Advertisement

Is Knowledge Acquired by Thinking or Doing?

  • Priyan DiasEmail author
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology book series (BRIEFSAPPLSCIENCES)

Abstract

Some aspects of Martin Heidegger’s philosophy resonate strongly with an engineering outlook. He argued that practice was more ‘primordial’ than theory, though preserving an important role for theoretical understanding as well, thus speaking to the gap between engineering education (highly theoretical) and engineering practice (mostly empirical). He also underlined the reality of ‘average’ practices into which we are socialized, though affirming the potential for original work and action too, thus providing the grounds for self-actualization whether within the routine or in transcending it. His notion of ‘thrownness’ emphasizes the importance of context, with which engineers are constantly engaged. While all this relates to the idea of our ‘being’, Heidegger also dealt with the influence of time on our practices. Future death could be seen as spurring innovation, cultural history as a source for critiquing current practice, and the present ‘situation’ as the immediate context for corrective or opportunistic action.

Keywords

Practice ‘Everydayness’ Breakdowns Context Temporality Authenticity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Adapted by permission from Springer Nature Customer Service Centre GmbH: Springer Nature: Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(3), 523–532: Heidegger’s resonance with engineering: the primacy of practice, by W. P. S. Dias, 2006.

References

  1. Aristotle, in Nicomachean Ethics, ed. by R. Crisp (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000)Google Scholar
  2. D.I. Blockley, Engineering from reflective practice. Res. Eng. Des. 4, 13–22 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. T.H. Broome, J. Peirce, The heroic engineer. J. Eng. Educ. 86(1), 51–55 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. M. Davis, Thinking Like an Engineer: Studies in the Ethics of a Profession (Oxford University Press, New York, 1998)Google Scholar
  5. W.P.S. Dias, Sensitivity and substitutability in concrete construction. Asia Pac. Build. Constr. Manag. J. 2(2), 32–34 (1997)Google Scholar
  6. W.P.S. Dias, Heidegger’s resonance with engineering: the primacy of practice. Sci. Eng. Ethics 12(3), 523–532 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. W.P.S. Dias, Pompeii by Robert Harris: an engineering reading. ICE Proc. Eng. Hist. Herit. 163(4), 255–260 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. P. Dias, The disciplines of engineering and history: some common ground. Sci. Eng. Ethics 20(2), 539–549 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. W.P.S. Dias, D.I. Blockley, Reflective practice in engineering design. ICE Proc. Civ. Eng. 108(4), 160–168 (1995)Google Scholar
  10. H.L. Dreyfus, Husserl, Heidegger and modern existentialism, in Great Philosophers: An Introduction to Western Philosophy, ed. by B. Magee (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1988), pp. 252–277Google Scholar
  11. H.L. Dreyfus, Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s “Being and Time, Division I” (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1991)Google Scholar
  12. S.C. Florman, The Existential Pleasures of Engineering, 2nd edn. (St. Martin’s Press, New York, 1994)Google Scholar
  13. R. Harris, Pompeii (Arrow Books, London, 2004)Google Scholar
  14. M. Heidegger, Being and Time (trans: J. Macquarrie, E. Robinson) (SCM Press, London, 1962)Google Scholar
  15. M. Heidegger, Poetry, Language, Thought (trans: A. Hofstader) (Harper & Row, New York, 1971)Google Scholar
  16. M. Heidegger, The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays (trans: W. Lovitt) (Harper & Row, New York, 1977)Google Scholar
  17. M. Heidegger, Being and Time (trans: J. Stambaugh) (SUNY Press, Albany, 1997)Google Scholar
  18. L.A. Hickman, John Dewey’s Pragmatic Technology (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1990)Google Scholar
  19. C.P. Long, The ontological reappropriation of phronesis. Cont. Philos. Rev. 35, 35–60 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. P. Nuttgens, What Should We Teach and How Should We Teach It?: Aims and Purpose of Higher Education (Gower Publishing Company, London, 1988)Google Scholar
  21. M. Polanyi, Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-critical Philosophy (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1958)Google Scholar
  22. M. Polanyi, The Tacit Dimension (Doubleday & Co., Garden City, 1966)Google Scholar
  23. D.A. Schon, The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action (Temple Smith, London, 1983)Google Scholar
  24. A. Snodgrass, R. Coyne, Models, metaphors and the hermeneutics of designing. Des. Issues 9(1), 56–74 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Z. Turk, On theoretical backgrounds of CAD, in Artificial Intelligence in Structural Engineering, ed. by I. Smith (Springer, Berlin, 1998), pp. 490–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Z. Turk, Phenomenological foundations of conceptual product modeling in AEC. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Eng. 15, 83–92 (2001a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Z. Turk, Multimedia: providing students with real world experiences. Autom. Constr. 10(2), 247–255 (2001b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. B.A. Turner, N. Pidgeon, Man-Made Disasters, 2nd edn. (Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, 1997)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of MoratuwaMoratuwaSri Lanka

Personalised recommendations