The Protection Capacities of NHRIs

  • James GomezEmail author
  • Robin Ramcharan


This chapter, in summarizing the findings, notes a gap between the mandates of National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) and their capacity to provide protection and pursue remedies following the receipt of complaints and conduct of investigations. NHRIs have been operating in very challenging national and regional political contexts, which have seen a regression in democracy and the rule of law. NHRIs must enhance significantly their capacity and willingness to fulfil some critical roles: (1) investigating allegations of violations, to conduct credible, impartial “hearings” on the same and to publicize these for public awareness of the pursuit of justice; and (2) secure remedies for victims of violations. Such enhancement may take some time given the very challenging political context. Moreover, NHRIs find themselves in a wider geo-political context of a rising China that challenges the international human rights movement and seeks to showcase its authoritarian political system.


  1. ANNI Report. 2018 ANNI Report on the Performance and Establishment of National Human Rights Institutions in Asia. Bangkok: Forum Asia.Google Scholar
  2. Associated Press. 2017. China presents its take on human rights at global forum in Beijing. 7 December. Available at
  3. BBC. 2018. Malaysia Election: Opposition Scores Historic Victory. 10 May. Available at
  4. Commonwealth Secretariat. 2001. National Human Rights Institutions: Best Practice. Commonwealth Secretariat.Google Scholar
  5. Commonwealth Forum on NHRIs. 2019. Guidelines on How to Run a National Human Rights Institution.Google Scholar
  6. De Beco, G., and Murray, R. 2015. A commentary on the Paris Principles on national human rights institutions/Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Ellis-Peterson, Hannah. 2018. Cambodia: Hun Sen re-elected in landslide victory after brutal crackdown. 29 July. Available at
  8. GANHRI. 2019. Statement of the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI) at the 41st session of the Human Rights Council, under agenda item 8 on the presentation of the OHCHR report on the inter-sessional meeting on NHRIs and SDGs, held on 7 March 2019 (report A/HRC/41/30).Google Scholar
  9. Kurlantzick, Joshua. 2019. “After Jokowi’s Victory,” Council on Foreign Relations. 28 May. Available at
  10. McBeth, John. 2019. “Indonesia election exposes ethnic, religious divides,” Asia Times. 22 eat
  11. Prachatai. 2019. “Two human rights commissioners resign; say new regulations made them feel restricted. 1 August.Google Scholar
  12. Somjittranukit, Kornkritch. 2018. Constitution turns NHRC into government mouthpiece. Prachatai, 4 May.Google Scholar
  13. Subedi, S.P. 2015. China’s Approach to Human Rights and the UN Human Rights Agenda. Chinese Journal of International Law, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 437–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. UN General Assembly. 2017. National Institutions for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights. A/C.3/72/L.45. 31 October.Google Scholar
  15. Xinhua. 2018. China willing to cooperate with world in human rights: official. 18 September. Available at

Copyright information

© Asia Centre 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Asia CentreBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations