–456Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    D. Amel et al., Controlled elaboration and magnetic properties of submicrometric cobalt fibers. J. Phys. Chem. C 112(37), 14348–14354 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    A.D. Omrani, M.A. Bousnina, L.S. Smiri, M. Taibi, P. Leone, F. Schoenstein, N. Jouini, Elaboration of nickel nanoparticles by modified polyol process and their spark plasma sintering, characterization and magnetic properties of the nanoparticles and the dense nano-structured material. Mater. Chem. Phys. 123(2–3), 821–828 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    D. Piotr, C. Lawrence Zitnick, Fast edge detection using structured forests. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 37(8), 1558–1570 (2015)‏CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    K. Fukunaga, Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition, 2nd edn. (Academic, New York, 1990)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Petronas Universiti, Mean and standard deviation features of color histogram using laplacian filter for content-based image retrieval. J. Theor. Appl. Inform. Technol. 34(1), pp. 1–7 (2011)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    ‏A.M. Nickfarjam, H. Ebrahimpour-Komleh, Multi-resolution gray-level image enhancement using particle swarm optimization. Appl. Intell. 47(4), 1132–1143 (2017)‏CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. Mathur, G. Foody, Multiclass and binary SVM classification: Implications for training and classification users. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 5(2), 241–245 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    S. Raschka, An overview of general performance metrics of binary classifier systems. arXiv preprint, vol. 1, pp. 1410.5330 (2014)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    C.L. Blake, C.J. Merz, UCI Repository for machine learning databases (The University of California, Department of Information and Computer Sciences). http://www.ics.uci.edu/mlearn/MLRepository.html (1998)

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.FCIKafrelSheikh UniversityKafr El-SheikhEgypt
  2. 2.Forensic and Clinical Toxicology DepartmentEl Menoufia University HospitalAl MinufyaEgypt
  3. 3.Département de ChimieFaculté Des Sciences de BizerteJarzounaTunisia
  4. 4.Faculty of Computers and InformationCairo UniversityGizaEgypt
  5. 5.Maharaja Agrasen Institute of TechnologyDelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations