Advertisement

Development of Biomass-Derived Cellulose Nanocrystals and its Composites

  • Kona Mondal
  • Neha Mulchandani
  • Somashree Mondal
  • Vimal KatiyarEmail author
Chapter
  • 50 Downloads
Part of the Materials Horizons: From Nature to Nanomaterials book series (MHFNN)

Abstract

Cellulose nanocrystals are the most fascinating smart bio-based nanomaterials derived from the most abundant and inexhaustible, naturally occurring biopolymer “cellulose.” These nanomaterials have received a tremendous amount of interest in both industry and scientific research due to their unique structural and physicochemical properties including mechanical, optical, chemical, and rheological along with bio-compatibility, biodegradability, renewability, low density, and adaptable surface chemistry. However, few challenges are addressed due to the hydrophilic nature of these nanocrystals while acting as reinforcing agent for developing composite films. The surface modification or functionalization of these nanomaterials is one such strategy to meet the various challenging demands such as the development of high-performance nanocomposites, using hydrophobic polymer matrices. Considering the increasing potential of this sustainable bio-nanomaterial, the current chapter aims to collate the knowledge about the various biomass-based sources, the details of synthesis techniques, and wide applications along with the compatibility of sustainable polymers of cellulose nanocrystals. Further, the details about the various characteristic properties of these bio-nanomaterials and its composites are discussed along with their potential in wide range of applications.

Keywords

Bio-nanomaterials Sustainable Biodegradability Composites 

References

  1. 1.
    Mishra RK, Ha SK, Verma K, Tiwari SK (2018) Recent progress in selected bio-nanomaterials and their engineering applications: an overview. J Sci Adv Mater Devices 3:263–288.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsamd.2018.05.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Owusu PA, Asumadu-Sarkodie S (2016) A review of renewable energy sources, sustainability issues and climate change mitigation. Cogent Eng 3:1167990.  https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2016.1167990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lagerwall JPF, Schütz C, Salajkova M, Noh J, Hyun Park J, Scalia G, Bergström L (2014) Cellulose nanocrystal-based materials: from liquid crystal self-assembly and glass formation to multifunctional thin films. NPG Asia Mater 6:e80.  https://doi.org/10.1038/am.2013.69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lin N, Huang J, Dufresne A (2012) Preparation, properties and applications of polysaccharide nanocrystals in advanced functional nanomaterials: a review. Nanoscale 4:3274–3294.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c2nr30260hCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sturcová A, His I, Apperley DC, Sugiyama J, Jarvis MC (2004) Structural details of crystalline cellulose from higher plants. Biomacromolecules 5:1333–1339.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm034517pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    O’Sullivan AC (1997) Cellulose: the structure slowly unravels. Cellulose 4:173–207.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1018431705579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nishiyama Y, Sugiyama J, Chanzy H, Langan P (2003) Crystal structure and hydrogen bonding system in cellulose Iα from synchrotron X-ray and neutron fiber diffraction. J Am Chem Soc 125:14300–14306.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja037055wCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nishiyama Y, Langan P, Chanzy H (2002) Crystal structure and hydrogen-bonding system in cellulose Iβ from synchrotron X-ray and neutron fiber diffraction. J Am Chem Soc 124:9074–9082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Langan P, Nishiyama Y, Chanzy H (2001) X-ray structure of mercerized cellulose II at 1 Å resolution. Biomacromolecules 2:410–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rowland SP, Howley PS (1988) Hydrogen bonding on accessible surfaces of cellulose from various sources and relationship to order within crystalline regions. J Polym Sci Part Polym Chem 26:1769–1778.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pola.1988.080260708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nickerson RF, Habrle JA (2002) Cellulose intercrystalline structure. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ie50455a024. Accessed 6 Apr 2019
  12. 12.
    Rånby BG (1951) Fibrous macromolecular systems. Cellulose and muscle. The colloidal properties of cellulose micelles. Discuss Faraday Soc 11:158–164.  https://doi.org/10.1039/df9511100158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ding S-Y, Himmel ME (2006) The maize primary cell wall microfibril: a new model derived from direct visualization. J Agric Food Chem 54:597–606.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf051851zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Malcolm Brown R, Saxena IM, Kudlicka K (1996) Cellulose biosynthesis in higher plants. Trends Plant Sci 1:149–156.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1360-1385(96)80050-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mellerowicz EJ, Baucher M, Sundberg B, Boerjan W (2001) Unravelling cell wall formation in the woody dicot stem. Plant Mol Biol 47:239–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Beck-Candanedo S, Roman M, Gray DG (2005) Effect of reaction conditions on the properties and behavior of wood cellulose nanocrystal suspensions. Biomacromolecules 6:1048–1054.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm049300pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    de Rodriguez NLG, Thielemans W, Dufresne A (2006) Sisal cellulose whiskers reinforced polyvinyl acetate nanocomposites. Cellulose 13(3):261–270  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-005-9039-7
  18. 18.
    Kimura F, Kimura T, Tamura M, Hirai A, Ikuno M, Horii F (2005) Magnetic alignment of the chiral nematic phase of a cellulose microfibril suspension. Langmuir ACS J Surf Colloids 21:2034–2037.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la0475728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Revol J-F (1982) On the cross-sectional shape of cellulose crystallites in Valonia ventricosa. Carbohydr Polym 2:123–134.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8617(82)90058-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    George J, Bawa A, Hatna S (2010) Synthesis and characterization of bacterial cellulose nanocrystals and their PVA nanocomposites. Adv Mater Res 123:383–386.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.123-125.383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Junior de Menezes A, Siqueira G, Curvelo AAS, Dufresne A (2009) Extrusion and characterization of functionalized cellulose whiskers reinforced polyethylene nanocomposites. Polymer 50:4552–4563.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2009.07.038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Araki J, Wada M, Kuga S (2000) Steric stabilization of a cellulose microcrystal suspension by poly(ethylene glycol) grafting. Langmuir 17:21–27.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la001070mCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    George J, Siddaramaiah (2012) High performance edible nanocomposite films containing bacterial cellulose nanocrystals. Carbohydr PolymGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jawaid M, Mohammad F (2017) Nanocellulose and nanohydrogel matrices: biotechnological and biomedical applications. WileyGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dufresne A (2013) Nanocellulose: a new ageless bionanomaterial. Mater Today 16:220–227.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2013.06.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sekhar Purkait B, Ray D, Sengupta S, Kar T, Mohanty A, Misra M (2010) Isolation of cellulose nanoparticles from sesame husk. Ind Eng Chem Res 50.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie101797d
  27. 27.
    de Oliveira FB, Bras J, Pimenta MTB, Curvelo AA da S, Belgacem MN (2016) Production of cellulose nanocrystals from sugarcane bagasse fibers and pith. Ind Crops Prod 93:48–57.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.04.064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kumar A, Negi YS, Choudhary V, Bhardwaj NK (2014) Characterization of cellulose nanocrystals produced by acid-hydrolysis from sugarcane bagasse as agro-waste. J Mater Phys Chem 2:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.12691/jmpc-2-1-1
  29. 29.
    Bano S, Negi YS (2017) Studies on cellulose nanocrystals isolated from groundnut shells. Carbohydr Polym 157:1041–1049.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.10.069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Oun AA, Rhim J-W (2016) Isolation of cellulose nanocrystals from grain straws and their use for the preparation of carboxymethyl cellulose-based nanocomposite films. Carbohydr Polym 150:187–200.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.05.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kasyapi N, Chaudhary V, Bhowmick A (2013) Bionanowhiskers from jute: preparation and characterization. Carbohydr Polym 92:1116–1123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.10.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chen W, Yu H, Liu Y (2011) Preparation of millimeter-long cellulose I nanofibers with diameters of 30–80 nm from bamboo fibers. Carbohydr Polym 86:453–461.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.04.061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    do Nascimento DM, Dias AF, de Araújo Junior CP, de Freitas Rosa M, Morais JPS, de Figueirêdo MCB (2016) A comprehensive approach for obtaining cellulose nanocrystal from coconut fiber. Part II: environmental assessment of technological pathways. Ind Crops Prod 93:58–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.02.063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kim HM, Wi SG, Jung S, Song Y, Bae H-J (2015) Efficient approach for bioethanol production from red seaweed Gelidium amansii. Bioresour Technol 175:128–134.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chen YW, Lee HV, Juan JC, Phang S-M (2016) Production of new cellulose nanomaterial from red algae marine biomass Gelidium elegans. Carbohydr Polym 151:1210–1219.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.06.083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mihranyan A (2011) Cellulose from cladophorales green algae: from environmental problem to high-tech composite materials. J Appl Polym Sci 119:2449–2460.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.32959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    George J, Sabapathi S (2015) Cellulose nanocrystals: synthesis, functional properties, and applications. Nanotechnol Sci Appl 8:45–54.  https://doi.org/10.2147/nsa.s64386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gowen RJ, Bradbury NB, Brown JR (1989) The use of simple models in assessing two of the interactions between fish farming and the marine environmentGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    George J, Ramana KV, Sabapathy SN, Bawa AS (2005) Physico-mechanical properties of chemically treated bacterial (Acetobacter xylinum) cellulose membrane. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 21:1323–1327.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-005-3574-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    do Nascimento JHO, Luz RF, Galvão FMF, Melo JDD, Oliveira FR, Ladchumananandasivam R, Zille A (2015) Extraction and characterization of cellulosic nanowhisker obtained from discarded cotton fibers. Mater Today Proc 2:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2015.04.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lamaming J, Hashim R, Sulaiman O, Peng LC, Sugimoto T, Nordin N (2015) Cellulose nanocrystals isolated from oil palm trunk. Carbohydr Polym 127.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.03.043
  42. 42.
    Ooi SY, Ahmad I, Amin MCIM (2016) Cellulose nanocrystals extracted from rice husks as a reinforcing material in gelatin hydrogels for use in controlled drug delivery systems. Ind Crops Prod 93:227–234.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.11.082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    George J, Ramana KV, Sabapathy SN, Jagannath JH, Bawa AS (2005) Characterization of chemically treated bacterial (Acetobacter xylinum) biopolymer: some thermo-mechanical properties. Int J Biol Macromol 37:189–194.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2005.10.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Jonoobi M, Oladi R, Davoudpour Y, Oksman K, Dufresne A, Hamzeh Y, Davoodi R (2015) Different preparation methods and properties of nanostructured cellulose from various natural resources and residues: a review. Cellulose 22:935–969.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0551-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S, Lindström T, Ankerfors M, Gray D, Dorris A (2011) Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:5438–5466.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201001273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Vasconcelos NF, Feitosa JPA, da Gama FMP, Morais JPS, Andrade FK, de Souza Filho MDSM, de Freitas Rosa M (2017) Bacterial cellulose nanocrystals produced under different hydrolysis conditions: properties and morphological features. Carbohydr Polym 155:425–431.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.08.090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Camarero Espinosa S, Kuhnt T, Foster EJ, Weder C (2013) Isolation of thermally stable cellulose nanocrystals by phosphoric acid hydrolysis. Biomacromolecules 14:1223–1230.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm400219uCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lemke CH, Dong RY, Michal CA, Hamad WY (2012) New insights into nano-crystalline cellulose structure and morphology based on solid-state NMR. Cellulose 19:1619–1629.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9759-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Granja PL, Pouységu L, Deffieux D, Daudé G, Jéso BD, Labrugère C, Baquey C, Barbosa MA (2001) Cellulose phosphates as biomaterials. II. Surface chemical modification of regenerated cellulose hydrogels. J Appl Polym Sci 82:3354–3365.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.2194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Leung ACW, Hrapovic S, Lam E, Liu Y, Male KB, Mahmoud KA, Luong JHT (2011) Characteristics and properties of carboxylated cellulose nanocrystals prepared from a novel one-step procedure. Small 7:302–305.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201001715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Geboers J, de Vyver SV, Carpentier K, Jacobs P, Sels B (2011) Efficient hydrolytic hydrogenation of cellulose in the presence of Ru-loaded zeolites and trace amounts of mineral acid. Chem Commun 47:5590–5592.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C1CC10422ECrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Tang L, Huang B, Ou W, Chen X, Chen Y (2011) Manufacture of cellulose nanocrystals by cation exchange resin-catalyzed hydrolysis of cellulose. Bioresour Technol 102:10973–10977.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.09.070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Liu Y, Wang H, Yu G, Yu Q, Li B, Mu X (2014) A novel approach for the preparation of nanocrystalline cellulose by using phosphotungstic acid. Carbohydr Polym 110:415–422.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.04.040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Du H, Liu C, Mu X, Gong W, Lv D, Hong Y, Si C, Li B (2016) Preparation and characterization of thermally stable cellulose nanocrystals via a sustainable approach of FeCl3-catalyzed formic acid hydrolysis. Cellulose 23:2389–2407.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0963-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Yu H-Y, Zhang D-Z, Lu F-F, Yao J (2016) New approach for single-step extraction of carboxylated cellulose nanocrystals for their use as adsorbents and flocculants. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 4:2632–2643.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Tang Y, Shen X, Zhang J, Guo D, Kong F, Zhang N (2015) Extraction of cellulose nano-crystals from old corrugated container fiber using phosphoric acid and enzymatic hydrolysis followed by sonication. Carbohydr Polym 125:360–366.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.02.063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Kontturi E, Meriluoto A, Penttilä PA, Baccile N, Malho J-M, Potthast A, Rosenau T, Ruokolainen J, Serimaa R, Laine J, Sixta H (2016) Degradation and crystallization of cellulose in hydrogen chloride vapor for high-yield isolation of cellulose nanocrystals. Angew Chem Int Ed 55:14455–14458.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201606626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Chen L, Zhu JY, Baez C, Kitin P, Elder T (2016) Highly thermal-stable and functional cellulose nanocrystals and nanofibrils produced using fully recyclable organic acids. Green Chem 18:3835–3843.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c6gc00687fCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Yang B, Dai Z, Ding S-Y, Wyman CE (2011) Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic biomass. Biofuels 2:421–449.  https://doi.org/10.4155/bfs.11.116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Li Y, Liu Y, Chen W, Wang Q, Liu Y, Li J, Yu H (2016) Facile extraction of cellulose nanocrystals from wood using ethanol and peroxide solvothermal pretreatment followed by ultrasonic nanofibrillation. Green Chem 18:1010–1018.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5GC02576ACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Rabinovich ML, Melnick MS, Bolobova AV (2002) The structure and mechanism of action of cellulolytic enzymes. Biochem Mosc 67:850–871.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019958419032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Grimm FA, Iwata Y, Sirenko O, Chappell GA, Wright FA, Reif DM, Braisted J, Gerhold DL, Yeakley JM, Shepard P, Seligmann B, Roy T, Boogaard PJ, Ketelslegers HB, Rohde AM, Rusyn I (2016) A chemical–biological similarity-based grouping of complex substances as a prototype approach for evaluating chemical alternatives. Green Chem 18:4407–4419.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c6gc01147kCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    George J, Ramana KV, Bawa AS, Siddaramaiah (2011) Bacterial cellulose nanocrystals exhibiting high thermal stability and their polymer nanocomposites. Int J Biol Macromol 48:50–57.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2010.09.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Satyamurthy P, Jain P, Balasubramanya RH, Vigneshwaran N (2011) Preparation and characterization of cellulose nanowhiskers from cotton fibres by controlled microbial hydrolysis. Carbohydr Polym 83:122–129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.07.029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Neumann J, Cho C-W, Steudte S, Köser J, Uerdingen M, Thöming J, Stolte S (2012) Biodegradability of fluoroorganic and cyano-based ionic liquid anions under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Green Chem 14:410–418.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C1GC16170ACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Chen X, Deng X, Shen W, Jiang L (2012) Controlled enzymolysis preparation of nanocrystalline cellulose from pretreated cotton fibers. BioResources 7:4237–4248.  https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.7.3.4237-4248
  67. 67.
    Xu Y, Salmi J, Kloser E, Perrin F, Grosse S, Denault J, Lau PCK (2013) Feasibility of nanocrystalline cellulose production by endoglucanase treatment of natural bast fibers. Ind Crops Prod 51:381–384.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.09.029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Hu Y, Catchmark JM (2011) Integration of cellulases into bacterial cellulose: toward bioabsorbable cellulose composites. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 97B:114–123.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Wang B, Lv X, Chen S, Li Z, Sun X, Feng C, Wang H, Xu Y (2016) In vitro biodegradability of bacterial cellulose by cellulase in simulated body fluid and compatibility in vivo. Cellulose 23:3187–3198.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0993-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Domingues AA, Pereira FV, Sierakowski MR, Rojas OJ, Petri DFS (2016) Interfacial properties of cellulose nanoparticles obtained from acid and enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Cellulose 23:2421–2437.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0965-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Pandey JK, Takagi H, Nakagaito AN, Kim H-J (2014) Handbook of polymer nanocomposites. Processing, performance and application: volume C: polymer nanocomposites of cellulose nanoparticles. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Amin KNM, Annamalai PK, Morrow IC, Martin D (2015) Production of cellulose nanocrystals via a scalable mechanical method. RSC Adv 5:57133–57140.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA06862BCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Abdul Khalil HPS, Bhat AH, Ireana Yusra AF (2012) Green composites from sustainable cellulose nanofibrils: a review. Carbohydr Polym 87:963–979.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Allen TC, Cuculo JA (1973) Cellulose derivatives containing carboxylic acid groups. J Polym Sci Macromol Rev 7:189–262.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1973.230070103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Li W, Yue J, Liu S (2012) Preparation of nanocrystalline cellulose via ultrasound and its reinforcement capability for poly(vinyl alcohol) composites. Ultrason Sonochem 19:479–485.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2011.11.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Zhao H, Feng X, Gao H (2007) Ultrasonic technique for extracting nanofibers from nature materials. Appl Phys Lett 90:073112. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2450666
  77. 77.
    Tischer PCS, Sierakowski MR, Westfahl Jr H, Tischer CA (2010) Nanostructural reorganization of bacterial cellulose by ultrasonic treatment. Biomacromolecules 11:1217–1224. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm901383a
  78. 78.
    Saito T, Isogai A (2006) Introduction of aldehyde groups on surfaces of native cellulose fibers by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Colloids Surf Physicochem Eng Asp 289:219–225.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.04.038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Man Z, Muhammad N, Sarwono A, Bustam MA, Vignesh Kumar M, Rafiq S (2011) Preparation of cellulose nanocrystals using an ionic liquid. J Polym Environ 19:726–731.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-011-0323-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Mao J, Osorio-Madrazo A, Laborie M-P (2013) Preparation of cellulose I nanowhiskers with a mildly acidic aqueous ionic liquid: reaction efficiency and whiskers attributes. Cellulose 20:1829–1840.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-9942-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Tan XY, Abd Hamid SB, Lai CW (2015) Preparation of high crystallinity cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) by ionic liquid solvolysis. Biomass Bioenergy 81:584–591.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.08.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Abushammala H, Krossing I, Laborie M-P (2015) Ionic liquid-mediated technology to produce cellulose nanocrystals directly from wood. Carbohydr Polym 134:609–616.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.07.079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Iskak NAM, Julkapli NM, Hamid SBA (2017) Understanding the effect of synthesis parameters on the catalytic ionic liquid hydrolysis process of cellulose nanocrystals. Cellulose 24:2469–2481.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1273-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Miao J, Yu Y, Jiang Z, Zhang L (2016) One-pot preparation of hydrophobic cellulose nanocrystals in an ionic liquid. Cellulose 23:1209–1219.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0864-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Evangelina Vallejos M, Dib Zambon M, Cristina Area M, da Silva Curvelo AA (2012) Low liquid–solid ratio (LSR) hot water pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse. Green Chem 14:1982–1989.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C2GC35397KCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Novo LP, Bras J, García A, Belgacem N, Curvelo AAS (2015) Subcritical water: a method for green production of cellulose nanocrystals. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 3:2839–2846.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Brinchi L, Cotana F, Fortunati E, Kenny JM (2013) Production of nanocrystalline cellulose from lignocellulosic biomass: technology and applications. Carbohydr Polym 94:154–169.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Tang Y, Yang S, Zhang N, Zhang J (2014) Preparation and characterization of nanocrystalline cellulose via low-intensity ultrasonic-assisted sulfuric acid hydrolysis. Cellulose 21:335–346.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0158-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Rohaizu R, Wanrosli WD (2017) Sono-assisted TEMPO oxidation of oil palm lignocellulosic biomass for isolation of nanocrystalline cellulose. Ultrason Sonochem 34:631–639.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.06.040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Beltramino F, Roncero MB, Torres AL, Vidal T, Valls C (2016) Optimization of sulfuric acid hydrolysis conditions for preparation of nanocrystalline cellulose from enzymatically pretreated fibers. Cellulose 23:1777–1789.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0897-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Lu Z, Fan L, Zheng H, Lu Q, Liao Y, Huang B (2013) Preparation, characterization and optimization of nanocellulose whiskers by simultaneously ultrasonic wave and microwave assisted. Bioresour Technol 146:82–88.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.07.047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Chowdhury ZZ, Hamid SBA (2016) Preparation and characterization of nanocrystalline cellulose using ultrasonication combined with a microwave-assisted pretreatment process. BioResources 11:3397–3415.  https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.11.2.3397-3415
  93. 93.
    Oun AA, Rhim J-W (2015) Effect of post-treatments and concentration of cotton linter cellulose nanocrystals on the properties of agar-based nanocomposite films. Carbohydr Polym 134:20–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.07.053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Hirai A, Inui O, Horii F, Tsuji M (2009) Phase separation behavior in aqueous suspensions of bacterial cellulose nanocrystals prepared by sulfuric acid treatment. Langmuir 25:497–502.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la802947mCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Han J, Zhou C, Wu Y, Liu F, Wu Q (2013) Self-assembling behavior of cellulose nanoparticles during freeze-drying: effect of suspension concentration, particle size, crystal structure, and surface charge. Biomacromolecules 14:1529–1540.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm4001734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Favier V, Dendievel R, Canova G, Cavaille JY, Gilormini P (1997) Simulation and modeling of three-dimensional percolating structures: case of a latex matrix reinforced by a network of cellulose fibers. Acta Mater 45:1557–1565.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(96)00264-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40:3941–3994.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C0CS00108BCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Šturcová A, Davies GR, Eichhorn SJ (2005) Elastic modulus and stress-transfer properties of tunicate cellulose whiskers. Biomacromolecules 6:1055–1061.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm049291kCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Muiruri JK, Liu S, Teo WS, Kong J, He C (2017) Highly biodegradable and tough polylactic acid-cellulose nanocrystal composite. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:3929–3937.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b03123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Muiruri JK, Liu S, Yeo JCC, Koh JJ, Kong J, Thitsartarn W, Teo WS, He C (2019) Synergistic toughening of poly(lactic acid)–cellulose nanocrystal composites through cooperative effect of cavitation and crazing deformation mechanisms. ACS Appl Polym Mater 1:509–518.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.8b00201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Jahan Z, Niazi MBK, Gregersen ØW (2018) Mechanical, thermal and swelling properties of cellulose nanocrystals/PVA nanocomposites membranes. J Ind Eng Chem 57:113–124.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.08.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Meesorn W, Shirole A, Vanhecke D, de Espinosa LM, Weder C (2017) A simple and versatile strategy to improve the mechanical properties of polymer nanocomposites with cellulose nanocrystals. Macromolecules 50:2364–2374.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.6b02629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Azizi Samir MAS, Alloin F, Sanchez J-Y, El Kissi N, Dufresne A (2004) Preparation of cellulose whiskers reinforced nanocomposites from an organic medium suspension. Macromolecules 37:1386–1393.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ma030532aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Cassagnau P (2013) Linear viscoelasticity and dynamics of suspensions and molten polymers filled with nanoparticles of different aspect ratios. Polymer 54:4762–4775.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2013.06.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Araki J, Wada M, Kuga S, Okano T (1999) Influence of surface charge on viscosity behavior of cellulose microcrystal suspension. J Wood Sci 45:258–261.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01177736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Peng B, Tang J, Wang P, Luo J, Xiao P, Lin Y, Tam KC (2018) Rheological properties of cellulose nanocrystal-polymeric systems. Cellulose 25:3229–3240.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1775-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Kamal MR, Khoshkava V (2015) Effect of cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) on rheological and mechanical properties and crystallization behavior of PLA/CNC nanocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 123:105–114.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.01.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Khandal D, Riedl B, Tavares JR, Carreau PJ, Heuzey M-C (2019) Tailoring cellulose nanocrystals rheological behavior in aqueous suspensions through surface functionalization with polyethyleneimine. Phys Fluids 31:021207.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5046669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Gupta A, Simmons W, Schueneman GT, Hylton D, Mintz EA (2017) Rheological and thermo-mechanical properties of poly(lactic acid)/lignin-coated cellulose nanocrystal composites. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:1711–1720.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Ben Azouz K, Ramires EC, Van den Fonteyne W, El Kissi N, Dufresne A (2012) Simple method for the melt extrusion of a cellulose nanocrystal reinforced hydrophobic polymer. ACS Macro Lett 1:236–240.  https://doi.org/10.1021/mz2001737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Eyley S, Thielemans W (2014) Surface modification of cellulose nanocrystals. Nanoscale 6:7764–7779.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4NR01756KCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Habibi Y, Lucia LA, Rojas OJ (2010) Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications. Chem Rev 110:3479–3500.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr900339wCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Salajková M, Berglund LA, Zhou Q (2012) Hydrophobic cellulose nanocrystals modified with quaternary ammonium salts. J Mater Chem 22:19798–19805.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C2JM34355JCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Abitbol T, Marway H, Cranston ED (2014) Surface modification of cellulose nanocrystals with cetyltrimethylammonium bromide. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 29:46–57.  https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2014-29-01-p046-057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Ansari F, Salajková M, Zhou Q, Berglund LA (2015) Strong surface treatment effects on reinforcement efficiency in biocomposites based on cellulose nanocrystals in poly(vinyl acetate) matrix. Biomacromolecules 16:3916–3924.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.5b01245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Abraham E, Nevo Y, Slattegard R, Attias N, Sharon S, Lapidot S, Shoseyov O (2016) Highly hydrophobic thermally stable liquid crystalline cellulosic nanomaterials. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 4:1338–1346.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b01363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Girouard NM, Xu S, Schueneman GT, Shofner ML, Meredith JC (2016) Site-selective modification of cellulose nanocrystals with isophorone diisocyanate and formation of polyurethane-CNC composites. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:1458–1467.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b10723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Fujisawa S, Togawa E, Kuroda K (2017) Nanocellulose-stabilized Pickering emulsions and their applications. Sci Technol Adv Mater 18:959–971.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14686996.2017.1401423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Siqueira G, Bras J, Dufresne A (2010) New process of chemical grafting of cellulose nanoparticles with a long chain isocyanate. Langmuir 26:402–411.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la9028595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Dhar P, Kumar A, Katiyar V (2016) Magnetic cellulose nanocrystal based anisotropic polylactic acid nanocomposite films: influence on electrical, magnetic, thermal, and mechanical properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:18393–18409.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b02828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Hu Z, Berry RM, Pelton R, Cranston ED (2017) One-pot water-based hydrophobic surface modification of cellulose nanocrystals using plant polyphenols. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:5018–5026.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00415CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kona Mondal
    • 1
  • Neha Mulchandani
    • 1
  • Somashree Mondal
    • 1
  • Vimal Katiyar
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology GuwahatiKamrupIndia

Personalised recommendations