Advertisement

Strengthening Komnas HAM and Building Synergies with Other National State Institutions on Human Rights

  • Inosentius Samsul
Chapter
  • 33 Downloads

Abstract

Indonesia is the only country in Southeast Asia that has three National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs), which are the National Commission on Human Rights (Komnas HAM), the National Commission on Women (Komnas Perempuan), and the National Commission on Child Protection (KPAI). Komnas Perempuan and KPAI has different positions with regard to Komnas HAM. Although the name is the National Commission; however, these Commissions have been unable to improve the protection and enforcement of human rights in Indonesia. Komnas HAM has “more power” “in terms of position as an independent institution as the National Human Rights Institution” (NHRIs).

The main research question is how the role of Komnas HAM differentiates from that of the Komnas Perempuan and KPAI based on their authority, position, function and coordination. How is the relationship and division of tasks and functions between these Commissions and other government agencies such as the witness and victim protection agency, the ministry of law and human rights, and the ministry foreign affairs? What is the support needed by Komnas HAM to be able to carry out its duties and authorities as the leading National Human Rights Institution.

This chapter examines the construction of institutions and powers of the National Human Rights Commission is no longer appropriate to the dynamics of the human rights problems in Indonesia. The role of the human rights commissions has decreased compared to the role in the pre-reform era in Indonesia. There is no clear division between the authority of the National Commission of Women and Child Protection Commission. There is no one common understanding of the division of tasks and roles of government agencies with the Commissions.

Komnas HAM as the leading institution out of the three Indonesian human rights institutions still faces various obstacles in implementing its functions and tasks. Komnas HAM’s human resources are not proportional to the workload and the demands and expectations of the people to get excellent service. In addition, to run its mandate, the budget given to Komnas HAM is still limited. Komnas HAM cannot perform its functions and duties optimally.

The main recommendation from this chapter is to reformulate the authorities of the three Commissions to make them more powerful in coordination between them and enlisting support from the other government institutions. The financial support, as well as decentralization policy through the addition of representative offices in the region, is needed. The strengthening of the number and quality of human resources is also needed.

References

  1. Asshiddiqie, J. 2017. Efforts to strengthen KOMNAS HAM through the drafting of the draft of human rights law.Google Scholar
  2. KOMNASHAM, Paper Presentation in the framework of public discussion on the Future of Komnas HAM and Proposed Bill of Komnas HAM, in Jakarta, 4 April, 2012.Google Scholar
  3. Jensen, S. 2018 Lessons From Research On National Human Rights Institutions A Desk Review On Findings Related To NHRI Effectiveness. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Human Rights.Google Scholar
  4. Khalid, Hari, and Purwadi, Hartiwiningsih. 2018a. Integration of Human Rights Institutions for Strengthening the Independence and Effectiveness of Human Rights Protections in Indonesia. UI Proceedings on Social Science and Humanities Vol. 2 2018.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 2018b. Strengthening Of Institutions And Protections Enforcement Of Rights Of Women And Children In Constitution, International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, Vol. 15, Issue 5 (April).Google Scholar
  6. Mayrhofer, M., Francisco Aquilar, Mehdi Azeriah, Renata Bregaglio, Jeremy Gunn, Patrick Harris, Amal Idrissi, Alvaro Lagresa, Adrián Lengua, Y.S.R. Murthy, Bright Nkrumah, Kristine Yigen. 2016. European Commission. International Human Rights Protection: The Role of National Human Rights Institutions—A Case Study.Google Scholar
  7. Ministry of Women Empowerment and Child Protection. 2016a. Explanation of the Minister of Women’s Empowerment and the Protection of the Children of the Republic of Indonesia on the Progress of the Issues of Children in Indonesia and its Settlement Measures at Working Meetings with Commission VIII with the Minister of Social Affairs, the PP-PA Minister, the Head of the Republic of Indonesia, and the Indonesian Child Protection Commission, Jakarta, 30 May 2016.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 2016b. Explanation of Minister of Women Empowerment and Child Protection of the Republic of Indonesia at Working Meeting with Commission VIII DPR RI (Parliament) In the Framework of Budgetary Talk Introduction 2017. Jakarta 1 September 2016.Google Scholar
  9. Organski, A.F. 2010. The Stages of Political Development, in Amran Tasai Akademika Presindo (Ed) Jakarta, Indonesia, 2010.Google Scholar
  10. Rommy, P. (2012) Institutional Strengthening of Komnas HAM in the State System of Indonesia. Available at http://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/mmh/article/viewFile/5749/9838.
  11. Satya A. 2008. Human Rights in Political Transition in Indonesia, Center for Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law, University of Indonesia, 2008.Google Scholar
  12. Suparman, M. 2010. Politics of Human Rights Law in Indonesia in the Reform Era (Study of the Enforcement of Human Rights Laws in the Settlement of Past Human Rights Violations), Yogyakarta: Summary of Dissertation of Doctoral Program of Legal Science of Post Graduate Program of Faculty of Law UII, 2010.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Asia Centre 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Inosentius Samsul
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of LawUniversity of IndonesiaDepokIndonesia

Personalised recommendations