Energy Efficient and Multicast Based Greedy Routing for Proactive and Reactive Routing Protocols

  • Seli MohapatraEmail author
  • Pujapushpanjali Mohanty
  • B. K. Ratha
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies book series (LNDECT, volume 37)


Due to frequent path break up the lifetime of an adhoc network decreases which leads to the development of energy-efficient routing. Again to improve the speed and scalability issue, geographic routing has prior importance. In this paper, we have addressed the improvisation in QoS for adhoc network on the basis of multicast based greedy forwarding strategy for different routing protocols under various constraints. We have proposed these methods on proactive and reactive protocols to analyze major performance factors like control overhead, energy consumption, throughput, and end to end delay using NS3.


Greedy routing Multicast Energy efficiency Routing protocols Performance metrics 


  1. 1.
    C. de Morais Cordeiro, H. Gossain, D.P. Agrawal, Multicast over wireless mobile ad hoc networks: present and future directions. IEEE Netw. 17(1), 52–59 (2003), Scholar
  2. 2.
    S.J. Lee, W. Su, M. Gerla, On-demand multicast routing protocol in multihop wireless mobile networks, in Proceedings of ACM/Kluwer Mobile Networks and Applications (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S.-J. Lee, W. Su, J. Hsu, M. Gerla, R. Bagrodia, A performance comparison study of ad hoc wireless multicast protocols. IEEE Infocom, 565–574 (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    X. Li, S. Qiu, Research on multicast routing protocol in wireless sensor network, in International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems Engineering(CASE) (Singapore, 2011), pp. 1–4Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Moustafa, H. Labiod, Multicast routing in mobile ad hoc networks. Telecommun. Syst. 25(1,2), 65–88 (2004). Kluwer Academic PublishersGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    E.M. Royer, C.E. Perkins, Multicast operation of the ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing protocol, in MobiCom ‘99 Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (1999), pp. 207–218Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. Patel, A. Bhalavi, An implementation of MOLSR routing protocol in MANET. Int. J. Sci. Res. (IJSR) 6(3) (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Mohapatra, R.K. Mohapatra, Comparative analysis of energy efficient MAC protocol in heterogeneous sensor network under dynamic scenario, in 2017 2nd International Conference on Man and Machine Interfacing (MAMI) (Bhubaneswar, 2017), pp. 1–5Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Mohapatra, Performance analysis of multirate MM-OLSR protocol in wireless adhoc networks, in 2017 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Signal Processing and Networking (WiSPNET), (Chennai, 2017), pp. 1494–1499Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Mohapatra, P. Kanungo, Performance analysis of AODV, DSR, OLSR and DSDV routing protocols using NS2 simulator. Proced. Eng. ICCTSD’12 30, 69–76 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Mohapatra, P. Kanungo, Comparitive performance analysis of MANET routing protocols using NS2 simulator, in Computational Intelligence and Information Technology: Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 250 (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2011), pp. 731–736Google Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    M.-H. Huang, D.Y. Chen, D. Shen, M. Wang, Measuring technological performance of assignees using tracemetrics in three fields. Scientometrics 104(1) (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seli Mohapatra
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pujapushpanjali Mohanty
    • 2
  • B. K. Ratha
    • 3
  1. 1.C.V. Raman College of EngineeringBhubaneswarIndia
  2. 2.CETBhubaneswarIndia
  3. 3.Utkal University, VanibiharBhubaneswarIndia

Personalised recommendations