Research on New Generation of Multi-domain Unified Modeling Language for Complex Products

  • Lin ZhangEmail author
  • Li-Yuanjun Lai
  • Fei Ye
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1094)


Modeling and simulation has become an important method to support designing and developing complex products. It’s an urgent issue to combine design and simulation together in order to support the efficient development of multi-disciplinary and full-process collaborative design work of complex products. For this problem, a new generation of multi-domain unified modeling language framework for complex products is proposed, which supports multi-disciplinary and full-process collaborative design and cross-domain collaborative simulation optimization for complex products, and realizes the full process standardization and collaborative modeling of complex products. Finally, the goal of precision modeling, global simulation, and optimal synergy is achieved.


Complex product Modeling language Collaborative design Simulation optimization 



The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the National Key Technologies R&D Program of China (Project No. 2018YFB1701600).


  1. 1.
    Lin, Z., Lei, R., Fei, T.: Complex product manufacturing digital integration platform technology. Def. Manuf. Technol. 4, 4–10 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ana Luisa, R., Jose, F., Jaume, B.: Model-based systems engineering: an emerging approach for modern systems. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C 42(1), 101–111 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sanford, F., Alan, M., Rick, S.: OMG systems modeling language (OMG SysML™) tutorial. In: INCOSE International Symposium (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yu, T.: Study on Objected-oriented Bond Graph Modeling and Simulation of Multi-domain Complex Mechatronic System. Institute of Mechanical Science (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xiaobo, C., Guangleng, X., Bin, G., et al.: Research on multi-disciplinary modeling based on HLA. J. Syst. Simul. 15(11), 1537–1542 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jianjun, Z., Jianwan, D., Fanli, Z., et al.: Modelica and its mechanism of multi-domain unified modeling and simulation. J. Syst. Simul. 18, 570–573 (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schamai, W.: Modelica Modeling Language (ModelicaML): A UML Profile for Modelica. Institute of Technology (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yue, C., Yusheng, L., Hongri, F., et al.: SysML-based uniform behavior modeling and automated mapping of design and simulation model for complex mechatronics. Comput. Aided Des. 45(3), 764–776 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gauthier, J.-M., Bouquet, F., Hammad, A., Peureux, F.: Tooled process for early validation of SysML models using modelica simulation. In: Dastani, M., Sirjani, M. (eds.) FSEN 2015. LNCS, vol. 9392, pp. 230–237. Springer, Cham (2015). Scholar
  10. 10.
    Xinguang, L., Jihong, L.: A method of SysML-based visual transformation of system design-simulation models. J. Comput. Aided Des. Comput. Graph. 28(11), 1973–1981 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shuhua, Z., Yue, C., Zheng, Z., et al.: System design and simulation integration for complex mechatronic products based on SysML and modelica. J. Comput. Aided Des. Comput. Graph. 30(4), 728–738 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Automation Science and Electrical EngineeringBeihang UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Engineering Research Center of Complex Product Advanced Manufacturing Systems, Ministry of EducationBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations