Advertisement

Simulation Model Selection Method Based on Semantic Search in Cloud Environment

  • Siqi Xiong
  • Feng ZhuEmail author
  • Yiping Yao
  • Wenjie Tang
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1094)

Abstract

Search and selection of simulation model is an important process of building simulation application of complex system based on model composition in cloud architecture environment. This paper aims to solve the problem of lacking model correlation search and quality of service (QoS) weighted selection. The knowledge graph is used to describe the simulation models and their correlations. According to the model attributes (such as model name, domain, type, time scale, model granularity, etc.) and the model correlation (such as equipment model carrying relationship, etc.) set by users, the initial set of simulation models satisfying the requirements is found based on semantic search. Then, an optimization selection mechanism based on QoS is proposed to support users in customizing the weights of the QoS indices. The optimally ordered model candidate set is provided for selecting according to the weighting comparison of QoS indices. The experimental results show that the proposed method based on semantic search can support the effective selection of simulation models in cloud environment and the composite modeling of complex systems.

Keywords

Cloud computing environment Knowledge graph Semantic search QoS-based model selection method 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 61903368).

References

  1. 1.
    Calheiros, R.N., Ranjan, R., Beloglazov, A., Rose, C.A.F.D., Buyya, R.: CloudSim: a toolkit for modelling and simulation of cloud computing environments and evaluation of resource provisioning algorithms. Softw. Pract. Exp. 41(1), 23–50 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sotiriadis, S., Bessis, N., Antonopoulos, N., et al.: SimIC: designing a new inter-cloud simulation platform for integrating large-scale resource management. In: IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Taylor, S.J.E., et al.: Grand challenges for modelling and simulation: simulation everywhere—from cyber infrastructure to clouds to citizens. Simulation 91(7), 648–665 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moghaddam, M., Davis, J.G.: Service Selection in Web service Composition: A Comparative Review of Existing Approaches. Springer, New York (2014). 10.1007/978-1-4614-7518-7_13Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Christensen, E., et al.: Web services description language (WSDL). In: Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining (2003Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moreau (Canon), J.: Web services Description Language (WSDL) Version 1.2: Bindings (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yao, Y., Liu, G.: High-performance simulation computer for large-scale system-of-systems simulation. J. Syst. Simul. 23(8), 1617–1623 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bechhofer, S.: OWL: web ontology language. In: Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, vol. 63(45), 2nd edn., pp. 990–996 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zeng, L., et al.: QoS-aware middleware for Web services composition. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 3(4), 449–470 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pujara, J., Miao, H., Getoor, L., Cohen, W.: Knowledge graph identification. In: Alani, H., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2013. LNCS, vol. 8218, pp. 542–557. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41335-3_34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xu, Z.-L., Sheng, Y.P., He, L.-R., Wang, Y.F.: Review on knowledge graph techniques. J. Univ. Electron. Sci. Technol. China 45, 589–606 (2016)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xin, W.: Realizing Semantic Web services Description with OWL -S Ontology. New Technology of Library & Information Service (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sheng, B., Zhang, C., Yin, X., et al.: Common intelligent semantic matching engines of cloud manufacturing service based on OWL-S. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 84(1–4), 103–118 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kanthavel, R., Maheswari, K., Padmanabhan, N.: Information retrieval based on semantic matching approach in web service discovery. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 64(16), 54–56 (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Purohit, L., Kumar, S.: Web service selection using semantic matching. In: International Conference on Advances in Information Communication Technology and Computing (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang, T., Liu, Y.S.: Semantic Web-based approach to simulation services dynamic discovery. Comput. Eng. Appl. 43(32), 15–19 (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Song, L.L., Qun, L.I.: Research on simulation model description ontology and its matching model. Comput. Eng. Appl. 44(30), 6–12 (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li, T., Li, B.H., Chai, X.D.: Layered simulation service description framework oriented to cloud simulation. Comput. Integr. Manuf. Syst. 18(9), 2091–2098 (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cheng, C., Chen, A.Q.: Study on cloud service evaluation index system based on QoS. Appl. Mech. Mater. 742, 683–687 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang, T., Liu, Y., Zha, Y.: Optimal approach to QoS-driven simulation services composition. J. Syst. Simul. 21(16), 4990–4994 (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu, J., Sun, J., Jiang, L.: A QoS evaluation model for cloud computing. Comput. Knowl. Technol. 6(31), 8801–8803, 8806 (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    T. M. Organization: Resource Description Framework (RDF). Encyclopedia of GIS, pp. 6–19 (2004)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Xiong, S., Zhu, F., Yao, Y.P., Tang, W.J.: A description method of cloud simulation model resources based on knowledge graph. In 4th International Conference on Cloud Computing and Big Data Analytics, Chengdu, pp. 655–663. IEEE (2019)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Huang, Y.: The Research on Evaluation Model of Cloud Service Based on QoS and Application. Zhejiang Gongshang University (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Systems EngineeringNational University of Defense TechnologyChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations