Pragmatics: Order in Speech Acts

  • Feifei Zhou


Similar to ethnomethodology (and CA), the pragmatic tradition in the philosophy of language and linguistics, especially SAT, also seeks to study the ‘order’ instead of formalistic representations of the language system in language use. In this chapter, I will examine how order is represented in the pragmatic tradition.


  1. Austin, J. L. (1956–1957). A plea for excuses: The presidential address. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, 57, 1–30.Google Scholar
  2. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cavell, S. (1999). The claim of reason: Wittgenstein, skepticism, morality, and tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1979).Google Scholar
  5. Garfinkel, H. (1996). Ethnomethodology’s program. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(1), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gregg, B. (1999). Using legal rules in an indeterminate world: Overcoming the limitations of jurisprudence. Political Theory, 27(3), 357–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hutton, C. (2009). Language, meaning and the law. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Strawson, P. F. (1964). Intention and convention in speech acts. The Philosophical Review, 73(4), 439–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Feifei Zhou
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EnglishLingnan UniversityHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations