Advertisement

The Formation and Effect of Affect in Knowledge Intensive Team: A Dynamic Computational Model

  • Xin Yue
  • Yanzhong Dang
  • Deqiang HuEmail author
  • Jiangning Wu
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1103)

Abstract

This paper’s purpose is to investigate the formation process of affect, the mechanisms by which it functions, and the dynamic characteristics of its influence on team performance. Toward this end, we present a computational experiment based on agent-based modeling. In particular, the modeling deeply penetrates internal psychological activities. Two computational experiments are conducted under different internal and external conditions for the team, yielding the following results. The process of affect formation is influenced by not only difficulty but also order of the task. Processing task from simple to difficult improves the formation of positive affect and facilitates team performance. While processing task from difficult to simple leads to the formation of negative affect and obstructs team performance. This research extends prior findings by examining the dynamic interplay of the determinants of affect over time and the study method presented herein are appropriate for other studies focusing on psychological effects on team, laying the foundations for new ideas for studying team building and team development.

Keywords

Affect Team performance Computational experiment Interpersonal knowledge interaction Computational model 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work was partly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 71471028 and No. 71871041.

References

  1. 1.
    Bankes, S., Lempert, R., Popper, S.: Making computational social science effective: epistemology, methodology, and technology. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 20(4), 377–388 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barsade, S.G., Gibson, D.E.: Why does affect matter in organizations? Acad. Manage. Perspect. 21(1), 36–59 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brannick, M.T., Roach, R.M., Salas, E.: Understanding team performance: a multimethod study. Hum. Perform. 6(4), 287–308 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brief, A.P., Weiss, H.M.: Organizational behavior: affect in the workplace. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 53(1), 279 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Côté, S.: Affect and performance in organizational settings. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 8(2), 65–68 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chohra, A., Chohra, A., Madani, K.: Affect in complex decision-making systems: from psychology to computer science perspectives. In: Iliadis, L., Maglogiannis, I., Papadopoulos, H., Sioutas, S., Makris, C. (eds.) AIAI 2014. IAICT, vol. 437, pp. 174–183. Springer, Heidelberg (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44722-2_19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dang, Y., Li, Y., Wu, J.: Quantitative study of affection generated by knowledge exchange in team. J. Inf. Knowl. Manag. 12(04), 1350036 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elfenbein, H.A.: Emotion in organizations: a review and theoretical integration. Ssrn Electron. J. 1(1), 371–457 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fredrickson, B.L.: What good are positive emotions? Rev. Gen. Psychol. J. Div. Am. Psychol. Assoc. 2(3), 300 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fredrickson, B.L.: The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 56(3), 218–226 (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smith, L.D.: Behaviorism and logical positivism: a reassessment of the alliance. Contemp. Sociol. 25(3), 467–468 (1986) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hochschild, A.R.: Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. Am. J. Sociol. 85(3), 551–575 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Isen, A.M.: An influence of positive affect on decision making in complex situations: theoretical issues with practical implications. J. Consum. Psychol. 11(2), 75–85 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    James, K., Brodersen, M., Eisenberg, J.: Workplace affect and workplace creativity: a review and preliminary model. Hum. Perform. 17(2), 169–194 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Junior, N.N.T., Vidotti, A.F., Alaranta, M., Fulk, H.K.: The influence of positive emotions on knowledge sharing. In: Americas Conference on Information Systems (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kelly, J.R., Barsade, S.G.: Mood and emotions in small groups and work teams. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 86(1), 99–130 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Krylova, K., Vera, D., Crossan, M.: Knowledge transfer in knowledge-intensive organizations: the crucial role of improvisation in transferring and protecting knowledge. J. Knowl. Manag. 20(5), 1045–1064 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Loewenstein, G., Lerner, J.S.: The role of affect in decision making, pp. 619–642 (2003)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Maitlis, S., Ozcelik, H.: Toxic decision processes: a study of emotion and organizational decision making. Organ. Sci. 15(4), 375–393 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Railsback, S.F., Lytinen, S.L., Jackson, S.K.: Agent-based simulation platforms: review and development recommendations. Simul. Trans. Soc. Model. Simul. Int. 82(9), 609–623 (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shang, J., Fu, Q., Zoltan, D., Shao, C., Fu, X.: Negative affect reduces performance in implicit sequence learning. PLoS ONE 8(1), e54693 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Steele-Johnson, D., Beauregard, R.S., Hoover, P.B., Schmidt, A.M.: Goal orientation and task demand effects on motivation, affect, and performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 85(5), 724–738 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stephens, J.P., Carmeli, A.: The positive effect of expressing negative emotions on knowledge creation capability and performance of project teams. Int. J. Project Manage. 34(5), 862–873 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Van Knippenberg, D., De Bode, H.J.M.K., Van Ginkel, W.P.: The interactive effects of mood and trait negative affect in group decision making. Organ. Sci. 21(3), 731–744 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zambonelli, F., Jennings, N.R., Wooldridge, M.: Organizational abstractions for the analysis and design of multi-agent system. In: International Workshop, Aose 2000 on Agent-Oriented Software Engineering, pp. 235–251 (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xin Yue
    • 1
  • Yanzhong Dang
    • 1
  • Deqiang Hu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jiangning Wu
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of System EngineeringDalian University of TechnologyDalianChina

Personalised recommendations