Advertisement

Creativity, Linguistics, and the Skinner–Chomsky Controversy

  • Feifei Zhou
Chapter
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

In Keywords, Raymond Williams makes a distinction between an older and a modern definition of the word ‘create’. Before the onset of Humanism in the Renaissance period, this word was related to ‘the sense of something having been made, and thus to a past event’ and mainly used ‘in the precise context of the original divine creation of the world: creation itself, and creature, have the same root stem’ (Williams, 1976/1983, p. 82). He points out that it was not until the sixteenth century that human creation in the form of poetic imagination became part of the meaning, as exemplified by the sixteenth-century Italian poet Torquato Tasso’s statement: ‘There are two creators, God and the poet’. In fact the word ‘creative’ was coined in the eighteenth century and denotes ‘a faculty’ which is associated with art and thought (Williams, 1976/1983, p. 83). This shift from certain divine influences to the human faculty has also much to do with the general movement of Romanticism in that same century which gives rise to ideas such as self-expression, group-belonging (romantic nationalism), the aesthetics of mundane ordinary life, indeterminacy and unpredictability of human existence.

References

  1. Aarsleff, H. (1970). The history of linguistics and Professor Chomsky. Language, 46(3), 570–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andresen, J. (1991). Skinner and Chomsky 30 years later. Or: The return of the repressed. The Behavior Analyst, 14(1), 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruner, J. (1983). Child’s talk: Learning to use language. New York: W.W. Norton & Co..Google Scholar
  4. Carter, R. (2004). Language and creativity: The art of common talk. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Chomsky, N. (1980). Review of skinner. In N. Block (Ed.), Readings in philosophy of psychology (Vol. I, pp. 48–66). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1959).Google Scholar
  6. Chomsky, N. (1962). The logical basis of linguistic theory (pp. 509–574). In Preprints of papers from the 9th International congress of linguists. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  7. Chomsky, N. (1964a). Current issues in linguistic theory. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  8. Chomsky, N. (1964b). The logical basis of linguistic theory. In H. Lunt (Ed.), Proceedings of the 9th international congress of linguists (pp. 914–978). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  9. Chomsky, N. (1964c). The logical basis of linguistic theory. In J. A. Fodor & J. J. Katz (Eds.), The structure of language: Readings in the philosophy of language (pp. 211–245). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  10. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Chomsky, N. (2009). Cartesian linguistics: A chapter in the history of rationalist thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1966).Google Scholar
  12. Chomsky, N. (1973). Psychology and ideology. Cognition, 1, 11–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Joseph, J. (2003). Rethinking linguistic creativity. In H. Davis & T. J. Taylor (Eds.), Rethinking linguistics (pp. 121–150). London: Routledge Curzon.Google Scholar
  14. Joseph, J. (2010). Chomsky’s atavistic revolution (with a little help from his enemies). In D. A. Kibbee (Ed.), Chomskyan (R)evolutions (pp. 1–18). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  15. Koerner, E. F. K. (2004). Essays in the history of linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Pub.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lakoff, G. (1973, February 8). Deep language. The New York review of books, 20(1).Google Scholar
  17. MacCorquodale, K. (1970). On Chomsky’s review of skinner’s verbal behavior. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13(1), 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McGilvray, J. A. (2009). Introduction. In N. Chomsky (Ed.), Cartesian linguistics: A chapter in the history of rationalist thought (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1966).Google Scholar
  19. Palmer, D. C. (2006). On Chomsky’s appraisal of Skinner’s Verbal Behavior: A half century of misunderstanding. The Behavior Analyst, 29(2), 253–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pope, R. (2005). Creativity: Theory, history, practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Sampson, G. (1979). Liberty and language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Searle, J. R. (1972). Chomsky’s revolution in linguistics. The New York review of books, 18(12), 16–24.Google Scholar
  23. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Williams, R. (1983). Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society. New York: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1976).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Feifei Zhou
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EnglishLingnan UniversityHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations