Error Compensation Strategies for Workpiece Deflection During End Milling of Thin-Walled Straight and Curved Geometries

  • Hareendran ManikandanEmail author
  • S. Sreejith
  • Kanjiyangat Vivek
  • C. Sasi Jayaram
  • P. A. Azeemhafiz
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


Thin-walled parts and their precision manufacturing is finding importance in the field of aerospace as well as automobile component manufacturing industries. The value of machining of thin walls like honeycomb structures increases because of the efficiency of such parts in any assembly as robust members which results in reducing the fuel usage and increasing strength of the system. In this part of research work, characterization of surface errors and compensation of errors by offline toolpath modification techniques is discussed. Major concerns of machining in end milling and cutting conditions variables include axial as well as radial depths of cut. After validation of errors by some results of cutting experiments toward predicted using a model, compensation strategies negating the errors are proposed. The results are directly applicable to similar manufacturing of various complex parts.


Thin-walled part Workpiece and tool deflection Surface error Error compensation Offline toolpath compensation method 


  1. 1.
    Denkena B, Boujnah H (2018) Feeling machines for online detection and compensation of tool deflection in milling. CIRP Ann—Manuf Technol 67:4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bolar G, Das A, Joshi SN (2018) Measurement and analysis of cutting force and product surface quality during end-milling of thin-wall components. Measurement 121:190–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ratchev S, Liu S, Huang W, Becker AA (2006) An advanced FEA based force induced error compensation strategy in milling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:542–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen W, Xue J, Tang D, Chen H, Qu S (2009) Deformation prediction and error compensation in multilayer milling processes for thin-walled parts. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49:859–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Feng WL, Yao XD, Azamat A, Yang JG (2015) Straightness error compensation for large CNC gantry type milling centers based on B-spline curves modeling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 88:165–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gu J, Agapiou JS (2016) Assessment and implementation of Global offset compensation method. J Manuf Syst 48:7Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hu C, Wang Z, Zhu Y, Zhang M (2018) Accurate three-dimensional contouring error estimation and compensation scheme with zero-phase filter. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 128:33–40, MayGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li ZL, Tuysuz O, Zhu LM, Altintas Y (2018) Surface form error prediction in five-axis flank milling of thin-walled parts. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 128:21–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ratchev S, Liu S, Becker AA (2005) Error compensation strategy in milling flexible thin-wall parts. J Mater Process Technol 162–163:673–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hareendran Manikandan
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. Sreejith
    • 2
  • Kanjiyangat Vivek
    • 3
  • C. Sasi Jayaram
    • 4
  • P. A. Azeemhafiz
    • 5
  1. 1.National Institute of TechnologyCalicutIndia
  2. 2.Gurudeva Institute of Science and TechnologyKottayamIndia
  3. 3.College of Engineering, Eranad Knowledge CityManjeri, MalappuramIndia
  4. 4.Ilahiya College of Engineering and TechnologyMuvattupuzhaIndia
  5. 5.College of Engineering, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz UniveristyAl KharjSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations