Advertisement

Civility and Mutual Fellow-Feeling

  • Andrew PetersonEmail author
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Education book series (BRIEFSEDUCAT)

Abstract

This chapter examines the second component of political conduct introduced in Chap.  1—mutual fellow-feeling. Recognising the challenges of close communal bonds in contemporary, large, heterogeneous democracies, a case is made for conceiving the bonds between citizens in terms of an Aristotelian notion of civic friendship. The key argument of the chapter is that civility as a civic virtue for contemporary western democracies is strengthened when we understand it in relational terms and as intimately connected with a form of partnership between citizens who share a sense of mutual positive regard. In this sense, civility describes relationships (i.e. the relationship between A and B is civil or uncivil) and is supported or limited by the nature of our relationships (i.e. the positive regard between C and D supports civil conduct between them, while the dislike or hatred between X and Y severely limits civil conduct between them). Civility operates in a fluid and dynamic way, able to rise and fall, and can therefore be understood as a precious resource which requires constant attention, cultivation and protection within democratic societies through formative processes. This latter point, it will be argued, also acts as a reminder that where democratic processes and relationships are problematic—when they are, for instance, corrupt, overly antagonistic, un-inclusive and so on—this will be to the further detriment of levels of civility.

Keywords

Civility Mutual fellow-feeling Well-wishing Civic friendship Formative processes 

References

  1. American Psychological Association. (2018, October 5). Panel discusses nation’s decline in civil discourse. Retrieved June 20, 2019, from https://www.apa.org/members/content/civil-discourse
  2. Aristotle. (1991). The art of rhetoric (H. C. Lawson-Trancred, Trans.). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  3. Aristotle. (1992). In T. J. Saunders (Ed.), The politics. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  4. Aristotle. (2009). The Nicomachean ethics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Aristotle. (2011). The Eudemian ethics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Barber, B. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. Barber, B. (1999). The discourse of civility. In S. L. Elkin & K. E. Soltan (Eds.), Citizen competence and democratic institutions. Pennsylvania State University Press: University Park, PA.Google Scholar
  8. Bates, L. (2019, April 24). Brexit’s court room battle has become toxic – I’m quitting as a minster to search for common ground. Politics Home. https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/political-parties/conservative-party/opinion/house-lords/103407/lord-bates-brexits-court
  9. Boyd, R. (2006). The value of civility. Urban Studies, 43(5/6), 863–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Calhoun, C. (2000). The virtue of civility. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 29(3), 251–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carter, S. L. (1998). Civility: Manners, morals and the etiquette of democracy. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  12. Chen, G., & Lu, S. (2017). Online political discourse: Exploring differences in effects of civil and uncivil disagreement in news website comments. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 61(1), 108–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cooper, J. (1990). Aristotle on friendship. In A. O. Rorty (Ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s ethics (pp. 301–340). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cooper, J. (1999). Political animals and civic friendship. In J. Cooper (Ed.), Reason and emotion (pp. 356–377). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Cuddihy, J. (1978). The ordeal of civility: Freud, Marx, Lévi-Strauss, and the Jewish struggle with modernity. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  16. Curren, R. (2019). Populism and the fate of civic friendship. In J. Arthur (Ed.), Virtues in the public sphere: Citizenship, civic friendship and duty (pp. 92–107). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Curzer, H. J. (2012a). An Aristotelian account of civility. In D. S. Mower & W. L. Robison (Eds.), Civility in politics and education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Curzer, H. J. (2012b). Aristotle and the virtues. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. D’Olimpio, L. (2018). Trust as a virtue in education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(2), 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fiala, A. (2013). The fragility of civility: Virtue, civil society, and tragic breakdowns of civility. Dialogue and Universalism, 3, 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Galarza Molina, R., & Jennings, F. J. (2018). The role of civility and metacommunication in Facebook discussions. Communication Studies, 69(1), 42–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Han, S.-H., & Brazeal, L. M. (2015). Playing nice: Modelling civility in online political discussions. Communication Research Reports, 32(1), 20–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Han, S.-H., Brazeal, L. M., & Pennington, N. (2018). Is civility contagious? Examining the impact of modelling in online political discussions. Social Media + Society, 4(3), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hmielowski, J. D., Hutchens, M. J., & Cicchirillo, V. J. (2014). Living in an age of online incivility: Examining the conditional indirect effects of online discussion on political flaming. Information, Communication & Society, 17(10), 1196–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jacobs, L. R., Cook, F. L., & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2009). Talking together: Public deliberation and political participation in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jochum, V., Pratten, B., & Wilding, K. (2005). Civil renewal and active citizenship: a guide to the debate. Retrieved June 20, 2019, from https://www.ncvo.org.uk/images/documents/policy_and_research/participation/civil_renewal_active_citizenship.pdf
  27. Kekes, J. (1984). Civility and society. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 1(4), 429–443.Google Scholar
  28. Kronman, A. T. (1996). Civility. Faculty Scholarship Series, 1055. https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/1055.
  29. Leontsini, E. (2013). The motive of society: Aristotle on civic friendship, justice, and concord. Res Publica, 19, 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Macedo, S., Alex-Assensoh, Y., Berry, J. M., Brintnall, M., Campbell, D. E., Fraga, L. R., et al. (2005). Democracy at risk: How political choices undermine citizen participation, and what we can do about it. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  31. Mayhew, R. (1996). Aristotle on civic friendship (p. 197). The Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy Newsletter. http://orb.binghampton/sagep/197
  32. Mutz, D. (2007). Effects of ‘in-your-face’ television discourse on perceptions of a legitimate opposition. American Political Science Review, 101(4), 621–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mutz, D. C., & Reeves, B. (2005). The new videomalaise: Effects of televised incivility on political trust. American Political Science Review, 99(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Oldfield, A. (1990). Citizenship and community, civil republicanism and the modern state. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Parekh, B. (2008). A new politics of identity: Political principles for an interdependent world. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism: A theory of freedom and government. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Price, A. W. (1989). Love and friendship in plato and aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Sandel, M. (1996). Democracy’s discontent: America in search of a public philosophy. London: Belknap Harvard.Google Scholar
  40. Schwarzenbach, S. A. (1996). On civic friendship. Ethics, 107(1), 97–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schwarzenbach, S. A. (2015). Fraternity, solidarity and friendship. AMITY: The Journal of Friendship Studies, 3(1), 3–18.Google Scholar
  42. Scorza, J. (2004). Liberal citizenship and civic friendship. Political Theory, 32(1), 85–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shils, E. (1997) The virtue of civility: Selected essays on liberalism, tradition, and civil society. Ed. by S. Grosby. Carmel, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
  44. Sobieraj, S., & Berry, J. M. (2011). From incivility to outrage: Political discourse in blogs, talk radio, and cable news. Political Communication, 28(1), 19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sullivan, W. M. (1995). Reinstitutionalizing virtue in civil society. In M. A. Glendon (Ed.), Seedbeds of virtue: Sources of competence, character and citizenship in American society (pp. 185–200). Lanham, MD: Madison Books.Google Scholar
  46. Sydnor, E. (2019). Signaling incivility: The role of speaker, substance, and tone. In R. G. Boatright, T. J. Shaffer, S. Sobieraj, & D. Goldthwaite Young (Eds.), A crisis of civility? Political discourse and its discontents (pp. 61–80). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. van der Meer, T. W. G. (2017). Political trust and the “crisis of democracy”. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia, Politics (pp. 1–22). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Waldron, J. (2013). Civility and formality. New York University public law and legal theory working papers. Paper 428. http://lsr.nellco.org/nyu_plltwp/428
  49. Walzer, M. (1974). Civility and civic virtue in contemporary America. Social Research, 41(4), 593–611.Google Scholar
  50. Yack, B. (1993). The problems of a political animal. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  51. Zmerli, S., & Newton, K. (2008). Social trust and attitudes toward democracy. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(4), 706–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jubilee Centre for Character and VirtuesUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations